@coldjoint,
Quote:No there has not. And there are plenty of leaks that the sources you trust omit or lie about.
And yet more to your conspiracy theory, because your views rely on:
- not seeing me admit to irregularities quite frequently. Your belief otherwise is a deception you tell yourself.
- not seeing me asking legitimate questions to see if irregularities go beyond that into fraud (which you can almost never answer...the sheer volume of this pattern suggests fraud in the opposite direction)
- not seeing the sheer volume of court cases that have gone against your position (which again suggests fraud in the opposite direction)
- the 'leaks' you have provided (so far as I remember, being one post office worker - who's information was so dodgy as to be unbelievable by anyone who gave even the remotest amount of thought to it. And no, an observer doesn't count as a leak - for they vrey obviously wouldn't be part of the alleged conspiracy)
On the other side:
- you ignore the volume of people required (the more people involved, the hard it is to keep a conspiracy quiet)
- you ignore how many different groups are allegedly involved in your conspiracy theory (the more groups involved, the hard it is to keep a conspiracy quiet / no leaks...ie in this case, it would be almost impossible)
- you ignore the lack of motivation for such a wide spread conspiracy (particularly among the workers).
- Explicitly, you ignore (for the number of people involved) the lack of leaks
- you ignore the lack of information needed to take an irregularity from such to fraud
- you never ask of the irregular votes "How many were for Trump and how many were for Biden" (you just chant 'fraud)
- you ignore that in the post office 'leak' you produced, it would be impossible to hire 'all democrats' without someone complaining about discrimination (I mean seriously, asking your political views on a resume or in an interview is virtually impossible to get away with)
- you have
one office where people were told to go home, and then counting continued. There's no information on the votes tallies (could all have been for Trump for all you know...but you ignore this)
Where in that is your complaint about me believing dubious sources? You've been challenged to provide what isn't factual about what I say before...without being able to do so. Your general tactic has been to ignore what you don't want to see.
Really, you complaining about other people being blinded...is simply you seeing only what you want to see, and closing your eyes to anything else.
