@bobsal u1553115,
You mean like in France where if no candidate gets more than 50% of the vote the top two candidates go on a run off?
That’s when the Socialists had to vote for Chirac against Le Pen.
I’m speaking as an outsider here and don’t claim any real authority on the subject but I get the feeling that there’s a strong resistance to change, as if it would betray the founding fathers and America in some way.
It’s not just run off elections, it’s the electoral college and the super majority needed in the Senate to effect real change. And I’m sure there’s other things as well.
We had a similar thing over here long ago. Pitt the younger tried some very modest reforms, but had to back down in the face of conservative opposition. It wasn’t until 1832 that any real change happened. We’re talking about an electoral map drawn up centuries earlier, before the industrial revolution. Major cities like Liverpool and Manchester had no representatives, and some MPs represented places that no longer existed. That’s just a bit of it.
At the time there was huge concern that messing about with something set down centuries earlier that had functioned well enough would cause disaster.
Obviously it’s not the same as what’s going on in America right now, I just see a few parallels that’s all.