@hightor,
hightor wrote:oralloy wrote:Obama really was signing executive orders adding large numbers of law-abiding citizens to the list of people barred from having guns.
Not an issue.
The widespread violations of our Constitutional rights is very much an issue.
That Democrats think that grave civil rights violations are not an issue, however, is exactly why it was so important for the nation to vote the Democrats out of office before Hillary could enact her diabolical plot to overthrow our freedom.
If Hillary had won, right now we'd be well on our way to abolishing the Second Amendment.
hightor wrote:Quote:The language of federal gun laws restricts ownership to people who are unable to manage their own affairs due to “marked subnormal intelligence, or mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease” – which could potentially affect a large group within Social Security, the LA Times reported.
Well gee, that's awful.
It may well be. Even the language of that law might be way too broad to comply with the Second Amendment. And the disturbingly flip way you dismiss the potential violations of people's rights shows just how important it is to vote the Democrats out of office.
However, the text of that law is not the immediate issue here. Obama's executive orders go way beyond the language of that law. Obama banned guns from all disabled people who do not manage their own finances for any reason whatsoever.
And the next executive orders would have gone even farther. Banning guns from people who wear glasses for instance.
Thankfully we got the Democrats out of power just in time. And now we voters need to keep them out of power.
hightor wrote:Voting rights and reproductive rights are under a greater threat.
Obama was enacting executive orders that would have begun the widespread violation of the Second Amendment.
The fact that Democrats think it is OK when they violate the Constitution does not serve to lesson the magnitude of their violations.