@blatham,
blatham wrote:
Let's make a deal. Where you forward a response to me, I'll try to get to it in those instances where you aren't being purposefully obtuse.
Nothing obtuse there at all. Neither of us knows what are the motives behind the actions of others. In the case of politicians they can indeed be an important question, and some speculation is both appropriate and inevitable. However when one speaks with certainty and forms an instant final judgment at the very outset of an sction, one has ventured into the land of B.S.
What are the "optimum criteria" in such a situation as an official appointment is very much a subject on which reasonable, informed people can disagree. Unilateral use of the term in a categorical judgment, such as yours, defies even the seven critrtia (sans brick) that you laid out.