Some of you will remember that Steve Bannon once described Trump's media strategy as "flooding the zone with ****". To put it another way, Trump's technique is to overwhelm the information ecosystem with continual falsehoods, misdirection and irrelevancies to prevent citizens from gaining any coherent sense of what is happening and what is actually true.
In the interview with Jay Rosen above, the same point is being made - Trump is always (or very close to always)
setting out to cause confusion and then, under cover of that confusion, pushing his own personal interests. He is absolutely uncaring as to the consequences so long as he gains.
A week ago, he said he had total authority over the states as regards their decisions on how to go forward during the pandemic. Then yesterday he said to the governors, "You call the shots". Those two statements collide in opposition to each other. The first was unsustainable constitutionally but more importantly if he were to maintain it then he sets up a situation where he must inevitably take blame for what goes wrong. Above all, he seeks to avoid that.
Here's what he said this morning. Attend to this because it is important and very dangerous indeed.
Quote:President Donald Trump posted several bellicose tweets on Friday about the states where some people, including his supporters, are protesting their governors’ stay at home orders.
Trump first tweeted “LIBERATE MINNESOTA,” followed by “LIBERATE MICHIGAN,” then “LIBERATE VIRGINIA.”
“And save your great 2nd Amendment. It is under siege!” he added in his tweet about Virginia.
TPM
He, along with allies at Fox etc, is working to bring about a high profile level of insurrection against any state's move to follow the advices of epidemiologists in holding down the spread of the virus. Why? Obviously, he/they are anxious of threats to his reelection from the economic turndown and from his criminal mishandling of the pandemic. That's why he/they are blaming everyone else but Trump. Those tweets are designed to forward the notion that others, not him, are to blame for conditions.
Also, he is seeking to foment anger and distrust
and conflict as a means to fill up the media space with **** and further confuse citizens. He doesn't speak out in any meaningful way against white supremacists like the Proud Boys or the confederate flag wavers or the Bundys because he needs them as loud and visible agitators and as threats to civil equanimity and peace.
Could real violence come as a consequence? Of course. That is the inherent nature of what is being is being threatened even if the main purpose is to sew confusion and discontent and to misinform.