@blatham,
It's hard to tell here just what is your complaint about the progress of swamp draining. It was very clear that Trump's main focus here with the swamp reference was to the growing body of bureaucratric elements in our government; growing the usurpation of legislative perogatives by the Federal bureaucracy; and the paralysis of our Congress under the former hammers of Obama vetoes, Harry Reid's refusals to bring House passed legislatineven up for debate and also divisions among Republicans in the Congress.
I do believe Trump erred in promising to address Obamacare first. The present structure of this ill-conceived and overly complex law was fast headed for a financial collapse on its own: the next round of annual updates will yield less competition among insurers as they abandon the market, fast rising rates; and immediate needs for added Federal funds to subsidize the mess. That will be the ideal time for repeal and revision.
Beyond that I believe he is making fast progress, despite Democrat hysteria and theatrics, and the mostly invisible resistance of major elements of the Federal Bureaucracy. As Trump's appointees take up the reins of power in the various Federal Departments ther process will accelerate- we have already seen action on the traditional replacement of Federal attorneys across the country ( though Democrat apologists appear to have forgotten that this is merely a routine action) tasken by every administration. Other actions to eliminate bureaucratic regulatory excesses are continuing at a rapid pace.
I suspect we may see some actions relative to the various labor unions now infesting the government. I suspect some actions similar to those taken a few years ago in Wisconsin to weaken and get rid of them. A good start might be to eliminate the "shop stewards" the unions invariably negotiate ( up to about 5% of the workforce) . These are union employees, whose salaries are paid by the government to do union business in Federal offices. Our Civil Service law stipulaated that employee pay, benefits and working conditions are exclusively a government function and responsibility. I have never understood just what Federal unions do for the huge sums they collect (think of about 2.2% of the entire Federal labor budget - and that doesn't even count the billions spent on the salaries of their "shop stewards" ). The next step could be to stop prediscounting union dues from employee pay, and let the unions collect them from their "voluntary" members. (In Wisconsin, given the choice most quit the unions.)