monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

A paid escort is an actual whore.
It fits. A whoremonger married a whore.

Do you have to quote that creature? I have it on ignore for a reason.

Coldjoint et al try to use this to smear Harris as a “hoe”.

Quote:

Coldjoint et al try to use this to smear Harris as a “hoe”.

She smeared herself. She was quite public about her relationship with a married man. Google it. Fact. And Snopes is a liberal apologist think tank.

coldjoint wrote:

Quote:

Coldjoint et al try to use this to smear Harris as a “hoe”.

She smeared herself. She was quite public about her relationship with a married man. Google it. Fact. And Snopes is a liberal apologist think tank.

Name one thing in the Snopes piece that’s not true.
You are one lost mofo, and I feel sorry for anyone on whom your nutbag words and ideas have any influence.

My brother lay dying yesterday but I didn't give a **** and went golfing.

Andrew Yang Says Democrats Are ‘In Danger’ Of Being Perceived As Party Of ‘Elite’

“I think the Democrats need to do some soul-searching and say, ‘Why is it, why is it that so many people think the Democratic Party isn’t speaking to them, isn’t fighting for them, is patronizing them?'”

but you are oblivious to any words but your own as you prove in post after post.

The United States suffered an embarrassing diplomatic defeat on Friday when the United Nations Security Council rejected a proposal to indefinitely extend an arms embargo on Iran, with even America’s strongest allies refusing to buckle under pressure from the Trump administration to take a harder line.

The defeat underscored America’s deepening global isolation on the issue of Iran. But for the Trump administration, the vote could open a separate path to try to inflict maximum damage on Iran ahead of November’s U.S. presidential election.

For months, Trump administration officials have warned that if the vote to extend the embargo failed, the United States would try to invoke a provision built into the Obama-era nuclear accord to punish any Iranian violations by reimposing all sanctions lifted when the deal took effect. That could include the prohibition of not just arms deals, but also oil sales and banking agreements. In theory, all U.N. members would have to adhere to the sanctions.

The provision, known as a snapback, would be devastating for Iran, which is already struggling with a moribund economy made worse by the coronavirus. Pursuing the snapback would also put the Trump administration at odds with America’s allies, which vehemently oppose it as legally dubious and potentially destabilizing to the region.

. . .

Moreover, critics of the United States position question whether the Trump administration, having withdrawn from the nuclear accord, has legal standing in any debate over its provisions — including the arms embargo and snapback. Having failed to live up to its end of the agreement, these critics say, the Trump administration cannot insist on having a say over whether Iran is remaining faithful to the deal.

. . .

n defending its pursuit of the embargo, Trump administration officials have argued that Iran has been violating the arms restrictions laid out in the 2015 nuclear agreement.

. . .

In a lengthy essay published this week on the website Medium, Mr. Zarif wrote that the international community faced an important decision: “Do we maintain respect for the rule of law, or do we return to the law of the jungle?”

. . .

Judging from the statements of Mr. Pompeo and Ms. Craft, the United States has little patience for continued debate over the embargo. Rather, Friday’s vote could be seen more as a diplomatic formality the Trump administration felt it had to undertake as part of a broader effort to achieve its ultimate goal: killing the nuclear deal once and for all.

“The objective is to bury the deal and pressure the Iranians,” said Robert Malley, president of International Crisis Group and a former coordinator for the Middle East and Persian Gulf region in the Obama administration.

Mail-only v. Absentee Ballots: One of These Is Not Like the Other

Liberals and their Democrat partners claim these reasonable protections are “racist” and barriers to voting for low income voters who “do not have access” to photo ID. They favor mailing ballot applications to every voting address on record without requests or confirming the voting status of recipients.

The Trump administration itself has violated the Iran nuclear accord,

BLM says looting, riots are reparations — it’s all good then

A Black Lives Matter Chicago crew held a rally on Monday night in support of more than 100 people arrested after widespread looting and rioting in the city the night prior.

Organizers said the suspected looters, who were reportedly involved in causing at least $60 million in property damage and left 13 police officers injured, deserve the right to do so. It’s “reparations,” NBC Chicago reported.

“I don’t care if someone decides to loot a Gucci or a Macy’s or a Nike store, because that makes sure that person eats,” Ariel Atkins, a BLM organizer, said. “That makes sure that person has clothes.”

“That is reparations,” Atkins added. “Anything they wanted to take, they can take it because these businesses have insurance.”

Hundreds of people swarmed downtown Chicago early Monday, breaking the windows of dozens of businesses and stealing anything they could including merchandise and cash machines.