192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Mon 24 Aug, 2020 02:45 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
Russian government-supported organizations are playing a small but increasing role amplifying conspiracy theories promoted by QAnon, raising concerns of interference in the November U.S. election.

And next it says...
Quote:
Academics who study QAnon said there were no signs Russia had a hand in the early days of the movement, which launched in 2017 with anonymous web postings amplified by YouTube videos.

Who made them the experts, they are hopelessly biased.
Quote:
Alethea Group disinformation expert Cindy Otis, a former CIA analyst, said RT, Sputnik and other Kremlin-backed media have been writing more about QAnon, using it to fit into their broader narrative of: “The U.S. is falling apart, look how much division there is.”

That is the Democratic message to promote the division. Why can't Russia say it too?
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -2  
Mon 24 Aug, 2020 06:29 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Researchers at Graphika, Stanford University and elsewhere stressed that QAnon for now remains a largely domestic phenomenon. Facebook took down two QAnon networks for coordinated artificial behavior, before its new content restrictions, and neither had Russian connections.


The fact that anyone is still spruiking a Russian connection to current circumstances indicates that they've not nothing to add to the conversation.

Much like the DNC has nothing to add to an election campaign, by thinking Creepy Joe is viable. He's barely capable of remembering what he is doing.

coldjoint
 
  -4  
Mon 24 Aug, 2020 07:03 pm
@Builder,
Quote:
The fact that anyone is still spruiking a Russian connection to current circumstances indicates that they've not nothing to add to the conversation.

It has to be frustrating to repeat a lie that has been proven to be a lie. The number of people who still believe the Russian crap only show these people would not know the truth if it bit them and regard facts as inconveniences.
RABEL222
 
  3  
Mon 24 Aug, 2020 10:26 pm
@coldjoint,
you are one of the 35 percent. A very stupid trumpie.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Mon 24 Aug, 2020 10:46 pm
@coldjoint,
what do you not understand about "amplifying"? QAnon promulgates it, the Russians incorporate that into their disinformation and using their resources, spread it around widely in an attempt to make it sound rational and widely talked about. That's amplifying.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Mon 24 Aug, 2020 10:49 pm
@coldjoint,
nutballs are everywhere.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Mon 24 Aug, 2020 10:50 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
what do you not understand about "amplifying"?

The media amplifies what it wants. Deal with it. They deserve to be heard.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Mon 24 Aug, 2020 10:52 pm
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:

you are one of the 35 percent. A very stupid trumpie.

You really should not call people stupid. Your posts make that pretty clear.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Mon 24 Aug, 2020 10:57 pm
@coldjoint,
Yeah, we know you really love a good conspiracy theory, the crazier it is, the better.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Mon 24 Aug, 2020 10:58 pm
@coldjoint,
rabel
s posts make it perfectly clear when he call something stupid he's probably right.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Mon 24 Aug, 2020 11:12 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Yeah, we know you really love a good conspiracy theory, the crazier it is, the better.

Like the Russian hoax?
Builder
 
  -3  
Tue 25 Aug, 2020 03:58 am
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Like the Russian hoax?


I like the one where a former vice president runs for office, but needs help tying his own shoelaces.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Tue 25 Aug, 2020 04:12 am
@coldjoint,
Quote:
The number of people who still believe the Russian crap only show these people would not know the truth if it bit them and regard facts as inconveniences.

It's more like this:
"The number of people who still refuse to believe the Russian crap only show these people would not know the truth if it bit them and regard facts as inconveniences."

Did you even hear about THIS? (I know you didn't read it but I thought that maybe you might have gotten wind of it.) Do you know that Paul Manafort shared campaign polling data with a Russian agent?

Senate Committee Report on Russian Interference wrote:
On numerous occasions over the course of his time of the Trump Campaign, Manafort sought to secretly share internal campaign information with Kilimnik. … Manafort briefed Kilimnik on sensitive campaign polling data and the campaign’s strategy for beating Hillary Clinton.

MAGAtards are too busy sharing scurrilous lies about Biden and Harris to even own up to the misdeeds done on the president's behalf...and by Trump himself. Meanwhile millions of USAmericans are facing poverty and eviction.

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.GRcmoSKDFi40Ch2YE-w7-wHaFj%26pid%3DApi&f=1

MontereyJack
 
  2  
Tue 25 Aug, 2020 04:18 am
@coldjoint,
exactly. That the well-documented Russian interference was a hoax is a conspiracy theory of the first magnitude. Once again you prove my point..
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -4  
Tue 25 Aug, 2020 04:20 am
@hightor,
Let's look at why Clinton lost so much of her early lead in the build-up to election day, shall we, Hi? Money talks, and bullshit walks.

Source

The kingdom of Saudi Arabia donated more than $10 million. Through a foundation, so did the son-in-law of a former Ukrainian president whose government was widely criticized for corruption and the murder of journalists. A Lebanese-Nigerian developer with vast business interests contributed as much as $5 million.

For years the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation thrived largely on the generosity of foreign donors and individuals who gave hundreds of millions of dollars to the global charity. But now, as Mrs. Clinton seeks the White House, the funding of the sprawling philanthropy has become an Achilles’ heel for her campaign and, if she is victorious, potentially her administration as well.

With Mrs. Clinton facing accusations of favoritism toward Clinton Foundation donors during her time as secretary of state, former President Bill Clinton told foundation employees on Thursday that the organization would no longer accept foreign or corporate donations should Mrs. Clinton win in November.

But while the move could avoid the awkwardness of Mr. Clinton jetting around the world asking for money while his wife is president, it did not resolve a more pressing question: how her administration would handle longtime donors seeking help from the United States, or whose interests might conflict with the country’s own.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -3  
Tue 25 Aug, 2020 04:53 am
So you can bang on all you like about Russia, but Clinton lost the election through her own fault.

I bet she didn't admit to that, in her long-winded "How it Happened" cash-in on her historic and surprising loss.

Much like yourself, Hi. she's still in denial. And looking for scapegoats.

Reality is much different to your vision.
hightor
 
  5  
Tue 25 Aug, 2020 05:23 am
@Builder,
Quote:
So you can bang on all you like about Russia, but Clinton lost the election through her own fault.

You can say that about any losing candidate.

While many USAmericans were suspicious of the Clinton Foundation, Clinton's lead in the polls really began dropping after the Russians hacked the DNC and gave the information to WikiLeaks, to be released piece-by-piece in response to developments in the campaign. Trump was aware of this and encouraged it. Clinton's candidacy didn't inspire Democrats across the board; this has been a recurring problem for the Democratic Party. Even when it has control of Congress and the White House, the "big tent" coalition is always in danger of unraveling — it's impossible for any faction to get everything it demands. The qualities of Mrs. Clinton that inspired some Democrats were not that appealing to others in the coalition who subsequently sat out the election.

Below viewing threshold (view)
hightor
 
  5  
Tue 25 Aug, 2020 06:10 am
@Builder,
Quote:
Why do you keep pretending this didn't happen?


Because of stories like this one:

Quote:
Around March and April 2016, the Russian intelligence officers also targeted the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC).

The hackers apparently first got access to the DCCC network and, using information gathered from that hack, later got access to the DNC network.

According to the indictment, they connected to both groups’ networks to install malware on their computers. This malware, X-Agent, is a computer program that tracks a user’s activity by logging the keystrokes of everything typed on these devices, as well as taking screenshots.

They harvested everything, including email passwords, opposition research, staff communication, personal banking information of staffers, and a folder about the Benghazi investigation.

Then they tried to cover their tracks while they sent the information from the DCCC and DNC back to the servers leased by the GRU, Russia’s intelligence agency.

source
bobsal u1553115
 
  5  
Tue 25 Aug, 2020 09:21 am
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/71/95/fb/7195fb267ec73da600bc1a09571794e3.jpg
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.49 seconds on 07/17/2025 at 02:53:19