192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
neptuneblue
 
  -1  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 10:18 pm
@FreedomEyeLove,
Ok, that's good... You sure about this?

Summary

Singapore has one of the toughest gun control laws in the world. According to the Arms Offences Act, unlawful possession or carrying of firearms is punishable with imprisonment and caning. Using or attempting to use arms when committing a scheduled offense is punishable with death. The death penalty may also apply to the offender’s accomplices present at the scene of the offense.

Any person proved to be in unlawful possession of more than two firearms will be presumed to be trafficking in arms until the contrary is proved. Trafficking in arms is punishable with either death or imprisonment for life and with caning.

Possessing any firearms or importing, exporting, manufacturing, repairing, or selling them, requires a license. Licensing officers have the authority to refuse to issue a license, or to suspend or cancel a license without giving any reason.

Introduction

Singapore has one of the toughest firearms control laws in the world, according to its former Minister for Law, Professor S. Jayakumar.[1] Jayakumar attributes the fact that Singapore has very few firearm offenses in a time when “we see rampant firearm offences as well as smuggling and trafficking in weapons in the region and elsewhere in the world” to the strict gun control laws, including a “mandatory death penalty for anyone who discharges a firearm in the course of committing a serious offence, even if no one is injured or killed.”[2]

Singapore’s primary statutes regulating firearms are the Arms Offences Act,[3] which relates to the unlawful possession of arms and ammunition and the carrying and using of arms, and the Arms and Explosives Act,[4] which regulates the manufacture, use, sale, storage, transport, importation, exportation and possession of arms, explosives and explosive precursors, and gives effect to the Convention on the Marking of Plastic Explosives for the Purpose of Detection.

Arms Offences Act

The Arms Offences Act, which was first enacted in 1973, states that the act shall have effect without prejudice to the provisions of the Arms and Explosives Act, or any other written law in force in Singapore relating to the unlawful possession of arms or ammunition.[5]

Definition of Arms

An “arm” is defined by the Arms Offences Act to mean “any firearm, air-gun, air-pistol, automatic gun, automatic pistol and any other kind of gun or pistol from which any shot, bullet or other missile can be discharged or noxious liquid, flame or fumes can be emitted, and any component part thereof and includes any bomb or grenade and any component part thereof.”[6]

Unlawful Possession of Arms and Ammunition

According to the Arms Offences Act, any person who is in unlawful possession of any arm or ammunition shall be guilty of an offense and shall on conviction be punished with imprisonment for a term of not less than five years and not more than ten years, and shall also be punished with caning with not less than six strokes.[7]

Any person who unlawfully carries any arm shall be punished with imprisonment for a term of five to fourteen years and with caning with not less than six strokes.[8]

Aggravated penalties apply if the offender of the above two provisions was previously convicted of a scheduled offense; such an offender is subject to imprisonment for a term of five to twenty years and caning with not less than six strokes.[9]

Committing any scheduled offense while armed is punishable with imprisonment for life and caning with not less than six strokes.[10]

Using or Attempting to Use Arms

Subject to certain exceptions,[11] any person who uses or attempts to use any arm shall be guilty of an offense and shall on conviction be punished with death.[12] A person who uses or attempts to use arms is presumed to have intended to cause physical injury to a person or property until the contrary is proved.[13]

A person convicted of using or attempting to use any arm while committing or attempting to commit any scheduled offense shall be punished with death, regardless of whether he intended to cause physical injury to any person or property.[14] Moreover, each of his accomplices present at the scene of the offense who may reasonably be presumed to have known that that person was carrying the arm shall be punished with death, unless such accomplice can prove that he took all reasonable steps to prevent use of the arm.[15]

Trafficking in Arms

Trafficking in arms is punishable with either death or imprisonment for life and with caning with not less than six strokes.[16] Any person proved to be in unlawful possession of more than two arms will be presumed to be trafficking in arms until the contrary is proved.[17] “Trafficking in arms” under the act means to import, manufacture or deal in arms in contravention of the provisions of the Arms and Explosives Act, or to lend, give, sell, hire or offer any arm to a person who is not licensed to possess such arm.[18]

Exemptions

The provisions on unlawful possession of arms or ammunition under the Arms Offences Act do not apply to the following exempted persons:

(a) a member of any visiting force lawfully present in Singapore or of the police force or of a volunteer force or local force constituted under any written law for the time being in force in Singapore, when the member is carrying any arm in, or in connection with, the performance of his duty;

(b) any person who carries an arm as part of his official or ceremonial dress on any official or ceremonial occasion;

(c) any person licensed or authorized to carry or possess an arm under or by virtue of any written law relating to arms for the time being in force in Singapore; or

(d) a member of any organization or association specially authorized by the Minister by notification in the Gazette, when the member is carrying any arm in, or in connection with, the performance of his duty.[19]

Arms and Explosives Act

The Arms and Explosives Act, originally enacted in 1913, stipulates licensing requirements for arms, explosives, and explosive precursors. The Act also regulates related offenses, such as knowingly concealing firearms imported without a license, knowingly purchasing firearms from an unlicensed person, and offenses involving unmarked plastic explosives.[20]

Definition of Arms

“Arms” is defined by the Arms and Explosive Act to include:

(a) firearms, air-guns, air-pistols, stun guns, electronic dart guns, automatic guns, automatic pistols, guns or any other kind of gun from which any shot, bullet or other missile can be discharged or noxious fumes or noxious substance can be emitted, and any component part of any such arms;

(b) bayonets, swords, daggers, spears and spearheads; and

(c) such weapon, accessory, or other article or thing, as the Minister may, by notification in the Gazette, specify to be arms for the purposes of this Act or any part thereof. [21]

The definition of “arms” in the Arms and Explosives Act differs from that in the Arms Offences Act in that it includes bayonets, swords, daggers, spears, spearheads and additional articles that the authorized minister may specify.

Licensing Requirements for Firearms

In Singapore, any person who possesses, imports, exports, manufactures, or deals in firearms without a license shall be guilty of an offense. The Police Licensing and Regulatory Department issues two types of licenses: long-term licenses valid for two years and short-term licenses valid for fourteen days.[22]

Under the Arms and Explosives Act, no person in Singapore may, without a license, have in his possession or under his control any firearms, or import, export, manufacture, or deal in them.[23] “Deal in” under the Act means repair, sell, keep, or expose for sale.[24] Exemptions from the operation of the Act include certain activities carried out by order of the government, members of military, and police in the course of their duty or employment, and the like.[25]

The Arms and Explosives Act allows the licensing officer to refuse to issue a license to an applicant if he determines that the applicant is not a fit and proper person to hold such a license or if issuing a license would be contrary to the public interest.[26]

Licenses issued under the Act are subject to conditions. First, without any reason being given, the licensing officer may suspend or cancel a license. Second, a license expires after such period as is prescribed. Third, the license is generally not transferable.[27]

Minister for Home Affairs to Prohibit Exportation by Notification

Under the Arms and Explosives Act, the Minister for Home Affairs may, by notification published in the Gazette, prohibit for a stated period the exportation of firearms from Singapore, either absolutely or to any specified country, territory, or place outside Singapore; permit their exportation or removal subject to such conditions, limitations, or restrictions as he considers necessary; or permit their removal from place to place within Singapore.[28]

Penalties

Any person who has in his possession or under his control the proscribed firearms is liable on conviction to a fine and imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years.[29] Caning may also be imposed if the offender is proved to have possession or control of the arms, explosives, poisonous or noxious gas, or noxious substance for the purpose of committing an offense punishable under the Penal Code.[30] Importing, exporting, manufacturing, or dealing in the proscribed firearms without a license are also subject to a fine and to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years.[31] Knowingly concealing firearms that were imported unlawfully or without a license is punishable by imprisonment for up to three years and a fine.[32]

https://www.loc.gov/law/help/firearms-control/singapore.php#:~:text=and%20Explosives%20Act-,Summary,offense%20is%20punishable%20with%20death.
FreedomEyeLove
 
  4  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 10:22 pm
@neptuneblue,
You don't know a ******* thing about singapore.

Have you been there? Because I have.

If you so much as whisper about race division bullshit (a communist staple of division) like BLM pushes, you will be arrested for sedition.

You and your ilk on this website show how mentally stunted you are every day.
neptuneblue
 
  0  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 10:25 pm
@FreedomEyeLove,
What cracks me up every single time about the whole discussion with Singapore is -- they are the most government regulated Country, which seems contrary to republican beliefs.

Now, either you're FOR the regulation, OR you're NOT.

Pick a side. And stick to it.
FreedomEyeLove
 
  2  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 10:29 pm
@neptuneblue,
Singapore is a country I admire very much.

Do I agree with everything they do?

No.

Is it a perfect world?

No.

One thing Singapore doesn't tolerate, is dumb ass communists like the kind that populate this website. Which makes it all the more hilarious that BillW used Singapore as an example completely, and utterly incorrectly.

You people prove what a joke you are on the daily here.
neptuneblue
 
  1  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 10:30 pm
@FreedomEyeLove,
You do know you don't HAVE to post here, right?
FreedomEyeLove
 
  3  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 10:40 pm
@neptuneblue,
Quote:
You do know you don't HAVE to post here, right?


Watching mentally handicapped people who don't even realize that they're retarded spout off as if they know what they're talking about ...that can be entertaining. Sometimes. In the same sort of a way as seeing a bad car accident, and not being able to look away.
neptuneblue
 
  1  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 10:48 pm
@FreedomEyeLove,
A learned population takes care of the less unfortunate.

That's why people don't make light of intellectual disabilities.

But since now you've proven you aren't capable of compassion or morality, I'll leave to to your own...
FreedomEyeLove
 
  2  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 11:12 pm
@neptuneblue,
Quote:
A learned population takes care of the less unfortunate.


If that were actually true, the democrats would follow through on their "socialist" promises of helping the poor. Instead they enrich themselves and enslave the poor.

Quote:
That's why people don't make light of intellectual disabilities.


I'm not going to apologize for one minute for thoroughly laughing at the abundance of very clear mental disability on display here. Folks who routinely make fools of themselves. And the reason why is simple, because they have no "compassion or morality" whatsoever. Moreover, they use the illusion of such piety as a cudgel with which to assault anyone who dares to have a different opinion then them.

coldjoint
 
  3  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 11:24 pm
@neptuneblue,
Quote:
A learned population takes care of the less unfortunate.

Did you read that? The LESS UNfortunate are being taken care of. They make the laws and regulations that will never affect them and convince gullible people they are helping them stamp out racism and saving the world at the same time. These people do not want racism gone. They manipulate people with it.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  0  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 11:28 pm
@FreedomEyeLove,
that post is false in its entirety. Poor people are not stupid, despite what republicans think. that's why they vote democratic.
FreedomEyeLove
 
  4  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 11:35 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Poor people are not stupid


Not all of them.

Quote:
that's why they vote democratic.


No.

Unfortunately many poor people aren't hardened assholes like me. They should be, because if they weren't so trusting, they likely wouldn't buy the snake oil that the democrats are selling.

Lots of poor people aren't stupid, that's not the problem. The problem, is that many of them are too kind. Bad people like the commie democrats take advantage of kind people and exploit them.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  3  
Wed 11 Nov, 2020 12:00 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:

that post is false in its entirety. Poor people are not stupid, despite what republicans think. that's why they vote democratic.

That is why their children are stuck in substandard schools in Democrat shitholes. The teacher's union is more important than the children. Guess which party they vote for?
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  3  
Wed 11 Nov, 2020 12:13 am
Quote:

USPS Whistleblower demands Washington Post retract story saying he recanted allegations of voter fraud

I said I did not believe a thing the WPoo said. This proves they are liars and have no credibility.
Quote:
My name is Richard Hopkins, I am the postal employee who came out and whistle blew on the Erie PA postal service,” he said in the video. “I am right at this very moment looking at a article written by Washington Post, says that I fabricated the allegations of ballot tampering – I’m here to say that I did not ‘recant’ my statement, that did not happen, that is not what happened and you will find out tomorrow.”

No one will listen to the WP unless they plan on trying to perpetuate obvious lies like this one. It is over for the media. They really are the enemy of the people.
https://saraacarter.com/usps-whistleblower-demands-washington-post-retract-story-saying-he
coldjoint
 
  3  
Wed 11 Nov, 2020 12:18 am
Quote:
Ex-CIA Chief Under Obama Urges Palace Coup Against Trump So He Doesn't "Declassify Everything"

Brennan is sweating bullets. I wonder why?
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ex-cia-chief-under-obama-urges-palace-coup-against-trump-so-he-doesnt-declassify
RABEL222
 
  -1  
Wed 11 Nov, 2020 01:01 am
@coldjoint,
Ant gonna happen. If he declassified all government all secrets he and 80% of his government would go to jail for the rest of their lives. Except those that is who were shot for giving secrets Russia and china.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  0  
Wed 11 Nov, 2020 01:06 am
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
I said I did not believe a thing the WPoo said. This proves they are liars and have no credibility.

Quote:
https://i.imgur.com/lK4z1EH.jpg


Investigators told the committee that Hopkins "did not explain why he signed a false affidavit", the committee wrote in a statement.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Wed 11 Nov, 2020 01:44 am
@neptuneblue,
neptuneblue wrote:
You can cry at any time,

Why would I cry? The Republicans are almost certain to hold the Senate. That means there is no chance that Mr. Biden can pack the courts with Constitution-hating judges. And it means there is no chance that Mr. Biden can push through new laws that violate the Second Amendment.

Since the Democrats are not going to retake the Senate while they hold the White House, this means there is a 100% chance that we will not see any new gun control for the next 8 years, and a 99% chance that we will not see any new gun control for the next 12 years.


neptuneblue wrote:
but Biden is still the President-Elect.

His presidency will be opposed and undermined relentlessly.

Hopefully the Republicans will boo him off the stage when he tries to give a State of the Union speech. Personally I'd like to see them sound off air horns during the speech.

After they retake the House in 2022 the Republicans will have the ability to prevent him from giving a State of the Union speech altogether.


neptuneblue wrote:
We have yet to see any policy regarding the 2A.

That is incorrect. Mr. Biden has a long history of attacking the Second Amendment, and he openly campaigned in 2020 on a platform of grievously violating people's civil liberties for no reason.

Because of the Republican Senate he will not be able to do what he wishes, but there is no question that Mr. Biden would be happy to hurt people if he could.


neptuneblue wrote:
Yet you still have poor judgement in foreseeing the future.

Wrong again. My judgement is pretty good, and is quite a bit better than yours.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  -1  
Wed 11 Nov, 2020 01:45 am
@coldjoint,
Quote:

Brennan is sweating bullets. I wonder why?
Because, in the short 4 years of the Trump regime, weve gone from a Democratic Republic to a DICTATORSHIP.

When , I wonder, will el duce start wearing a white uniform with all his medals ?
oralloy
 
  1  
Wed 11 Nov, 2020 01:48 am
@farmerman,
Come on now. We are not a dictatorship.
farmerman
 
  -1  
Wed 11 Nov, 2020 01:56 am
@oralloy,
Trump is taking us there. Liten to Pompeo and all Trump's Senate lackies except for 4 GOPers.

I know all you will o is try to impugn those 4.

Hes a sore loser ,(Trump that is)


BTW, where is el Duce, has he already left on the Mother Ship?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.46 seconds on 07/24/2025 at 04:41:30