monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Ive yet to see some "facts in pink".

You are easily dismissed.

Whoever, feel free to take a sourced article and prove what is said is not factual. I'll wait.

No they aren't

I still think you are nuts, and I don't send PM's to disturbed people. Set is right, soak your head in Clorox.

I just thought I'd give you the experience of dealing you for once.

Quote:

I still think you are nuts, and I don't send PM's to disturbed people. Set is right, soak your head in Clorox.

How many times do you have to be told no one cares what you think on this end?

I can't speak for everybody

About time you are right about something.

Journos, we regret to inform you that President Trump appears to have learned that it’s in his best interest to answer your dopey questions day after day after day:

Evidence That the Virus Is Much Less Deadly Than People Feared Weakens the Case for Maintaining Lockdowns

In other words, no matter what the actual prevalence of the virus is, and no matter how you look at it, that information justifies maintaining the statewide lockdown. One wonders what conceivable results from the antibody study might have caused Ferrer to reconsider the wisdom of that policy.

The question is especially pressing in light of the fatality rate implied by the study. In contrast with the current crude case fatality rate of about 4.5%, Ferrer said, the study suggests that 0.1% to 0.2% of people infected by the virus will die, which would make COVID-19 only somewhat more deadly than the seasonal flu.