192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
blatham
 
  3  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 10:06 am
There's an interesting omission and substitution in this. Clue: look at the last three words.
Quote:
Donald J. Trump‏Verified account
@realDonaldTrump
ObamaCare will explode and we will all get together and piece together a great healthcare plan for THE PEOPLE. Do not worry!


He apparently deemed it unwise this morning to write "Believe me!"
wmwcjr
 
  1  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 10:09 am
@gungasnake,
Quote:
Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones backs off ‘Pizzagate’ claims

By Paul Farhi March 24 at 10:40 PM



Alex Jones, the conspiracy-loving media personality, apologized Friday for his role in promoting “Pizzagate,” the baseless viral story that a Washington pizza restaurant was the locale of a child sex-abuse ring run by Hillary Clinton and her campaign chairman, John Podesta.

In a surprising and rare bit of backtracking, Jones posted a six-minute video on his website, “InfoWars,” in which he read a prepared statement formally distancing himself and his site from what became a textbook story of fake news run amok. He addressed his apology to James Alefantis, the owner of Comet Ping Pong, the restaurant that was the supposed locale of the alleged conspiracy last year.

“I made comments about Mr. Alefantis that in hindsight I regret, and for which I apologize to him,” Jones said. “We relied on third-party accounts of alleged activities and conduct at the restaurant. We also relied on accounts of [two] reporters who are no longer with us.”

He added, “To my knowledge today, neither Mr. Alefantis nor his restaurant Comet Ping Pong, were involved in any human trafficking as was part of the theories about Pizzagate.” The story, he said, “was based upon what we now believe was an incorrect narrative.”

Jones, a staunch supporter of Donald Trump during the presidential campaign, offered no comment or apology to Clinton or Podesta for outlandish statements about their alleged involvement in the abuse of hundreds of children.

Jones didn’t say what prompted his apology but it may have been motivated by a letter Alefantis wrote to him in February. The letter demands an apology and retraction for InfoWars’ postings about Pizzagate; it does not threaten legal action, but refers to what Alefantis describes as “defaming” comments by InfoWars.

But the timing of Jones’s apology suggests he was concerned about a potential lawsuit. Under Texas law, the Austin-based Jones had to retract or apologize for the stories by Friday — one full month after receiving Alefantis’s letter — to avoid exposing InfoWars to punitive damages in a libel suit.

In a statement, Alefantis said, “I am pleased that Mr. Jones has apologized and admitted that he and his employees repeatedly spread falsehoods about me and my restaurant. I wish that he would have made this admission and apology months ago. And his apology, while welcome, does nothing to address the harm he and his company have done to me, my business, and my community.”

A spokeswoman for Alefantis said Friday that Alefantis and his attorney “continue to evaluate our legal claims.”

As the story spread, Alefantis and his employees received multiple death threats. The rumors culminated in December when a North Carolina man, Edgar Madisson Welch, came to the restaurant with a loaded assault rifle and handgun in what he called an attempt to investigate the claims. He fired the rifle several times while inside the restaurant, according to court documents.

Welch coincidentally pleaded guilty on Friday to weapons and assault charges in an agreement with federal prosecutors in the District.

InfoWars wasn’t the principal progenitor of the false story. The story spread primarily through such user-generated sites as Reddit and 4chan, as well as through fake-news websites and social media.

But InfoWars played a role, publishing numerous articles and commentaries that speculated about the alleged involvement of Clinton and Podesta. Pizzagate was sparked by cryptic comments made by Podesta in emails that were stolen and later released by WikiLeaks during the campaign.

Among the more damaging elements cited by Alefantis in his Feb. 22 letter was InfoWars’ role in encouraging its followers “to go out and investigate the ‘Pizzagate’ conspiracy theory, to come to my restaurant and investigate lies.”

In his statement, Alefantis noted, “We can all hope that Mr. Jones’ retreat is the beginning of a process to hold accountable the people who motivated an armed gunman to travel across state lines and fire his weapon in a family-friendly restaurant.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/conspiracy-theorist-alex-jones-backs-off-pizzagate-claims/2017/03/24/6f0246fe-10cd-11e7-ab07-07d9f521f6b5_story.html?utm_term=.355011c99127

georgeob1
 
  -2  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 10:17 am
@blatham,
The Commonwealth Fund is and advocacy group for government managed health care programs. It is hardly a surprise that it marked the U.S. down for our lack of universal coverage.

Their report lacks any quantitative measures or clarity in just how the "averages" they use are measured or weighted. Moreover we have only rankings and not any numerical measure of the actual differences in the various qualities they measured, or how they were combined and weighted to create the category rankings. Same goes for the categories themselves. With that kind of statistical wiggle room I could likely create any ranking I wished, particularly given the very small differences in the actual and reliable measures of effectiveness for the countries involved.

If one examines statistical data in this area for all the nations in the world one finds large differences between developed and developing countries, and also very large differenced between wealthy nations and relatively modern developing nations ( example Brazil compared to (say) France. However compared to these prevailing differences, the differences among the countries involved in this "study" are trivial indeed.
Baldimo
 
  0  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 10:22 am
@blatham,
Quote:
In 2009, the Senate voted for Obamacare without a single GOP vote.
In 2010, the House voted for Obamacare without a single GOP vote.

By changing the rules in Congress to get it passed. Do you support the GOP changing the rules just so they can pass bills? I doubt you do, the minute they make rules changes, the left is going to throw a hissy fit.
cicerone imposter
 
  4  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 10:26 am
@Debra Law,
Trump is a study of mishaps. He looks completely lost.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  5  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 10:32 am
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:
Quote:
In 2009, the Senate voted for Obamacare without a single GOP vote.In 2010, the House voted for Obamacare without a single GOP vote.
By changing the rules in Congress to get it passed. Do you support the GOP changing the rules just so they can pass bills?
So now there are different rules than in 2009/2010?
Debra Law
 
  2  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 10:38 am
@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:

Gorsuch being confirmed will be the worst out of all the other bad events because he will be on the Supreme Court for a long, long time. He is fairly young and as right wing as Scalia, if not more so.


In other words, the poor, the sick, the disabled, the elderly will lose so much they'll get tired of losing and just lay down and die in servitude to God and Country. And the remaining bulk of the people, the working classes and small business owners, will dutifully slave away as their cumulative wealth is transferred to the upper stratospheres. Everyone will be happy . . . or not.

Really, though, where is America headed? Hopefully, we get smart before we repeat this history:

http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/did-marie-antoinette-really-say-let-them-eat-cake

Watch the short video (2.49 min.), listen carefully and think . . .
0 Replies
 
thack45
 
  4  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 10:46 am
@blatham,
There was such a sudden halt to his usage of "believe me" that I figured his advisors actually convinced him that it's his most obvious hucksterism
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 10:53 am
@wmwcjr,
Alex Jones is a truly horrible human. There are a lot of people making big money by duping a credulous rightwing base but Jones is among the worst. I hope they decide to sue him into non-viability.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 11:01 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Were you under some illusion that it passed by straight votes in Congress and ended up on Obama's desk?

http://www.briansussman.com/politics/how-obamacare-became-law/
blatham
 
  5  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 11:04 am
@georgeob1,
Quote:
The Commonwealth Fund is and advocacy group for government managed health care programs.

First, you'll need to show credible data backing up that claim in a manner which shows a prejudice that disadvantages private systems or colors research. It was established in 1918. I could add research from WHO or OECD or others. What research sources are you using?
thack45
 
  3  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 11:28 am
The failing fake NYT is at it again
Quote:
President Trump’s failure to make good on his signature promise to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act is the most crushing political defeat of his early days in the White House.

But it is hardly the only one.

Mr. Trump — who sold himself as a winner who could turn around a country that “doesn’t win anymore” — has endured a litany of missteps, controversies, resignations and investigations, all of which have dented his “I alone can fix it” vow to remake government with businesslike efficiency.

A month shy of the 100-day mark that presidents use to gauge success, Mr. Trump’s largely self-inflicted setbacks are evidence of a novice politician, often uninterested in the inner workings of government, who is struggling to wield his constitutional authority or fully understand the limits of his office.

“No administration has ever been off to a worse 100-day start,” said Steve Schmidt, a longtime Republican strategist who served as a counselor to Vice President Dick Cheney.

http://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/25/us/politics/trump-policy-goals-missteps.html

What all of the deceitful haters don't realize is, our axiomatically proven super genius president is an unwavering follower of the disciplines of Sun Tzu. For if you are the smartest person on the planet, appear to be the stupidest, most bumbling idiot the world has ever seen. Pure brilliance.
georgeob1
 
  -2  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 11:43 am
@blatham,
Read the mission statement and history of the Commonwealth Fund.

I don't need to do anything. I happen to know a great deal about mathematics and statistical analysis. I outlined for you the omissions and defects in their methodology, and noted correctly that the methods they used could easily have established any ranking among the handful of nations they chose - chiefly because all are very prosperous and enjoy far better health care than any other nations in the world, and that the very small statistical differences among them are more likely to derive from other lifestyle factors and population mobility than health care.

Look up the statistical data for life expectancy, infant mortality and survival data for diseases like cancer. You'll find that the nations in the Commonwealth survey occupy a tiny compact cluster at the top, and that the differences within this cluster are trivial compared to the differences among subgroups or individual nations below them.

The rest you can find in any basic text in statistics, or just in thinking about the many unquantified (and in some cases unquantifiable ) subjective attributes in their study.

The report was merely a listing of their opinions, with as deceptive veneer of statistics to make it look convincing. That's what advocacy groups do.

Perhaps you aren't as widely read as you imagine.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 11:43 am
@thack45,
That's brilliance? It's plain idiotic.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 11:49 am
This being attributed to Ryan today:
Paul Ryan: 'We're not going to give up on destroying the health care system'
Freudian Slip?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 11:54 am
@edgarblythe,
Truth comes out in unexpected ways.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  -3  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 11:56 am
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

This being attributed to Ryan today:
Paul Ryan: 'We're not going to give up on destroying the health care system'
Freudian Slip?


Probably was, but in reference to the ACA mandated system, not health care generally.
Fil Albuquerque
 
  2  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 11:58 am
@edgarblythe,
Sheeesh...that is plain shocking for European ears!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 11:59 am
@georgeob1,
It was actually a gaffe, not his intent.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Sat 25 Mar, 2017 12:04 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Quote:
California’s clean-air agency voted on Friday to push ahead with stricter emissions standards for cars and trucks, setting up a potential legal battle with the Trump administration over the state’s plan to reduce planet-warming gases.



This could be fun, eh!?

Quote:
[California's] standards would require automakers to nearly double the average fuel economy of new cars and trucks by 2025, to 54.5 miles per gallon.

Automakers now complain about the steep technical challenge that the stringent standards pose. They have estimated that only about 3.5 percent of new vehicles are able to reach it, and that their industry would have to spend a “staggering” $200 billion by 2025 to comply.

Automakers have also been critical of a California’s zero-emission vehicle program, which requires automakers to sell a certain percentage of electric cars and trucks in California.

California can write its own standards because of a longstanding waiver granted under the Clean Air Act.

The vote, by the California Air Resources Board, is the boldest indication yet of California’s plan to stand up to President Trump’s agenda. Leading politicians in the state, from the governor down to many mayors, have promised to lead the resistance to Mr. Trump’s policies.

The administration could choose to revoke California’s waiver, at which point experts expect the state would sue.

California sued the George W. Bush administration after it challenged California’s waiver in 2007. Mr. Obama reversed the federal challenge.

The Trump administration’s move to ease emissions rules is the first part of an expected assault on Mr. Obama’s environmental legacy. In the coming weeks, Mr. Trump is also expected to announce that he will direct the E.P.A. to dismantle Obama-era regulations on pollution from coal-fired power plant.


Hmmm, I wonder why those cheese-eatin Californians didn't require that all cars get 100 mpg, eh? Better yet, 200 mpg. Or 300 mpg. They wouldn't care if consumers have to pay a million dollars for a new car and/or if the Auto never sold another car in their state again because their idiotic demands are impossible to meet. They are "standing up to Trump," by God!!

 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 3.28 seconds on 11/24/2024 at 03:53:00