192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
giujohn
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 08:18 am
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

We all know Trump won. However, many are having buyer's remorse. His approval rating is 37%; the lowest in two decades.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/12/donald-trumps-approval-rating-lowest-president-elect-two-decades/

Obama had 92% approval rating, and Trump had 16% approval rating. See the difference?


Yes...Yes I do. That means Trump is President and Hillary and Obammy are not.
giujohn
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 08:21 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

That's why Ryan's plan would do. But it is yet unclear as to whether these clowns can even pull it off.


Wanna bet? Put up or shut up.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 08:21 am
@giujohn,
giujohn wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

We all know Trump won. However, many are having buyer's remorse. His approval rating is 37%; the lowest in two decades.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/12/donald-trumps-approval-rating-lowest-president-elect-two-decades/

Obama had 92% approval rating, and Trump had 16% approval rating. See the difference?


Yes...Yes I do. That means Trump is President and Hillary and Obammy are not.


How odd. I see polling data that has Trump at 50% approval and 50% disapproval.
giujohn
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 08:25 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Good question here:
Quote:
Amazing Disgrace
How did Donald Trump—a thrice-married, biblically illiterate sexual predator—hijack the religious right?

Back in August 2015, when Donald Trump’s presidential ambitions were widely considered a joke, Russell Moore was worried. A prominent leader of the Southern Baptist Convention, the nation’s largest Protestant denomination, Moore knew that some of the faithful were falling for Trump, a philandering, biblically illiterate candidate from New York City whose lifestyle and views embodied everything the religious right professed to abhor. The month before, a Washington Post poll had found that Trump was already being backed by more white evangelicals than any other Republican candidate.

Moore, a boyish-looking pastor from Mississippi, had positioned himself as the face of the “new” religious right: a bigger-hearted, diversity-oriented version that was squarely opposed to Trump’s “us versus them” rhetoric. Speaking to a gathering of religion reporters in a hotel ballroom in Philadelphia, Moore said that his “first priority” was to combat the “demonizing” and “depersonalizing” of immigrants—people, he pointed out, who were “created in the image of God.” Only by refocusing on such true “gospel” values, Moore believed, could evangelicals appeal to young people who had been fleeing the church in droves, and expand its outreach to African Americans and Latinos. Evangelicals needed to do more than win elections—their larger duty was to win souls. Moore, in short, wanted the Christian right to reclaim the moral high ground—and Trump, in his estimation, was about as low as you could get.
New Republic
Sarah Posner had been covering the religious right for years. This is definitely worth your time.



An interesting question. The answer is that the election has less to do with Donald Trump as it has to do with a referendum on the liberal left and the Democratic Party... May they rest in peace.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 08:34 am
Hillary Clinton was overheard telling her campaign strategists that the "Blue Wall" could not be breached and could safely be relied on.

She said: "Don't worry about the working class. They're firmly in our pockets. They're too damn stupid to ever figure out that we've been ******* them for years."
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  4  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 08:35 am
@layman,
Quote:
Since they are totally unwilling, as well as unable, to comprehend why they lost the elections, and accept their own responsibility for the loss, the Democrats need a scapegoat to blame it all on, to wit: Russia.

Layman, I don't think anyone is seriously blaming the Democrats' defeat on Russia. I think it's pretty well-accepted that HRC was the wrong candidate at the wrong time. It doesn't matter whether or not Russia was single-handedly responsible for her loss — the investigation is to determine why the contacts were made, why they were denied, and what actually happened. I think your guys would want to know what was going on if the situation were reversed because it's quite unusual for a campaign to dispatch emissaries to adversarial nations, right?
giujohn
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 08:37 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:

Quote:

DNI head Clapper lies to Congress.

Former CIA and FBI head John Brennan lies to and illegally spies on Congress.

Former CIA head Richard Helms convicted of lying to Congress.

Former CIA head Michael Hayden list to Congress.

Except that doesn't mean they're lying in this case. We won't know the truth of their statements until we have the results of the investigation.


Uh...Yeah... I think it's in the job description, lying to Congress.
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 08:39 am
@McGentrix,
McGentrix wrote:

giujohn wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

We all know Trump won. However, many are having buyer's remorse. His approval rating is 37%; the lowest in two decades.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/12/donald-trumps-approval-rating-lowest-president-elect-two-decades/

Obama had 92% approval rating, and Trump had 16% approval rating. See the difference?


Yes...Yes I do. That means Trump is President and Hillary and Obammy are not.


How odd. I see polling data that has Trump at 50% approval and 50% disapproval.


Uh..Yeah... I think we can put the issue of polls to bed after all the ones that said that Hillary was going to win.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 08:40 am
@hightor,
Quote:
...it's quite unusual for a campaign to dispatch emissaries to adversarial nations, right?


Heh, ya think?

That's exactly what Hillary's hatchetmen did---paid people to go collect "dirt" on Trump from Russian intelligence agents, ya know?
giujohn
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 08:43 am
Hey... What happened to Cammie... I don't see him around anymore. Did he die? I just want to know where to send flowers.
layman
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 08:47 am
@layman,
And, needless to say, the cheese-eaters are quite quick to forget about this:

Quote:
FLASHBACK: Bill Clinton Collected Donations, Then US Missile Tech Shipped To China


Former President Bill Clinton approved the sale of sensitive U.S. missile technology to China following donations from a key missile manufacturer to his campaign, in a move prescient of the Clinton Foundation’s “pay-to-play” activities.


http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/02/flashback-bill-clinton-collected-donations-then-us-missile-tech-shipped-to-china/
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 08:50 am
@giujohn,
giujohn wrote:

Hey... What happened to Cammie... I don't see him around anymore. Did he die? I just want to know where to send flowers.


I heard he was doing some "experiments" with explosives, trying to prove they destroyed the WTC, and made a little "mistake," eh? Now he can tell his tale to the Devil, at least, eh?
giujohn
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 08:53 am
@layman,
layman wrote:

giujohn wrote:

Hey... What happened to Cammie... I don't see him around anymore. Did he die? I just want to know where to send flowers.


I heard he was doing some "experiments" with explosives, trying to prove they destroyed the WTC, and made a little "mistake," eh? Now he can tell his tale to the Devil, at least, eh?


Very sad...That nitro's a bitch to work with.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 08:54 am
@hightor,
Quote:

Layman, I don't think anyone is seriously blaming the Democrats' defeat on Russia.


Apparently you don't get out much, eh, Hi?
gungasnake
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 09:05 am
http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=68972
layman
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 09:10 am
@gungasnake,
Quote:
U.S. State Department Tied To Child Trafficking Operation With Billionaire Epstein (Video)

Evidence has emerged that the U.S. State Department is tied to a child trafficking operation involving Billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. According to internet detectives, one of Epstein’s aircraft which was linked to the trafficking of underage girls is actually owned and operated by the U.S. State Department.

As an attorney....I wrote about Billionaire financier and Bill Clinton best bud Jeffrey Epstein, who spent 13 months in prison and home detention for solicitation and procurement of minors for prostitution at a place known as“orgy island.” The article below has uncovered another Epstein connection.

...in the video below, I review just a few of the relevant but and largely ignored emails by said “fact checkers.” Also, for your reference, the emails are linked directly to the source so there is no confusion about where the material I am discussing comes from, and no cries of “conspiracy theory.”
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 09:30 am
@hightor,
Ya know, it's criminal, a felony, in fact, to record someone's conversations without their consent. But, for some damn reason, God only know what, but some reason, I've never heard a cheese-eater condemn the source of Trump's illegally procured pussy-grabbing video. I aint seen no dramatic outcry for an investigation into what criminal is behind that particular brand of "election interference."

Same with all the feloniously disclosed classified information about Trump which is illegally published by the media.

Kinda strange, doncha think?
layman
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 09:37 am
@layman,
Every stooge in the world, whether from India, China, France, Russia, or wherever is free to get on the internet and express his opinions for the express purpose of trying to influence the opinions of others. This type of "election interference" can't be tolerated, I tellya!
McGentrix
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 09:38 am
@layman,
layman wrote:

Ya know, it's criminal, a felony, in fact, to record someone's conversations without their consent.


Depends on where you live. Most states have a one party rule where at least one party has to consent to recording. But not both.

Ugh, that's something Walter would have said...
layman
 
  -1  
Tue 21 Mar, 2017 09:41 am
@McGentrix,
Quote:
Depends on where you live. Most states have a one party rule where at least one party has to consent to recording. But not both.


Really Gent? I've never heard of that before. So if I want to secretly record my conversations with you, I just "consent" to it, as one party, that the idea?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.49 seconds on 05/15/2025 at 03:26:22