192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
justaguy2
 
  1  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 09:56 am
@bobsal u1553115,
Good luck with that. You'd have more luck convincing them to vote for biden...
oralloy
 
  -3  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 09:58 am
@justaguy2,
You sure are dishonorable.

We are not the ones who are breaking the rules.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 10:03 am
@justaguy2,
I know. But you never know, they might come into the light one of these days.

Aw .... who am I kidding, they thrive in the dark.
RABEL222
 
  3  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 10:05 am
@MontereyJack,
Have you noticed when you score a point on Ollie he posts 5 or 6 BS posts in a row?
oralloy
 
  -3  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 10:07 am
@RABEL222,
Don't be so dishonest. You cannot point out an untrue statement in any of my posts.

You also cannot provide any examples of you or he ever scoring a point.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 10:09 am
@bobsal u1553115,
Your lack of honor and integrity is shameful. You are the one who is breaking the rules here.
RABEL222
 
  2  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 10:15 am
@oralloy,
In your "MIND?" any opinion you post is fact no matter how wrong it is so no one can show you a wrong post by you because you are unable to recognize anything you post as wrong. I hope that explanation docent confuse you.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 10:18 am
@RABEL222,
I've never treated my opinions as facts, and you cannot provide any examples of me ever having done such a thing.

Opinions are neither right nor wrong, by the way, as they are opinions.

The reason why you cannot point out any untrue statements in my posts is because there are no such statements to be found in my posts.

Don't worry. I have a natural immunity to confusion.
0 Replies
 
justaguy2
 
  0  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 10:23 am
@bobsal u1553115,
Yeah, it's boring being a realist, isn't it?

The sad fact is that it's much easier to be completely delusional, because it doesn't require any logical thought process. But that's nutcases like oralloy/yellow cake for ya. It's even sadder that yellow cake thinks I'm going to reply to them, not to mention proves how delusional they are given that I've not replied to them since I put them on ignore some time ago now...
oralloy
 
  -2  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 10:29 am
@justaguy2,
There is noting even remotely real about either your lies or bobsal's lies. Your continued dishonesty only proves your lack of integrity.

No delusions on my end. You cannot point out untrue statements in any of my posts.

You lack the intelligence to draw conclusions about what other people think.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 10:45 am
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Your sources and cites are not fact-based.

This is not fact?
https://www.worldtribune.com/blm-mob-swarms-la-hospital-where-ambushed-deputies-were-taken-we-hope-the-btch-dies/
You are saying those cops were not shot?

Once again, your reply starts with a lie and the rest says your usual nothing.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 10:48 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:


Alexander Vindman: Trump Is Putin’s ‘Useful Idiot’


In his first interview, a key witness in the impeachment trial says Trump goes out of his way to try to please the Russian president.

Quote:
1. On whether Trump is a Russian-intelligence asset:

“President Trump should be considered to be a useful idiot … an unwitting agent of Putin.”

2. On whether Russia is blackmailing Trump:

“They may or may not have dirt on him, but they don’t have to use it.”

Vindman continues:

“In the Army, we call this ‘free chicken,’ something you don’t have to work for—it just comes to you. This is what the Russians have in Trump: free chicken.”

3. On the end of his Army career:

It was “destroyed” by the president, he says. “I’m not crying over spilled milk. I have other things to do.”

the atlantic/goldberg




Vindman does not and will never make policy. He says what the Left wants to hear. That is all it is and will not cost Trump one vote. The people that believe the weasel have already made up there minds.

Plus the Atlantic is not a credible source.

coldjoint
 
  -3  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 11:27 am
Quote:
235 retired military leaders publicly endorse Trump in open letter – here it is

Quote:
The 2020 election affords the American people an urgently needed opportunity to affirm their devotion to the Constitution of the United States and to the American way of life. As senior leaders of America’s military, we took an oath to defend the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic. At present, our country is now confronted with enemies here and abroad, as well as a once in a century pandemic. As retired military officers, we believe that Donald J. Trump has been tested as few other presidents have and is the proven leader to confront these dangers.

It can be argued that this is the most important election since our country was founded. With the Democratic Party welcoming to socialists and Marxists, our historic way of life is at stake.

During the Obama/Biden administration, America’s armed forces were subjected to a series of ill-considered and debilitating budget cuts. The Democrats have once again pledged to cut defense spending, undermining our military strength.

The Democrats’ opposition to border security, their pledge to return to the disastrous Iran nuclear deal, their antagonism towards the police and planned cuts to military spending will leave the United States more vulnerable to foreign enemies.

President Trump’s resolute stands have deterred our enemies from aggression against us and our allies. The proposed defense cuts by the Democrats will, in our professional judgment, create a potentially perilous situation for the United States during a time of great external and internal threats to our Nation.

For these reasons, we support Donald Trump’s re-election. We believe that President Donald Trump is committed to a strong America. As president, he will continue to secure our borders, defeat our adversaries, and restore law and order domestically.

We urge our fellow Americans to join us in supporting the re-election of Donald Trump for President.

The names are at the link, all of them.
https://americanmilitarynews.com/2020/09/235-retired-military-leaders-publicly-endorse-trump-in-open-letter-here-it-is/





bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 11:32 am
@justaguy2,
It works. Ignore them.
coldjoint
 
  2  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 11:45 am
@bobsal u1553115,
bobsal u1553115 wrote:

It works. Ignore them.

Nothing you do works, and talking to yourself won't change that.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 12:22 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Plus the Atlantic is not a credible source.

It's preposterous that you, of all people, would accuse The Atlantic and Jeffrey Goldberg as not credible. What parts of the interview do you think were made up? What statements do you think Goldberg twisted to conform to a liberal agenda? What do you think Vindman really said — that Trump was not guilty of an impeachable offense?

Now, how about those Bakersfield doctors?
hightor
 
  3  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 12:31 pm
@coldjoint,
235 retired military leaders wrote:
For these reasons, we support Donald Trump’s re-election. We believe that President Donald Trump is committed to a strong America. As president, he will continue to secure our borders, defeat our adversaries, and restore law and order domestically,” the letter says. “We urge our fellow Americans to join us in supporting the re-election of Donald Trump for President.”

What adversaries has Trump "defeated"? Not Kim Jung Un, that's for sure. Not Putin, ha ha. Iran is still a threat in the Mideast as is ISIS. And do you remember all the crying about the five Taliban prisoners we exchanged for Bergdahl? Trump's "peace" deal in Afghanistan has resulted in thousands of hardened, militant Taliban fighters being released from prison. I've got news for the 235 retired military leaders — turning tail and running away isn't "defeating our adversaries".
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 12:43 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:

Quote:
Plus the Atlantic is not a credible source.

It's preposterous that you, of all people, would accuse The Atlantic and Jeffrey Goldberg as not credible. What parts of the interview do you think were made up? What statements do you think Goldberg twisted to conform to a liberal agenda? What do you think Vindman really said — that Trump was not guilty of an impeachable offense?

Now, how about those Bakersfield doctors?

F*ck Vindman, and the Atlantic. Those doctors were censored for disagreeing with the WHO. An organization that caused more deaths from its unreliable and untrue information. Scott Atlas is now being censored for disagreeing with that the China owned WHO.

I have no idea of the point you are trying to make, do you?
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 12:48 pm
Quote:
The Adverse Effects of Obama’s Executive Order 13583 and the Purge of Generals and Admirals Are Now Obvious

Quote:
The results from these actions are now crystal clear. Retired Obama-era flag and general officers (FOGO), in direct violation of Article 88 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, have publicly criticized President Trump and even called him a threat to US national security, as noted here and here. Several may even be preparing for a military coup, as reported in this shocking video from Col Richard H. Black, JAG Corps, USA (retd), a former head of the Army’s Criminal Law Division:

Obama hates America, and always has.
Quote:
It began to be clear last October that the Obama administration (with some help from Bill Clinton’s presidency) had seeded the Pentagon with leftist generals whose allegiance was to the Deep State, to cultural leftism, and to the infamous and profitable “military industrial complex” that Eisenhower warned about in 1961. In only five years, Obama had conducted a major Pentagon purge, firing almost 200 senior officers who held the old-fashioned belief that the military exists to protect America and should not be a social justice institution with limited firepower.

The upper-level officers who remained were hardcore Democrats. While still in the military, Admiral McRaven gave bin Laden a respectful, private burial. Once out of the military, he wrote an editorial for the New York Times, strongly suggesting a military coup against Trump. Barry McCaffrey, a Clinton White House officer, likened Trump to Mussolini because he canceled the White House’s newspaper subscriptions. And Obama’s Joint Chiefs Vice Chair, James Winnefeld, was deeply offended on behalf of ISIS terrorist Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi because Trump did the psychologically smart thing of telling al-Baghdadi’s followers that he died like a coward.

https://www.redstate.com/stu-in-sd/2020/09/15/the-adverse-effects-of-obama%e2%80%99s-eo-13583-and-fogo-purge-are-now-obvious/
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Tue 15 Sep, 2020 12:50 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
turning tail and running away isn't "defeating our adversaries".

It does not do much for the MIC either. That is why their panties are in a bunch. Laughing
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.45 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 07:20:53