monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

**** happens. By October the MSM will be criticizing Trump for his over reaction.

I wouldn't place any large bets on that, if I were you (and I thank the gods I'm not).

The guy posts bullshit from Russia Today and One America "News," what do you expect?

When sources make claims, which they do not support, it is up to the one posting the sources to support the claims, something you don't do.

Since forever--you're always whining about the credibility of others. Sauce for the goose . . .

Look, when you see people playing the role of Republicans in a way that is deplorable, you should be asking whether they've gotten paid to smear the party with deplorable symbolism and imagery.

It is a very logical political tactic to use where votes can be gained simply by deterring voters from voting for the other party.

Have you ever read about the 1968 Democratic National Convention? They are probably still angry about that and thus want to smear Republicans the way they got smeared with deplorables then.

That doen nothing to support your bullshit claim.

That's completely nuts and you know it. What's up your sleeve next? People are deliberately exposing themselves to Coved-19 just to make Trump look bad.????? That is looney tunes John Birch society whack job talk.

I don't believe you.

Let's make it very clear Ll never said that. That is how lies start. No cigar.

Anyone who believes OAN is anything more than a just bunch of lunatics with cameras and microphones should be avoided like the plague. I can't imagine what else they are capable of..but it won't be useful to humanity.

Then you have missed the post where I have proven it. They dot this thread regularly. There are in the progressive thread also.

Nor does it for you to take the side that you are obviously on.

Look, all I am saying is don't be stupid and choose a party based on the desire to dissociate yourself from the identities that have been associated with your party.

If you are embarrassed to be associated with LGTBQ pride parades, but you otherwise really like the Democratic candidate, vote for him or her.

Likewise, don't assume that all the 'deplorables' that sport offensive body art and jewelry or whatever are not planted as a deterrent to you giving fair consideration to the ideas of the Republican party/candidate.

If people can get paid to stand in nice clothing with signs supporting a candidate, they can also be paid to stand in spiked black leather outfits with offensive tattoos and jewelry and hold a sign supporting the candidate they want you to vote against.

It's not rocket science.

The talking head in that vid makes a series of claims which she does not support.

(Her hair is pure television set styling--nobody walks out of the house looking like that. To my mind, that also erodes her credibility. "Look how beautiful I am, everything I say must be true."

Examples of why they should not be believed please. I asked for this before and got no response. What makes them so unbelievable? My posts have shown how the MSM lies, how the NYT and WP lies. Now you show me lies from OAN.

Fine, link the posts. There will be a difference between willful lying, and making mistakes. If they cite their sources, all you can "prove" is that those sources are willfully lying, if not simply mistaken.