@McGentrix,
McGentrix wrote:Don't usually disagree, but....
We'd have use of the satellites we have in stable orbit over N. Korea to mark each and every piece of artillery they have. Each of those would be marked and tracked and assigned how ever many cruise missiles needed to take them out.
Military assets are often disguised from satellite detection. We've had the same satellite detection in previous wars. There were still fixed radar sites that we didn't know about until they were turned on during the war, and mobile weapons that we never managed to strike at all.
North Korea has between 10,000 and 20,000 artillery pieces aimed at Seoul. How many cruise missiles can we launch at once?
McGentrix wrote:We would jam their radar and communications and take 90-95% of those threats out within an hour.
How do you destroy more than 10,000 artillery pieces in one hour with conventional weapons?
Assuming that we can destroy all this artillery in the space of one hour, how do you prevent undestroyed artillery pieces (that you won't get to until later in the hour) from firing on Seoul from the moment that your attack begins?
McGentrix wrote:I am pretty sure that if we decide to do any kind of strike it will be rapid and overwhelming.
I don't see how conventional weapons are rapid enough or overwhelming enough.