Sessions appears to have said two things:
Quote:“I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians.”
That was in response to Franken's question. But he did have conversations with Russians.
Then, after conceding that he did speak with the R ambassador, his office said that Sessions
Quote:“did not consider the conversations relevant to the lawmakers’ questions and did not remember in detail what he discussed with Kislyak.”
Quote:Why would Sessions talk to an official with the Russian government? Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) noted overnight that she’s been on the Senate Armed Services Committee for a decade, and she’s never had any reason to call or meet with the Russian ambassador. What’s more, the Washington Post talked to 20 senators who were on the committee in 2016 – from both parties – and not one of them had communicated with the Russian ambassador.
Sessions, however, had two separate meetings. He says the communications were “superficial” and unimportant, but we have no idea if that’s true. We also don’t know why he’d take steps to conceal conversations that were anodyne.
It’d also be interesting to know if Sessions had other routine meetings with the Russian ambassador prior to 2016, or if this was unique to last year’s election period.
Benen
And one can ask why, if Sessions couldn't remember what he talked about, how he can stipulate he didn't talk about X or Y.