monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

The rule against hearsay seems simple, but it is full of exceptions - for instance if affidavits (business records) include a hearsay within hearsay, the record still needs to meet the authenticity requirement.

But cj certainly can teach me better about the various exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay Evidence. (A short subsumption will do.)

coldjoint wrote:

neptuneblue wrote:

coldjoint wrote:

No it hasn't. Who has debunked the exact ratios?

The American people did, when they tallied over six million votes more than for Trump.

Pretty shitty answer. The stats will hold up in court. Your answer will not.

Be sure to let us know when you hear of any court finding that there was widespread fraud, or that the SC has decided to hear Trump's case.

Wouldn't want to miss that - that would be blockbuster.

Big voter fraud information coming out concerning Georgia. Stay tuned!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 21, 2020

Conservative SCOTUS judges get assigned federal cases in battleground states

In addition to providing oversight of cases that are brought within their respective circuits, Wiles explained the justices also have the authority to decide which ones can be brought before the full Supreme Court (where four justices have to agree to hear a case).

Wiles and his fellow co-hosts speculated that because the court’s originalist faction is now overseeing a number of circuits where key battleground states are located, that likely will make it easier for the Trump campaign to get its legal challenges before the high court.

Describing the new circuit assignments as a “reshuffling,” Wiles noted the changes:

— Justice Samuel Alito will oversee the 3rd Circuit, which includes Pennsylvania

— Justice Clarence Thomas will oversee the 11th Circuit, which includes Georgia

— Justice Brett Kavanaugh was assigned the Sixth Circuit, which includes Michigan

— Justice Amy Coney Barrett is overseeing the Seventh Circuit, which includes Wisconsin

The Trump campaign has launched federal lawsuits or other legal challenges in each of these states, though several cases in lower courts have already been tossed out.

“Do you see a pattern?” Wiles said. “The contested states are now supervised by conservative justices on the Supreme Court. This is not a coincidence.”

“Two are Trump appointees,” co-host Matthew Skow added.

Wiles speculated that Trump campaign attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell would “go before Supreme Court justices and demand a hearing before the Supreme Court” on cases they are pushing on the president’s behalf.

He also suggested that the justices could issue stays to individual secretaries of state blocking them from certifying election results.

So it was Friday night when Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) referred to President-elect Biden in an interview with ABC News.

But Blackburn campaign spokesperson, Abigail Sigler, told the Tennessean that the senator didn’t mean it.

“She simply misspoke — it’s nothing more,” Sigler told the paper.
Right wing Christians are just the most honest people around.

you're s0 good at embarrassing yourself you should give him lessons.

GA Gov. Calls For “Audit” After Heroes Capture Shredder Truck Loading Election Materials

Brian Kemp is a full out fraud… he waited until the evidence had been disposed of to call for an audit?

Facebook Denies 'Science' - Blocks Danish Study Questioning Efficacy Of Masks

"Yesterday marked the publication of a long-delayed trial in Denmark which hopes to answer that very question. The 'Damask-19 trial' was conducted in the spring with over 6,000 participants, when the public were not being told to wear masks, but other public health measures were in place. Unlike other studies looking at masks, the Danmask study was a randomised controlled trial – making it the highest quality scientific evidence."

He continued:

"Around half of those in the trial received 50 disposable surgical face masks, which they were told to change after eight hours of use. After one month, the trial participants were tested using both PCR, antibody, and lateral flow tests and compared with the trial participants who did not wear a mask.

"In the end, there was no statistically significant difference between those who wore masks and those who did not when it came to being infected by Covid-19. 1.8 per cent of those wearing masks caught Covid, compared to 2.1 per cent of the control group. As a result, it seems that any effect masks have on preventing the spread of the disease in the community is small."

Wait, you previously said you didn't trust the New York Times and claimed they lied about Trump

And yet, you are posting information and stats, sourced from the New York Times.

Rasmussen poll: 20-30% of Democrats believe the election was stolen from Trump

Honest patriotic Democrats, amazing.

Sidney Powell: Some 'May Need Witness Protection' After Our Exposé

Powell said evidence of fraud will be released this coming week.

"This was very widespread, very deliberate, well-funded and everybody and their pet rock is trying to stop me from exposing it," the attorney said.

Quote:

Honest patriotic Democrats, amazing.

Not all are as thick or ignorant as those on this board, apparently.