192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
oralloy
 
  -4  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 06:27 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
Actually it doesnt.

Sure it does. Mr. Trump prevents progressives from violating our civil liberties.


farmerman wrote:
And you are worried about "progressives".

Progressives are the ones who are out to violate our civil liberties.


farmerman wrote:
You know what Bugs Bunny would call you?

A civil liberties advocate.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 06:27 am
@farmerman,
At the risk of getting flack, Nixon was a good President and a very lousy human being. If he hadn't have had serious personality flaws he be highly rated. He even worked for universal healthcare with Teddy ******* Kennedy. How bipartisan was that? The voting act, introduction of ERA amendment, and a bunch more that escape me without coffee.

In a lot of ways he continued Johnson's "Great Society" work.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 06:29 am
@justaguy2,
justaguy2 wrote:
That's because oralloy/yellow cake simply doesn't have any logical counter argument, and they know it.

Counter argument to what? All you offer is childish name-calling.


justaguy2 wrote:
The ironic thing there is that they are always reminding us how "smart" they think they are,

That's doubly untrue. I know how smart I am. And I only address the subject to set the record straight when you lie about me.


justaguy2 wrote:
but unfortunately for them, their posts tell a very different story,

Actually your inability to point out any errors in my posts is pretty solid evidence that I am vastly smarter than you are.


justaguy2 wrote:
then they have to resort to diversion tactics instead - so much for their so-called "high IQ".

Another lie. I always address points head on.


justaguy2 wrote:
At least coldjoint/pinky doesn't pretend to have a clue what their on about

Another lie. He understands what he is talking about perfectly well.

Not to be redundant, but you are the only person here who is incapable of producing an intelligent argument.


justaguy2 wrote:
And unlike oralloy/yellow cake, they can even admit it when they clearly haven't understood what they've read to begin with... well at least what other posters here have said anyway...

Another lie. I would admit it if I didn't understand something.


justaguy2 wrote:
It's classic diversion tactics; can't find any logical argument,

I make logical arguments all the time. You don't see them because the logical arguments get directed at people who engage in intelligent conversation.


justaguy2 wrote:
turn the focus to the other person's "posting style"

If you don't want to be criticized for spouting childish name-calling, don't spout childish name-calling.

Of course, that would leave you with nothing to say. But at least no one would be condemning you for childish name-calling.


justaguy2 wrote:
even though I also provided reason and context as to why I said what I said - it's right out of trump's playbook. As their idol trump would say... Sad!

Your only reason for spouting childish name-calling is because you lack the intelligence to say anything else.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -2  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 06:34 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
I dont think Trump can even read and omprehend, Hes like a Golden Retriever with ADD


So tell me again how a playboy entrepreneur with zero govt experience gets to qualify for the role of commander in chief of an intercontinental armament.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 06:48 am
@Builder,
By the poison pill electoral college. Certainly not by our vote, which he lost. And by appealing for Russian aid, which putin supplied profusely. And by a shitload of terminally gullible republican voters. Next question.
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  1  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 06:57 am
@justaguy2,

okay, i'll bite...

what does yellow cake mean?
Frank Apisa
 
  3  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 07:02 am
@Region Philbis,
AMEN!

I doubt he has the character to resign, but hope springs eternal.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  4  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 07:05 am
@Builder,
Quote:

So tell me again how a playboy entrepreneur with zero govt experience gets to qualify for the role of commander in chief of an intercontinental armament.

He was never "qualified" for that role. He met the minimal requirement to run for the office as stated in the obsolete U.S. Constitution. His notoriety was enough to make him stand out from the crowd of boring alternatives, and as M.J. points out, he had help from Putin and the electoral college.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 07:10 am
@Region Philbis,
Quote:
what does yellow cake mean?

"Yellow cake" is a type of uranium ore. "Oralloy" is a form of enriched uranium.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 07:10 am
@Region Philbis,
Region Philbis wrote:
what does yellow cake mean?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowcake
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 07:11 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
"Oralloy" is a form of enriched uranium.

Oralloy means weapons grade.

In World War Two, the code for weapons grade uranium was Oak Ridge Alloy, or oralloy for short.

The idea was if Nazi spies got wind of some sort of special metal being worked on at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, the Germans would think it was just some sort of advanced alloy, and wouldn't realize that it was part of an A-bomb project.

After the war the name stuck, and it is still used to refer to weapons grade uranium.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 07:21 am
@Region Philbis,
Its what uranium comes from. oralloy is a metal used in nuclear reactors.

Could the boy be atomwaffen???
Region Philbis
 
  1  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 07:32 am

wasn't sure if "yellow cake" with a space meant something else.

thanx all...
farmerman
 
  3  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 07:33 am
@bobsal u1553115,
oralloy is just a Manhattan Project compound acronym name , "Oak Ridge alloy". Its a pet name for enriched U. Its used a bit today, (like on A2K) .
farmerman
 
  2  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 07:34 am
@Region Philbis,
yellow cake is three steps below enriched U.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 08:02 am
@farmerman,
always knew he was radioactive.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 09:41 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
CLUELESS DON, or is he? I wonder if hes dabbled into investing in market fisheries for the Trump family.
My guess would be that the motivations and processes involved in this and other such policy moves are varied.

No matter how many resources might be invested in uncovering the corruption of this family, I'm sure we'll never find out the full picture. But definitely that's one factor in this guy's tenure.

Add to that his obvious motivation to wreak vengeance on Obama through overturning key Obama initiatives (knowing what we now know about Trump's psyche, it's pretty clear that Obama publicly treating Trump like a clown at the 2011 Correspondents Dinner left a gaping wound).

But I think the greater part of Trump's moves to deregulate come not from any ideological stance (he's too uniformed and uninterested other than as it effects his bank account) but rather from the conservative universe he is now enveloped by (politicians, Federalist Society figures, Fox and conservative-linked K Street lobbyists, etc).

0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 12:34 pm
Quote:
Democrats Can Kiss Their Riot Cycle Strategy Goodbye

Quote:

“It’s Trump’s Fault My City Is Burning So Please Don’t Vote for Him”

It became especially clear in places like New York City that Governor Andrew Cuomo and Mayor Bill DeBlasio were not feeling any urgency to restore civic order. Cuomo steadfastly refused to send in the National Guard, while DeBlasio pulled the NYPD back and ordered it to stand down. Both men then spent days blaming President Trump for the increased rioting and destruction that occurred.

So when the question is asked, why do these elected officials in deep blue states insist on giving vandals, anarchists and looters space to destroy these cities? Prepare yourselves for a shock:

It’s all about President Donald J. Trump.

It’s all about the election this November.

Democrats desperately wanted the optics of US soldiers, bayonets fixed, confronting, and driving back the ‘peaceful protestors’ from the stores they were burning and looting.

These people truly thought they had Trump boxed in.

They were wrong.


As he did with his COVID-19 response, Trump has avoided the traps laid for him while solving the problem.

As Democrats and their media sycophants relentlessly tried to browbeat President Trump into taking control of states away from the governors and handling the virus response himself, when they weren’t loudly demanding he nationalize entire US industries, he ignored them and solved the problems his way.

Trump created an incredible partnership between federal agencies and private industry the likes of which had not been seen since World War II. He fixed the ventilator shortage issue, the COVID-19 testing issue, and the PPE issue all **without** seizing control or nationalizing anything.


They just cannot beat Trump, but it is fun watching them try.

https://uncoverdc.com/2020/06/06/democrats-can-kiss-their-riot-cycle-strategy-goodbye/
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 12:44 pm
Quote:
Mali: Muslims murder 27, burn some alive in jihad attacks on predominantly Christian villages

Any protests in the works for these kind of atrocities? They happen almost daily. I believe these victims are Black too. If we can protest over one death that is an exception and clearly not the rule why not this?

The media remains silent not offend people that share the same faith with the murderers. They have no problem demonizing white people with only their color as the common thread. Let alone have a honest discussion about what Islam really says. So these murders continue and the hypocrites tearing apart our country are silent. Why?

Quote:
If the roles were reversed, which would never happen and should never happen, this would be an international news story. As it is, you’re likely to hear about it only here. Wrong perpetrators, wrong victims for the establishment media narrative.

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/06/mali-muslims-murder-27-burn-some-alive-in-jihad-attacks-on-predominantly-christian-villages
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Sat 6 Jun, 2020 12:48 pm
Far-Right 'Boogaloo Boys' Are Trying to Incite Violence at Protests

Three men with military backgrounds have been arrested and charged with conspiracy to instigate violence at the Las Vegas protests against the death of George Floyd.

According to authorities, Andrew Lynam Jr., 23, Stephen Parshall, 35, and William Loomis, 40, all met at an anti-lockdown protest in April and self-identified as “boogaloo” boys, a term used to describe those calling for a violent civil conflict. They were arrested on Saturday on their way to a protest in downtown Las Vegas, after filling gas cans and making Molotov cocktails in glass bottles. They face federal charges of conspiracy to damage and destroy by fire and explosives, and possession of unregistered firearms. They are currently each being held on $1 million bond, according to the Star Tribune. They have not yet entered a plea.

Their intention was “to hopefully create civil unrest and rioting throughout Las Vegas,” a complaint filed in Las Vegas District Court on Wednesday said. (Rolling Stone reached out to the three men on Facebook for comment, and have yet to hear back.)

“Boogaloo” has been referred to as an anti-government movement, but it’s not a movement or organization or even a cohesive ideology so much as a meme. “They’re right-leaning and they love their guns,” says Megan Squire, professor of computer science at Elon University, who studies white supremacists and extremists online. “That’s really the extent of a uniting principle.”

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/boogaloo-boys-george-floyd-protests-black-lives-matter-1010117/
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.05 seconds on 01/20/2025 at 10:55:58