@blatham,
blatham wrote:
I saw that, Walter. This administration certainly runs a disciplined and coherent messaging campaign. I guess that incoherence might be unavoidable given who's at the top.
I think you are merely distracted by the possibly deliberate (or at least knowingly tolerated) cacophony that often accompanies ab outcome oriented leader. Progressives and the Obama folks were very focused on messages, appropriate citations of their sappy group values, and even tedious repetition of stock phrases, etc. Those who didn't hew the line were quickly removed. However Obama & co weren't focused on outcomes at all. The results the obtained repeatedly showed that.
The details of the Obama care legislation were fraught with errors and contradictions, a few remedied by an overgenerous Supreme Court. many others by arbitrary and (in some cases illegal) Executive action. Even after these issues were worked out, it turned out that the insurance cost far more than was expected; the young and healthy didn't sign up; and the competition foreseen in the government-managed market didn't appear. In short the outcome was a disaster. (It turned out that real human beings didn't behave as Professors Ezekiel Emanuel and Jonathan Gruber forecast.)
Same goes for Foreign policy, as we saw a string of disasters starting with the apology tour, the destabilization of the Middle East, the failed Arab Spring and continuing through revolution, ignored "red Lines" and the disintegration of governments from Libya to Iraq and the Horn of Africa. Good intentions and focused messages all the way, but a long string of bad outcomes and disasters nevertheless. The world is much worse off as a result.
I guess they think it's OK as most progressives insist on being judged by the goodness of their intentions as opposed to the results they actually achieve.
Real leaders are focused on results and outcomes as opposed to "messaging" and stock phrases. They often appoint strong deputies and tolerate the different perspective that accompany them precisely to maintain a focus on actually achieving the results they are aiming at in an always disorderly and often unpredictable real world ( as opposed to the imaginary world of groupthink and "predictable" behaviors the Emanuel's , Gruber's , and Obama's inhabit.