192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
layman
 
  -2  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 10:51 am
@blatham,
Sho nuff. Trump set they sorry ass up, yet again, eh?

As some guy put it, Rivera's Capone vault episode has finally be exceeded as the most over-hyped piece of crap ever seen on TV, eh?

The media walks into these traps every time, without fail.

Trump plays them like a pinball machine.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 10:52 am
@djjd62,
I already live where I was born.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -1  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 10:54 am
@hightor,
Trump would be a damn fool to make his complete tax returns public. You don't EVER give your competitors any clues about your successful methods and areas of activity. Just like we don't publicize the names and locations of CIA agents operating overseas.
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  0  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 10:55 am
@Olivier5,
Quote:
Not all of us have been homogenized


Smile
layman
 
  0  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 10:56 am
@camlok,
camlok wrote:

Quote:
Not all of us have been homogenized


Smile


Tryin to say ya aint no homo? Yeah, right, eh?
Baldimo
 
  0  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 10:56 am
@hightor,
Quote:
You've got it backwards — the media call for him to release his returns is nothing less than an effort to remove questions of impropriety and thereby legitimize Trump's presidency.

Considering the media was in Hillary's pocket, they didn't care about impropriety, as liberals they were interested in using his lack of paying high taxes against him. It was more class warfare, nothing more nothing less. They wanted to see his effective tax rate was and use it as a weapon. That can be proven by the way the liberal media has reacted to this tax release. He only paid $31 million in taxes on $150 million income, that is the story.
blatham
 
  3  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 11:00 am
@revelette1,
The a hell of a good piece, rev. Very helpful. I hope everyone reads it with some care.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  0  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 11:00 am
@Baldimo,
Ask any cheese-eater and they will tell you that he should have paid 149 million in taxes on 150 million in earnings, ya know?

A million a year is far more than anyone deserves. Everything over that deserve to go to THEM.

If they got their way, they would kill just about ever job in the country, and they would kill the host they feed on as parasites.

They aint none too bright, know what I'm sayin?
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  0  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 11:00 am
@layman,
Typically lame, layman.

Why are you, an "honest, get at the issues and discuss them thoroughly" conservative avoiding the tough questions?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 11:01 am
@maporsche,
Good point, maporsche
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  -2  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 11:04 am
@layman,
layman wrote:

Olivier5 wrote:

At some point I had questions like "How are you?" voted down... It's not about what is posted, it's about WHO posts it. Some folks focus on the social aspect of A2K -- the disputes, the alliances, etc. -- more than on content.


Blathy seems to think these fans actually read the posts they vote down, eh, Ollie? I got a few that follow me all around like yapping little puppy-dawgs nipping at my pant cuffs. The downvotes are INSTANTANEOUS.


Yeah, I get that too. It's like a plague that runs just beneath the surface of A2K.
Baldimo
 
  0  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 11:04 am
@camlok,
Quote:
The US military is a communist organization. It is a commune, where everything is taken care of for the masses, the masses have no say, their heads are filled with 24 hours a day propaganda, ... .

You continue to show you really have no idea what you are talking about. Since I'm guessing you have never served in any military you don't have the slightest idea of what military life is like.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 11:06 am
@revelette1,
Quote:
Re: izzythepush (Post 6383722)
Actually, I agree with Rubio on this. It was the same as when Sara Palin put cross hairs (correct term, maybe I should look it up?) on democrats. It encourages violence.

I think Britain may be rather different than the US in this. The Brits don't shoot their leaders like the US does. But aside from that, what Snoop did was politically stupid in that its exactly the sort of gesture that the right media use effectively to paint black males as dangerous or murderous criminals.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  0  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 11:08 am
If a guy like Trump takes huge risks, and makes them pay off, the cheese-eaters want all the rewards.

On the other hand, if the risk results in a loss, that's exclusively Trump's problem. They bitch like crazy if he's allowed to offset that loss against taxable gain.

Just the way a commie-ass loser would think, sho nuff
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 11:09 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
At the time I remember Republicans banging on about freedom of speech. Rubio would have a lot more credibility had he criticised Palin back then.

That's true as well. On the other hand, if Snoop himself found Palin's act disagreeable, he ought not to have done something similar. There's a sound rationale, moral and political I think, in Obama's formulation of "when they go low, we go high". We all fail at this sometimes but it's the proper direction to strive.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 11:10 am
@layman,
Quote:
Now they call themselves "progressives."

Leftists have cloaked themselves in the vale of "progressives", but progressivism no longer has a function. A majority of the things progressives pushed for have become a reality and it's not all bad. Just like the race pimps, progressives are now having to produce new groups to "support" but the vale is slipping and we know that "progressives" are leftists and have always had the same aims, create a need for socialism and push it into every aspect of American life.
McGentrix
 
  4  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 11:12 am
The story on the 2005 returns, as I understand it, was that someone leaked the documents to a source that gave them to Maddow. Maddow's people then went to the White House and said "Hey, we have these, are they real?" Inresponse Trump allowed his forms to be released for that year.

That is how Maddow was able to show them on TV and talk about them. Maddow may be a terrible person from a conservative's point of view but she understands the law and is smart enough to follow it.
camlok
 
  0  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 11:17 am
@McGentrix,
Quote:
Maddow may be a terrible person from a conservative's point of view


That would be because she often tells the truth.
blatham
 
  3  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 11:18 am
@Olivier5,
That's brilliant, Oliver. Immediate urge on my part to pick up a drum or some sticks and join in.

And there's the whole area of cross-cultural collaborations. Aside from Paul Simon, Ry Cooder has done some wonderful collaborations with artists from other traditions. And then there's this classic with Gabriel and Youssou N'Dour (who is a freaking genius).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JduG0nT1Q3s
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  0  
Wed 15 Mar, 2017 11:19 am
@McGentrix,
McGentrix wrote:

Maddow may be a terrible person from a conservative's point of view but she understands the law and is smart enough to follow it.


I aint so sure about that, eh, Gent? She said, on the air, that the first amendment gives her the "right" to publish private tax returns.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.44 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 09:29:29