@Blickers,
Quote:2 percent of the existing insurances covered being cancelled because they could not meet even the reduced standards the ACA required for existing insurance policies-those existing policies did NOT have to meet the same standards the ACA policies did-is not a significant number, sorry. Even your article admits that.
That has nothing to do with the fact that more people lost their insurance than Obama admitted would when he and the DNC were pushing the ACA. They still listed it as the lie of the year. He lied, he didn't say some would lose their plans, he said you could keep your plan if you liked it. Liking your plan didn't take into effect that govt regulations would make it impossible to keep your plan. It was a lie and he was called on it.
Quote:One thing that needs saying: Before the ACA, there were a lot of crappy health care policies out there.
According to who? You? Since when do you get to tell people their plans are crappy? If they liked them it was their issue, not your issue to change.
Quote: Policies with super high deductibles and little coverage-even emergency room care was not covered.
Do you have any stats or facts to back this up? I'm sure there were plans offered with no emergency services, and that should have been someones choice if they wanted that type of coverage or not.
Quote:Employers, especially those who paid low wages, bought them because that way they could say they offered a health care plan. But when somebody really needed it, they had little applicable coverage.
Once again, do you have any facts to back this up? You are spouting more of the same BS propaganda that was used to push the ACA. What percentage of people had these types of insurance plans?
Quote:The ACA allowed existing policies a break and did not require them to meet the standards the ACA policies had-but they wouldn't allow junk policies to take the place of the ACA policies.
No they didn't. They had such narrow confines of change that it was impossible to make a slight change to the policy without cancelling the policy.
What you call "junk policies" is a personal opinion and more ACA propaganda. In fact if a policy didn't have BC coverage, it was considered junk, even though the people who held the policy didn't want or require insurance for something that couldn't happen to them. It defies the logic of what insurance is for.
Quote:Those small amount of cancellations were mostly those junk policies, and 4 million cancellations out of 262 milion people covered is essentially minuscule.
More ACA propaganda. Going by Obama's and other DNC members words, no one should have lost a policy they liked. It didn't meet an artificial standard set by the govt, so they were junk? Of course I have to remember we are dealing with a group of people who think they know what is better for me than I do.