192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Olivier5
 
  3  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 12:45 pm
@georgeob1,
WaPo and Partnership for Public Service, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, are tracking more than 500 key executive branch nominations through the confirmation process. These positions include Cabinet secretaries, deputy and assistant secretaries, chief financial officers, general counsel, heads of agencies, ambassadors and other critical leadership positions. These are a portion of the roughly 1,200 positions that require Senate confirmation.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-administration-appointee-tracker/database/

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 53 positions
CONFIRMEDDETAILS
Gen. Jim Mattis
Secretary
ANNOUNCEDDETAILS
Patrick Shanahan
Deputy secretary
ANNOUNCEDDETAILS
John J. Sullivan
General counsel
NO NOMINEE
Inspector general
NOMINATEDDETAILS
David Norquist
Under secretary/comptroller
NO NOMINEE
Under secretary for acquisition, technology and logistics
NO NOMINEE
Under secretary for policy
NO NOMINEE
Under secretary for intelligence
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary for legislative affairs
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary for reserve affairs
NOMINATEDDETAILS
Heather Wilson
Secretary of the Air Force
NO NOMINEE
Under secretary of the Air Force
NO NOMINEE
General counsel of the Air Force
FAILEDDETAILS
Vincent Viola
Secretary of the Army
ANNOUNCEDDETAILS
Mark E. Green
Secretary of the Army
NO NOMINEE
Under secretary of the Army
ANNOUNCEDDETAILS
Ryan Dean Newman
General counsel of the Army
FAILEDDETAILS
Philip Bilden
Secretary of the Navy
NO NOMINEE
Secretary of the Navy
NO NOMINEE
Under secretary of the Navy
NO NOMINEE
General counsel of the Navy
NO NOMINEE
Director for operational test and evaluation
NO NOMINEE
Under secretary for personnel and readiness
ANNOUNCEDDETAILS
David Trachtenberg
Principal deputy under secretary for policy
NO NOMINEE
Principal deputy under secretary for intelligence
NO NOMINEE
Principal deputy under secretary for personnel and readiness
NO NOMINEE
Principal deputy under secretary for acquisition, technology, and logistics
ANNOUNCEDDETAILS
Elaine McCusker
Principal deputy under secretary (comptroller)
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary for Asian and Pacific security affairs
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary for strategy, plans and capabilities
ANNOUNCEDDETAILS
Kenneth Rapuano
Assistant Secretary for Homeland Defense and Global Security
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary for international security affairs
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary for special operations/low intensity conflict
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary for acquisition
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary for logistics and materiel readiness
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary for nuclear, chemical and biological defense
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary for energy, installations and environment
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary for research and engineering
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary for health affairs
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary for manpower and reserve affairs
NO NOMINEE
Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information (formerly Deputy Chief Management Officer)
ANNOUNCEDDETAILS
Robert Daigle
Director, Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary of the Air Force for acquisition, technology, logistics
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary for financial management and comptroller, Department of the Air Force
NO NOMINEE
Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Installations, Environment, and Logistics
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary of the Air Force for manpower and reserve affairs
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary of the Army for civil works
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary of the Army for financial management and comptroller, Department of the Army
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary of the Army for installations, energy and environment
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary of the Army for manpower and reserve affairs
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary of the Army for acquisition, logistics, and technology
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary of the Navy for energy, installations, and environment
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary of the Navy for financial management and comptroller, Department of the Navy
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary of the Navy for manpower and reserve affairs
NO NOMINEE
Assistant secretary of the Navy for research, development, and acquisition
layman
 
  0  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 01:18 pm
Excessive force, ya figure?



Would this make a difference?:

Quote:
The Fort Collins Police Department released a statement, saying the short video doesn't tell the full story of what happened.

According to the department, Surat's boyfriend was involved in a disturbance with another man at the Bondi Beach Bar.

When police arrived to investigate, Surat allegedly "shoulder-checked a bouncer and an officer" and tried to pull her boyfriend from the area.

Surat then physically obstructed and struck an officer, so a "standard arrest control" technique was used to subdue her.

Surat was arrested and booked into the Larimer County Jail on charges of third-degree assault and obstructing a peace officer.


Does it make any difference that she looks like a cheap-ass ho?

Does the guy in the background laughing maniacally make you wanna laugh, too?
revelette1
 
  3  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 01:25 pm
@layman,
You know you can make your own thread for items which have nothing to do with the thread you are posting in?
layman
 
  1  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 01:28 pm
@revelette1,
Trump is behind this, caincha see, Rev?

But you have a point. This thread is so damn dead that I think I'll make a new thread out of it right now. I wanna hear the feminists weigh in, ya know?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 01:33 pm
@Olivier5,
Just think how much these vacancies are saving our country.
I don't think any American has felt any change from having these positions empty.
0 Replies
 
ossobucotemp
 
  3  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 01:34 pm
Meantime, for any here who don't know what Colorado Governor Hickenlooper is about, wiki is useful. Me, I consider him a breath of fresh air.
He's also on the younger side of the governing loops (or hoops), and being on the handsome side doesn't hurt.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hickenlooper


edit - Dyslexia (Bob Wells) of a2k liked him before I'd ever heard of him... good enough for me, and even better when I knew more.
georgeob1
 
  1  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 01:38 pm
@Olivier5,
I read your list. Apart from the now archaic Secretary of Army, Navy, Air Force positions, most of the Undersecretary/principal deputy etc. positions are for civilian positions that didn't exist 20 years ago, many of which are targeted for elimination by Mattis. Our military readiness is not seriously threatened by a lack of bureaucrats in the Pentagon.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 01:45 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

McGentrix wrote:
Huh, why would the Federal Govt be involved in fixing water pipes in Flint?

The Obama Administration never cared about the people of Flint:
http://time.com/4190643/flint-water-crisis-susan-hedman-epa/

But Trump might care.


The Federal Government shouldn't have any business taking care of what the state or municipality should be taking care. Does everyone now just ignore infrastructure problems because Uncle Sam will fix it then?
revelette1
 
  3  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 02:02 pm
I am just wondering which side is going to win out in the end; Tillerson and his one-off comment or McMaster?

Quote:
NatSec adviser says “we’re prepared to do more” as Russia hints current U.S. strategy could mean war

In his first interview as President Donald Trump’s top national security adviser, Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster on Sunday backed the U.S. missile attack on Syria last week, saying “we’re prepared to do more,” even as Russian officials hint that current U.S. strategy could mean war.

McMaster told Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace the “president acted decisively” and that while the strike wasn’t meant to take out all of Syria’s capabilities, “it was a strong signal that the U.S. will not stand idly by.”

When Wallace asked what the United States will do if Russia defends its interests in Syria, mentioning Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev’s comments Friday that the U.S. missile strike in Syria put the two countries “on the verge of a military clash,” McMaster stood firm on his position that Russia is “part of the problem” and should become “part of the solution.”

“This is part of the problem with Syria, Russia’s sponsorship of [Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s] murderous regime. If we would want to appeal rationally to Russia,” McMaster said. “This is a great opportunity for the Russian leadership to reevaluate what they are doing. Why they are supporting a regime that is committing mass murder against its own people. So, Russia could be part of the solution. Right now I think everyone in the world sees Russia as part of the problem.”

McMaster continued, insinuating that he believed Russia had to be knowledgeable of Syria’s plan to launch a chemical attack.

“I think what we should do is ask Russia how could it be, if you have advisors at that airfield, that you didn’t know that the Syrian Air Force was preparing and executing a mass murder attack with chemical weapons? I
think we ought to ask them that question.”

The U.S. military strategy on Syria has complicated Trump’s attempt to warm relations with Russia. McMaster said “the president is determined to do everything he can to advance American interests” and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is scheduled to meet with Russian officials this week in Moscow. Voice of America reported Sunday that a scheduled meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin has been cancelled.

But for Russia or any other nation, McMaster said, supporting Syria’s regime isn’t in its best interest, and Russia ultimately decides the kind of relationship it wants with the United States.

“It can be whatever they wanted to be,” McMaster said. “Do they want to be a relationship in which we can find areas of cooperation that are in our mutual interest? How was it in anyone’s interest that this conflict in Syria and this catastrophe in the greater Middle East continue?”


TP
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 02:08 pm
@Lash,
Brilliant strategy? What are you talking about?

Assuming you are correct they were able to prompt a relatively minor strike, not start a war.

Just heard on the news that the Russians knew in advance of Assad's chemical attack and if this is so, there goes your improbable theory.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 02:12 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Quote:
Charles M. Blow‏Verified account @CharlesMBlow 10h10 hours ago
Tuck this feather in ur hat: Feds spent $100 mil to bomb airbase in Syria but couldn't find $55 mil to fix pipes in Flint #WhoCaresAboutKids

And doesn't that tell us all we need to know about where power and influence reside and who in the nation are deemed of no importance.


Hey Professor, please do some more research and find out how much the US spent on Obama's drone strikes and leading from behind in Libya.

Try and be consistent for a change, will you?
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 02:16 pm
@blatham,
GOP has lost the popular vote because of the demographics of large urban welfare centers. That wasn't too tough.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 02:19 pm
@blatham,
You did

I was mistaken. I thought you were quoting a recent tweet he made about Trump.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 02:20 pm
@cicerone imposter,
OK you do that.

(Would it be mean to suggest CI holds his breath in the meantime?)
McGentrix
 
  -1  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 02:20 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:

Laughing Laughing Laughing That's rich!
"Right Wing media and the Koch Brothers !" There must be a conspiracy. It can't be opposition to bad policy and inept governance.

You're starting to look ridiculous.


"Starting". Hehehe...
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  0  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 02:22 pm
@layman,
layman wrote:

Quote:
You're starting to look ridiculous.


"Starting to?"


D'oh! I should have went to the next page...
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 02:23 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
...this extremism is not mirrored on the left.


I just sprayed my monitor with coffee.

This reveals how pointless it is to discuss these things with you. I'm sure you won't mind that I'll be taking a pass from now on.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 02:25 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Not necessary. The longer the vacancies, more the savings. Mr. Green
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 02:26 pm
@georgeob1,
"Starting?"
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Mon 10 Apr, 2017 02:27 pm
@layman,
Oops - I posted the same thing before seeing this.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 4.8 seconds on 11/24/2024 at 05:55:37