196
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Rebelofnj
 
  2  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 05:49 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
Those experts are wrong.


Am I to assume you are an expert in Constitutional Law?
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 05:51 pm
@Rebelofnj,
I can hold my own in a legal argument.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 05:51 pm
The big question now is will theRump pardon any more turkeys before execution day - uhh, tomorrow🤗
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 05:57 pm
@Rebelofnj,
Rebelofnj wrote:

According to Trump, Flynn lied to Pence and the FBI.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/937007006526959618?s=20

Judicial Review
The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself.

Oh, and BTW, the Supreme Court does not limit their reviews to be restrained to the borders of the case at hand only. They frequently recite acts that are going on around the country and other actions of the parties in regards to the case at hand. It would not be unlike them to position this case along side the other illegal pardons (Flynn, Stone, others as they occur) and the complete Clown act of this defendant!
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 06:05 pm
Quote:
Raffensperger and Kemp Still Obstructing Election Fraud Audit in Georgia

Quote:
This election was stolen. That becomes increasingly clear with every passing day. How it was stolen varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but a couple of common denominators are clear:

– The presence of Dominion systems; and

– Control of the process by Democrat election officials in big cities like Atlanta, Detroit, Philadelphia and Milwaukee.

The state-level elecion officials are also Democrats in every state under scrutiny save Georgia, where nominal Republican Sec. State Brad Raffensperger was in control and nominal Republican Gov. Brian Kemp appears to have also been involved. Even today, more than three weeks after Election Day came and went, Raffensperger and Kemp are refusing to allow a real audit of the ballots and especially of the mail-in ballots that were so easily defrauded in all of these big cities.

What are they hiding? Why are pages of data being scrubbed from the internet like in PA. Why did the software companies scrub any connections they had?

This kind of resistance makes the fraud more obvious than it already is.

Quote:
Meanwhile, in Michigan… – Another witness came forward with compelling testimony of her personally observing Detroit election workers manually overwriting Trump votes to change them to Biden votes:

Quote:

MICHIGAN.🚨

"THEY WERE *OVERWRITING* BALLOTS."

Articia Bomer, who signed an affidavit testifying to fraud committed in Detroit, gives shocking details of poll workers *overwriting* Trump votes to Biden votes. Revealing. 🗳️👇 pic.twitter.com/jiY1to6bpE

— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) November 25, 2020


https://dbdailyupdate.com/2020/11/25/wednesday-news-roundup-raffensperger-and-kemp-still-obstructing-election-fraud-audit-in-georgia/


roger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 06:21 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Funny!
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 06:31 pm
@Rebelofnj,
Rebelofnj wrote:

According to Trump, Flynn lied to Pence and the FBI.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/937007006526959618?s=20

So what? Everyone knew that but Snood.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 06:54 pm
Quote:
How Odd That 44 States Voted Without Allegations Of Skullduggery


Quote:
It can scarcely be coincidental that in 44 states the election went off smoothly and in most of them almost all of the votes were counted effortlessly within about six hours of the closing of the polls. There have been no allegations whatever of irregularities or skulduggery by Republican-governed states apart from Georgia.

The Democrats began a comprehensive assault on the electoral system several years ago in many states; they consecrated great resources to electing the secretaries of state who effectively administer federal elections within their states; they agitated and litigated in many states to change voting practices and to facilitate ballot harvesting through unsolicited mass mailings to the entirety of the voter rolls and the collection and delivery of ballots with increasingly dubious verification that they represent the will of the voters ostensibly casting them.

And a fact.
Quote:
Special counsel John Durham has dragged his feet unconscionably in not producing a timely analysis of the shady origins of the Trump-Russia collusion fraud. Durham followed upon John Huber, whom former Attorney General Jeff Sessions claimed was investigating the same subject, but he didn’t do anything. There is a disconcerting pattern of endless illegal harassments and obstructions of President Trump and every available legal means must be used to assure that he is not pushed out of office improperly, and by the same measure, if he has lost the election, that that result is the consequence of a fairly conducted and tabulated election.

https://www.nysun.com/national/how-odd-that-44-states-voted-without-allegations/91348/#.X76UOFUtSyk.twitter
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 07:02 pm
@coldjoint,
You idiots, she is saying Overriding", not "overwriting", listen to the videeo again, and I seriously doubt there is any voting machine made that lets you override the markings on a ballot and shift it manually to another candidate with the push of a button, which pretty uch destroys what voting machines are designed specifically to do. Looks overwhelmingly like the witness didn't know what she was seeing and that whoever made that tape had no idea how voting machines actually function.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 07:19 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:

You idiots, she is saying Overriding", not "overwriting", listen to the videeo again, and I seriously doubt there is any voting machine made that lets you override the markings on a ballot and shift it manually to another candidate with the push of a button, which pretty uch destroys what voting machines are designed specifically to do. Looks overwhelmingly like the witness didn't know what she was seeing and that whoever made that tape had no idea how voting machines actually function.

The lady said they were cheating. Look that up in the dictionary.


Quote:
and that whoever made that tape had no idea how voting machines actually function.

And you do?
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 07:25 pm
@coldjoint,
"override" typically means there is a problem with the ballot--like an overvote, voting for more than one candidate for an office for which you can only vote for one candidate, or a blank ballot, voting for no candidate. It doesn't actually change anything on the ballot, as opposed to a hypothetical ""overwrite", which somehow wouldchange a blacked in oval with indelible ink to something else, which woulkd cause the ballot to be rejected as an overvote, noy as a vote for biden. I don't think that witness understood what was happening, and the people who made this post certainly didn't. No wonder the courts keep rejecting these cases.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 07:27 pm
@coldjoint,
Yes, as a matter of fact,I do. Do you?
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 07:35 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:

"override" typically means there is a problem with the ballot--like an overvote, voting for more than one candidate for an office for which you can only vote for one candidate, or a blank ballot, voting for no candidate. It doesn't actually change anything on the ballot, as opposed to a hypothetical ""overwrite", which somehow wouldchange a blacked in oval with indelible ink to something else, which woulkd cause the ballot to be rejected as an overvote, noy as a vote for biden. I don't think that witness understood what was happening, and the people who made this post certainly didn't. No wonder the courts keep rejecting these cases.

So you did not look up cheating?
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 07:36 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:

Yes, as a matter of fact,I do. Do you?

I know they have back doors and can be rigged. I have seen the proof.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 07:43 pm
https://d2pggiv3o55wnc.cloudfront.net/oann/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/GettyImages-1197856943-655x437.jpg

Quote:
President Trump reiterated his victory in this year’s election amid evidence of potential voter fraud.

Speaking via phone during Pennsylvania’s state Senate hearings Wednesday, the President stressed that he won Pennsylvania and other key states by wide margins.

He also highlighted the reports on ballot dumps, phony mail-in ballots and electronic manipulation of votes as the most prominent examples of fraud.

President Trump added ‘Dominion Voting Systems’ is complicit in altering hundreds-of-thousands of votes to steal the election for the Democrats.

https://www.oann.com/president-trump-addresses-pa-senate-i-won-election/
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 07:55 pm
Quote:
VIDEO: “Mysterious” Election Day Spike Gave Biden Nearly 600,000 Votes, Only 3,200 for Trump

No fraud there. They got caught.
https://www.toddstarnes.com/politics/video-mysterious-election-day-spike-gave-biden-nearly-600000-votes-only-3200-for-trump/
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 07:58 pm
Quote:


Should President Trump concede to Biden? Poll Results: No: 190,593 (98.9%) Yes: 2,181 (1.1%) Total Votes: 192,774. @gregkellyusa @newsmax For the good of our Country we must prevail!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 25, 2020
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 08:08 pm
Quote:
Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020
A Quantitative Analysis of Decisive Vote Updates in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia on and after Election Night

Quote:
Conclusion

This report studies 8,954 individual updates to the vote totals in all 50 states and finds that four individual updates — two of which were widely noticed on the internet, including by the President — are profoundly anomalous; they deviate from a pattern which is otherwise found in the vast majority of the remaining 8,950 vote updates. The findings presented by this report [28]suggest that four vote count updates — which collectively were decisive in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, and thus decisive of a critical forty-two electoral votes — are especially anomalous and merit further investigation.

In particular, the finding that the broader data follows general patterns and our ability to measure just how much any individual vote update does — or doesn’t — follow this pattern allows us to make concrete claims about both how extreme any given vote update is and about what any particular vote update might have looked like, had it been less extreme one one axis or another.

We further find that if these updates were only more extreme than 99% of all updates nationally in terms of their deviation from this generally-observed pattern, that, holding all else equal, Joe Biden may very well have lost the states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, and that he would have 42 fewer Electoral votes — putting Biden below the number required to win the Presidency. Either way, it is indisputable that his margin of victory in these three states relies on four most anomalous vote updates identified by the metric developed in this report.

We once again note that this analysis is largely restricted to four individual vote updates out of a sample of nearly 9,000. This report by no means suggests stopping investigations in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, or elsewhere; it is merely that these four key ballot updates are both profoundly anomalous with respect to a metric which removes any component of different states having different partisan leanings or a different number of voters. Furthermore, this analysis does not require that we regard the final vote totals in any of these states (or counties thereof) as suspicious, nor, critically, does it require that we accept that the observed data should follow any particular distribution a priori. We merely show that the data, adjusted appropriately to remove differences in size and political leaning between states, does follow a certain pattern, and that four key vote updates deviate profoundly from that pattern.

It is our belief that the extraordinarily anomalous nature of the studied vote updates here, combined with the staggering political implications, demands immediate and thorough investigation.


https://votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 08:32 pm
Quote:
Dominion’s Eric Coomer who literally wrote the Antifa Manifesto on his Facebook in endless disturbed rants in foaming hate for President Trump installed “Update software” on over 30,000 #Georgia machines RIGHT BEFORE THE ELECTION!

Quote:
He said the software upgrade is being made without adequate security testing or certification from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. But Coomer said the change is minor and doesn’t require recertification.

He does not have that authority.
Quote:

Social media is swarming around the claims that a current (or former, as his position has been scrubbed from the internet) vice-president with Dominion Voter Systems who previously admitted that it was possible for hackers to hack into their voting systems, allegedly, posted several anti-cop, anti-Trump and, frankly anti-American social media posts.

If you search the company’s profile Eric Coomer has since been removed from their page of directors.

I wonder why?
https://redstatenation.com/the-anti-trump-dominion-ceo-eric-coomer-who-wrote-an-antifa-manifesto-on-his-facebook-page-installed-update-software-on-over-30000-georgia-machines-right-before-the-election/
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2020 08:50 pm
https://grrrgraphics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/joe_biden_thanksgiving-1536x1108.jpg
BTW the red thing hanging from Biden's nose is a called a snood.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/17/2021 at 04:25:49