@Builder,
Quote:
Many times I've asked how an entrepreneur, with zero government experience, could even qualify for the role of Commander-in-Chief of the US of A...
It's not that complicated. You've made this observation many times before, but it's perfectly comprehensible.
This is a post of yours from Sunday:
Quote:Donald wasn't "qualified" for any kind of national management role, but under US law, he had everything that it takes.
To which my response was:
Quote:Remember though, that when those qualifications were written in 1787, voting was restricted to property-owning white males, and the president was chosen by Electors, not the popular vote, as a further defense against demagoguery. Of course the joke is that as early as 1800, Aaron Burr made it obvious that pretty much any rich, ambitious white man seeking power could run for the job.
Basically there are no job-related qualifications, you only need to be popular and have access to cash.
And, to clear up any confusion, the post I addressed to you about Q-Anon and Russia should have been "reply to all". It has nothing to do with you.