192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 05:12 pm
Quote:
With today’s additions of Wyoming and Ohio, a total of 21 states – including Texas – are signed on or seek to be signed on to the Supreme Court lawsuit challenging the elections in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin.

Since Texas filed the suit, over 20 states have joined or expressed an interest in joining. As it now stands, the following states are seeking a Supreme Court remedy to the November 3 election: Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Arizona, Utah, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Indiana, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Ohio, West Virginia, and Florida.

Right now that breaks down to 42% of America suing 8% of America. Hopefully other states will step up and join.
https://nationalfile.com/update-21-states-now-support-texas-scotus-lawsuit-42-of-america-to-sue-8-of-america/
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 05:33 pm
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 05:37 pm
cj, one more thing concerning your message to me awhile go. With your record, I don't know if I can trust it; you are as liable to lie as to taking a breath.

Anyways, it is good you don't have a gun. You are not in enough command of your senses to own one. You seem about to go off the handle all the time. You would probably go out to one of your Proud Boy or KKK (or some such type local group) gathering and off someone for sure; at a moments notice.

Just don't buy one, OK - it's good advise, follow it (if you don't really own one already, if you do - get rid of it, now).

coldjoint
 
  -1  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 05:44 pm
@BillW,
BillW wrote:

cj, one more thing concerning your message to me awhile go. With your record, I don't know if I can trust it; you are as liable to lie as to taking a breath.

Anyways, it is good you don't have a gun. You are not in enough command of your senses to own one. You seem about to go off the handle all the time. You would probably go out to one of your Proud Boy or KKK (or some such type local group) gathering and off someone for sure; at a moments notice.

Just don't buy one, OK - it's good advise, follow it (if you don't really own one already, if you do - get rid of it, now).



This is not about me. You are insufferable. Stop gossiping and grow up.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 05:47 pm
@coldjoint,
Ya, because SCOTUS is going to rule differently than the 53 courts that laughed the charges out of the room. Somehow all the 'evidence' is going to change when it's couriered to a different building!
Brand X
 
  2  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 05:49 pm
@hightor,
Trump came into office a shithead and he's going to leave a shithead, and **** all over the WH steps on the way out.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 05:51 pm
Quote:
LIVESTREAM: Rally At Bethpage, NY USPS Facility…Where’s The FBI?

I guess the media thought the country was going to roll over and play dead. They are wrong again, which at least makes them consistent.
Quote:
And as Bethpage voters invited Rep. Lee Zeldin to join their Thursday protest outside of the local USPS office, several residents want answers from the FBI over the missing truckload of PA ballots.

Residents Want Answers from FBI:

Why is the FBI harassing the truck driver/whistleblower and his family instead of investigating what happened to the missing truckload of 288,000 filled-out ballots?
Why Were 288,000 PA Ballots in Bethpage?
Why did local FBI officials drop the ball instead of protecting and serving its constituents?

Voters throughout Long Island will converge outside of the Bethpage, USPS this Thursday from 4:00 – 6:00 pm demanding answers from USPS officials and the FBI over allegations of interstate ballot harvesting. The USPS office is located at 288 Grumman Road W, Bethpage, NY.

FRAUD.
https://creativedestructionmedia.com/video/2020/12/10/livestream-rally-at-bethpage-ny-usps-facility-wheres-the-fbi/
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 05:51 pm
@Brand X,
Brand X wrote:

Ya, because SCOTUS is going to rule differently than the 53 courts that laughed the charges out of the room. Somehow all the 'evidence' is going to change when it's couriered to a different building!


Don't forget that a lot of this 'evidence' was seen by SCOTUS already and laughed out of court without even commenting on it in the previous case they agreed to look at!
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 06:02 pm
@BillW,
BillW wrote:

Brand X wrote:

Ya, because SCOTUS is going to rule differently than the 53 courts that laughed the charges out of the room. Somehow all the 'evidence' is going to change when it's couriered to a different building!


Don't forget that a lot of this 'evidence' was seen by SCOTUS already and laughed out of court without even commenting on it in the previous case they agreed to look at!

Where are the responses from the states in question? They have been filed. Why aren't they posted like the Texas case was?

You know why? Because they cannot say they followed the law in those states or deny took advantage of the pandemic to make illegal exceptions therefore trashing the integrity of those elections.

If you find one, post it.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 06:08 pm
Quote:
“All the unconstitutional changes to election procedures identified in the Bill of Complaint have two common features: (1) They abrogated statutory safeguards against fraud that responsible observers have long recommended for voting by mail, and (2) they did so in a way that predictably conferred partisan advantage on one candidate in the presidential election,” the Missouri brief from Wednesday, which was joined by 16 other states, said.

https://hannity.com/media-room/breaking-six-more-states-ask-to-join-texas-supreme-court-election-case/#.X9KRIp4_pzo.twitter
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 06:10 pm
@Brand X,
Brand X wrote:

Trump came into office a shithead and he's going to leave a shithead, and **** all over the WH steps on the way out.

Haters going to hate.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 06:26 pm
Quote:
Pennsylvania

Facts:

Vote Tally: 3,445,548 for Biden and 3,363,951 for Trump – margin 81,597.
Requests for mail-in ballots 70% Democrats and 25% Republicans.
Mail-in ballots increased from 266,208 in 2016 to over 3,000,000 in 2020.

Violations of Election Law:

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

The Secretary of State unilaterally abrogated signature verification requirements for mail-in ballots.
PA supreme court changed existing deadline for receiving mail-in ballots from 8:00 PM on the day of election to 3 days after the election and adopted a presumption that non-postmarked ballots be considered as valid.
Election officials in Philadelphia and Allegheny Counties did not follow state law permitting poll-watchers to be present for the opening, counting, and recording of mail-in ballots.
The Secretary of State directed election officials to remove ballots before 7:00 AM on the day of election in order to “cure” defective mail-in ballots. This was done only in Democrat majority counties.
Election officials did not segregate ballots received after 8:00 PM on election day breaking the promise made to the U.S. Supreme Court thus making it impossible to identify or remove those ballots.

Evidence of Fraud:

Ballots with no mailed date: 9,005 (no evidence they were sent to a voter)
Ballots returned on or before the mailed date: 58,221
Ballots returned one day after the mailed date: 51,200 (Perhaps not impossible, but highly unlikely for the average voter to receive a ballot, fill it out, place it in the mail and have it returned the next day.)
On Nov 2, the day before the election, PA reports that 2.7 million ballots had been sent out. On Nov 4 that number had increased to 3.1 million — an increase of 400,000 mail-in ballots at election time with literally no reasonable chance of them being used by legitimate voters.

That is one.
https://ussanews.com/News1/2020/12/10/the-texas-election-lawsuit-simplified/
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 06:30 pm
Quote:
Georgia

Facts:

Vote Tally: 2,472,098 for Biden and 2,458,121 for Trump – margin 12,670.
Mail-in ballots: 65.32% for Biden and 34.68% for Trump.
Mail-in ballots increased from 213,033 in 2016 to 1,305,659 in 2020.

Violations of Election Law:


The Secretary of State unilaterally abrogated signature verification requirements for mail-in ballots.
The Secretary of State authorized opening and processing mail-in ballots up to three weeks before election day when the law prohibits that until after the polls open on election day.
The Secretary of State materially weakened the security requirements for ballot rejection based on signature verification or other missing information.

Evidence of Fraud:

Mail-in ballot rejection rate for missing or inaccurate information or for non-matching signatures decreased from 6.42% in 2016 to .36% in 2020. Rejecting 2020 ballots at the same rate as 2016 would have resulted in a net gain of 25,587 votes for Trump – twice the number needed to overcome Biden’s count. With a six-fold increase in the number of mail-in ballots, reason would indicate that the rejection rate would increase, or at least stay the same, with so many first-time mail-in ballots.

Two. These are what the Texas case is bringing
https://ussanews.com/News1/2020/12/10/the-texas-election-lawsuit-simplified/.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 06:33 pm
Quote:
Michigan


Facts:

Vote Tally: 2,796,702 for Biden and 2,650,695 for Trump – margin 146,007.
In 2016 587,618 voters requested mail-in ballots. In 2020 3.2 million votes were cast by mail-in ballot.
Democrats voted by mail at a rate approximately two times that of Republican voters.

Violations of Election Law:

The Secretary of State unilaterally abrogated signature verification requirements for mail-in ballots.
The Secretary of State sent out unsolicited ballots to all 7.7 million registered voters contrary to election law which requires a voter to request a mail-in ballot through a process that includes a signature to be matched with the voter registration.
The Secretary of State also allowed absentee ballots to be requested online without signature verification.
Local election officials in Wayne County — containing 322,925 more ballots for Biden than for Trump — opened and processed mail-in ballots without poll-watchers present.
Local election officials in Wayne County also ignored the strict election law requirements of placing a written statement or stamp on each ballot envelope indicating that the voter signature was in fact checked and verified with the signature on file with the state.

Evidence of Fraud:

174,384 mail-in ballots in Wayne County had no valid registration number, indicating they likely resulted from election workers running the same ballots through the tabulator multiple times.
71% of Wayne County Absent Voter Counting Boards were unbalanced, where the number of people who checked in did not match the number of ballots cast

https://ussanews.com/News1/2020/12/10/the-texas-election-lawsuit-simplified/
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 06:38 pm
Quote:
Wisconsin

Facts:

Vote Tally: 1,630,716 for Biden and 1,610,151 for Trump – margin 20,565.
Mail-in ballots increased from 146,932 in 2016 to 1,275,019 in 2020.

Violations of Election Law:

The Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) positioned hundreds of unmanned illegal drop boxes to collect absentee ballots. (The use of any drop box, manned or unmanned, is directly prohibited by Wisconsin statute. Any alternate mail-in ballot site “shall be staffed by the municipal clerk or the executive director of the board of election commissioners…” “Ballots cast in contravention of the procedures specified in those provisions may not be included in the certified result of any election.”)
The WEC encouraged voters to unlawfully declare themselves “indefinitely confined” in order to avoid security measures like signature verification and photo ID requirements. Nearly 216,000 voters said they were indefinitely confined in the 2020 election, nearly four times as many as in 2016.
Strict laws requiring mail-in voters to certify by signature including the signature of an adult witness were ignored or circumvented by election officials.

Evidence of Fraud:


One hundred thousand ballots were supposedly missing and directed to be “found” after election day.

Quote:
The Texas Election Lawsuit Simplified


https://ussanews.com/News1/2020/12/10/the-texas-election-lawsuit-simplified/
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 07:38 pm
Quote:
Conclusion
Quote:


Quote:
Significant violations of election law that were put into place to protect against election fraud is sufficient to invalidate the results of the elections, apart from whatever evidence is able to be gathered in a short time to show actual numbers of fraudulent ballots. Reason would indicate that there is a high number of fraudulent ballots that are impossible to identify, which is why the election laws pertaining to mail-in ballots were established to begin with.

There is no remedy to correct the Nov 3rd election because ballots that did not adhere to election law cannot be identified as separate from those that did. An accurate count of legal ballots that were cast cannot be made. Therefore, as directed in the Constitution, it falls to the legislature of each state to choose electors as has been done in the past. Failing that, each state may determine not to submit any presidential electors

The Texas lawsuit claims the odds of Biden overcoming Trump’s lead and winning any of the states after the point indicated was one in a quadrillion. And therefore, the odds of winning all four was one in a quadrillion to the fourth power. The lawsuit did not provide information on how that number was determined. This may seem an exaggerated to some. It is enough to state that the odds of winning any one of the states was highly unlikely and the odds of winning all four were extremely unlikely. For example, if the odds of winning any one of the states was numerically much less extreme but still highly unlikely, say something like one in twenty, then the odds of doing that in all four states would be 1 in 160,000. Twenty beans in a jar: 19 white and 1 black. Reach in without looking and be lucky enough to pull out the one black bean. Chances of doing that again is 1 in 400. Clearly indicative of cheating if someone claims to have done that four times in a row. As I said the statistical analysis behind the claim of odds of 1 in a 1,000,000,000,000 are not given so I cannot speak to that. But even if the odds were orders of magnitude better than that, they were still astronomically small. At any rate, the merits of the lawsuit do not depend on any certain level of odds of Biden overcoming a lead that had been established by 3:00 A.M. the day after election.




0 Replies
 
neptuneblue
 
  3  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 09:08 pm
@coldjoint,
What are you even going on about???

Quote:
The Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) positioned hundreds of unmanned illegal drop boxes to collect absentee ballots. (The use of any drop box, manned or unmanned, is directly prohibited by Wisconsin statute. Any alternate mail-in ballot site “shall be staffed by the municipal clerk or the executive director of the board of election commissioners…” “Ballots cast in contravention of the procedures specified in those provisions may not be included in the certified result of any election.”)


False.

Absentee Ballot Drop-off Sites


Atkinson Library, 1960 W Atkinson Ave
Bay View Library, 2566 S Kinnickinnic Ave
Capitol Library, 3969 N 74th St
Center Street Library, 2727 W Fond du Lac Ave
Central Library Centennial Hall, 733 N 8th St
City Hall Complex, 200 E Wells Street (on east side Market St, between City Hall and Zeidler)
East Library, 2320 N Cramer St
Election Commission Warehouse, 1901 S Kinnickinnic Ave
Good Hope Library, 7715 W Good Hope Rd
Martin Luther King Library, 310 W Locust St
Mitchell Street Library, 906 W Historic Mitchell St
Tippecanoe Library, 3912 S Howell Ave
Villard Square Library, 5190 N 35th St
Washington Park Library, 2121 N Sherman Blvd
Zablocki Library, 3501 W Oklahoma Ave


Ballot drop boxes are currently closed until the next election cycle.

https://city.milwaukee.gov/election/Voter-Info/Absentee-Ballot-Drop-Off-Sites

coldjoint
 
  -2  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 09:24 pm
@neptuneblue,
Quote:
Absentee Ballot Drop-off Sites

You do know the difference in ballots? Absentee ballots are requested. These were not all absentee ballots. You got nothing. The fact that they violated their own law without permission of the legislature invalidates those votes and shoots down any chance of claiming integrity.

They got this one and I think everyone knows it.
neptuneblue
 
  2  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 10:01 pm
@coldjoint,
Yes, because everyone who actually went to a poling place decided to NOT drop their ballot there, but drive to the nearest drop box to deposit their ballot....

Sounds legit, brah.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Thu 10 Dec, 2020 10:02 pm
@neptuneblue,
neptuneblue wrote:

Yes, because everyone who actually went to a poling place decided to NOT drop their ballot there, but drive to the nearest drop box to deposit their ballot....

Sounds legit, brah.

Sounds legit is not good enough. The SCOTUS is about to tell you that. Texas will win this case. Biden will not get 270.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.47 seconds on 07/08/2025 at 10:21:16