192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 11:47 am
@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:

oralloy wrote:

Packing the courts means expanding the number of judges on the court and filling the new seats yourself.

The Federalist Society merely supports judges who uphold the law and the Constitution.


That's only one definition....packing the courts also means rapidly filling federal vacancies that went intentionally unfilled during the Obama administration so they can place the most conservative leaning judges during the Trump administration.

The Federalist Society's goal is to prevent any moderate individual serving on any Federal Court to reinforce their own political agenda for the purpose of controlling women's ability to make their own health issues, ignore the benefits of diversity and to marginalize the LBGTQ groups and deprive them of their civil rights for fun.

All you are saying is the way our system works will not give the Democrats what they want if the follow the rules. So Democrats will change the rules if they can. Bitching about not being able to function within Constitutional guidelines should be ignored.
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  2  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 11:51 am
Would one of the smarter people on this board please tell me what CJ is trying to say. Right now, I suspect he's trying to gossip.
hightor
 
  1  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 11:58 am
@glitterbag,
Quote:
Would one of the smarter people on this board please tell me what CJ is trying to say.


I think you'd have better luck by asking some of the dumber people.
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 11:58 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
coldjoint wrote:
We call it fraud on this side of the pond.

But how can hundred thousands of dead people register for an election?

Didn't he just answer that in the post that you are replying to?
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 12:04 pm
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 12:06 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
They were probably registered before they died. Voter rolls should be cleaned up but seldom are leaving the possibility for the kind of fraud that took place. Someone simply votes for the dead person as his or her name still appears on the list of registered voters.
Not too sound more stupid tha you and others think that I am, but since we here are registered (and de-registered) automatically, I was just wondering.
Thanks.
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  3  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 12:07 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:

Quote:
Would one of the smarter people on this board please tell me what CJ is trying to say.


I think you'd have better luck by asking some of the dumber people.


I take your point.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 12:07 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:

Quote:
Would one of the smarter people on this board please tell me what CJ is trying to say.


I think you'd have better luck by asking some of the dumber people.

Then why aren't you answering her?
hightor
 
  3  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 12:13 pm
@coldjoint,
I did, but she specifically asked for one of the smarter people so I just offered a suggestion.
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 12:33 pm
@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:
That's only one definition

It's the real definition.


glitterbag wrote:
....packing the courts also means rapidly filling federal vacancies that went intentionally unfilled during the Obama administration so they can place the most conservative leaning judges during the Trump administration.

That's a phony definition. Like when progressives pretend that the term assault rifle refers to ordinary hunting rifles.

Progressives like to make up phony definitions for words.


glitterbag wrote:
The Federalist Society's goal is to prevent any moderate individual serving on any Federal Court to reinforce their own political agenda for the purpose of controlling women's ability to make their own health issues, ignore the benefits of diversity and to marginalize the LBGTQ groups and deprive them of their civil rights for fun.

Your use of the term "moderate" to refer to judges who disregard the law and the Constitution is stretching the term a bit much.

The purpose of sidelining such judges is merely because the Federalist society loves our Constitution and thinks that it should be adhered to.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 12:34 pm
@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:
That's not true, Doctors don't have to accept Medicare or Medicaid.

So what happens if I come across a doctor that refuses Medicare (let's say I'm unconscious in an emergency room)?

Do they pass me off to a different doctor, or do they surprise me with a bill after they treat me?

I'm aware that some doctors charge more than Medicare pays. That's where having the proper type of Medigap policy comes into play.
BillW
 
  2  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 12:40 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:

I did, but she specifically asked for one of the smarter people so I just offered a suggestion.

....and,cj dutifully volunteered.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 12:47 pm
@BillW,
Quote:
....and,cj dutifully volunteered.

Ah, it must be gossip time.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 01:05 pm


0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 01:10 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
I don't know if any of you have checked out this important story, but u/Builder, who posted it this morning, is right up on this stuff and, well frankly, it looks bad for Biden.

Seems to be a lot of this stuff floating around in the spinning-eyed-lunatic universe

coldjoint
 
  0  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 01:10 pm
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 01:12 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Quote:
I don't know if any of you have checked out this important story, but u/Builder, who posted it this morning, is right up on this stuff and, well frankly, it looks bad for Biden.

Seems to be a lot of this stuff floating around in the spinning-eyed-lunatic universe



The NYT is not a credible source, much like the person who posted the link. Both are proven liars.
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  2  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 01:24 pm

enjoy Colbert...

0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 01:26 pm
Remember when a senator asked Kavanaugh why he did not ask the FBI to investigate him? Why would the media and Democrats object to a thorough examination of the election? They should be pushing the investigation to prove they won fairly.

Right?
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  2  
Tue 10 Nov, 2020 01:40 pm
Pompeo just said there is “going to be a smooth transition to the second Trump term”.

These guys are going to try to install their own electors for a “recount” of the electoral college.

Just crooked and shameless.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/11/10/biden-trump-in-transition-standoff-live-news
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.86 seconds on 07/21/2025 at 05:58:33