192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 10:51 am
@blatham,
Did it mention that Reid changed the rules the last time he was Majority leader? Is this how you disregard facts? With lame humor?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  5  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 10:56 am
CNN interviewer Tapper with Conway
Quote:
"I'm talking about the President of the United States saying things that are not true, demonstrably not true. That is important."

"Are they more important than the many things that he says that are true that are making a difference in people's lives?" Conway replied.
TPM

Your son savagely attacked an old woman.
Is that more important than all the many elderly people he has helped?
blatham
 
  5  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 11:15 am
When alpha males whine...
Quote:
“My daughter Ivanka has been treated so unfairly by @Nordstrom. She is a great person -- always pushing me to do the right thing! Terrible!” Trump tweeted Wednesday morning.
Politico
We get these tweeted whines from him pretty much every day. It's quite a phenomenon.

If someone wanted to produce a really devastating TV spot (or video designed to go viral) imagine a series of 6 - 8 year olds reading Trump tweets of this sort, stomping their feet and/or on the verge of breaking into tears.
blatham
 
  6  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 01:20 pm
Cranking up the way-back machine...
Quote:
As recently as Jan. 10, Trump said his party would repeal the health care reform law "probably sometime next week," and he'd be ready to move forward on a replacement "very quickly or simultaneously, very shortly thereafter." A few days earlier, Mike Pence said repealing the ACA would be the "first order of business" for Republican policymakers in 2017.


And now, speeding forward to the present...
Quote:
Senate Republicans have not yet begun to work in earnest on a replacement plan for the Affordable Care Act, Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) said on Tuesday. It was a rare public admission of what has become obvious from the outside, as Republicans find both the politics and the substance of Obamacare repeal more difficult in practice than in rhetoric.

"To be honest, there's not any real discussion taking place right now," Corker told reporters in the Capitol.
Benen
Not that the whole GOP "repeal/replace" thing was a con job. Or anything.
blatham
 
  5  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 01:35 pm
The man is a walking self-parody.
Quote:
“You could be a lawyer, or you don’t have to be a lawyer. If you were a good student in high school or a bad student in high school, you can understand this, and it’s really incredible to me that we have a court case that’s going on so long,” Trump told his audience. “I was a good student. I understand things. I comprehend very well, OK? Better than, I think, almost anybody. And I want to tell you, I listened to a bunch of stuff last night on television that was disgraceful. It was disgraceful because what I just read to you is what we have. And it just can’t be written any plainer or better and for us to be going through this.”
Politico

There will be so much comprehending you're going to get tired of all the comprehending.

This isn't just bluster. This is an advanced pathology.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  6  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 01:35 pm
@blatham,
Well, Queen Betty does it quite similar, of course in traditional analogue English way:

when Her Majesty' gives Her most gracious speech to both Houses of Parliament at the State Opening of Parliament, She starts with:
My Lords and Members of the House of Commons.

My government will use the opportunity of a strengthening economy to deliver security for working people, to increase life chances for the most disadvantaged and to strengthen national defences.

My ministers will continue to buy at any possible moment the most wonderful products of my son's businesses: Duchy Originals.
I herewith just can ask my subjects to get some Duchy Originals Organic Original Oaten Biscuits during the commercial break.

...... ... .... .... ....


Too long for a tweet, I know
old europe
 
  6  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 01:41 pm
@blatham,
I thought they had a secret healthcare plan that they would implement immediately, but couldn't tell anybody about.

Or was that the plan for defeating ISIS? Or the plan for how to make Mexico pay for the wall?

Hard to keep up....
blatham
 
  3  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 01:42 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
who the hell is queen betty?
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 01:45 pm
@blatham,
Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith. (Pour les Québécoise: Elizabeth Deux, par la grâce de Dieu Reine du Royaume-Uni, du Canada et de ses autres royaumes et territoires, Chef du Commonwealth, Défenseur de la Foi.)
blatham
 
  5  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 01:52 pm
@old europe,
Yes, it is hard to keep up. But my take on this is that his fans do not care at all about his speech acts and their connection to reality. Actually, let me state that even more strongly.

I think his relationship with his fans is very much like that of professional wrestling promoters and the cheering audiences. Those audiences don't want reality. That's the last thing they want. They don't want to know about the fake blood packets or the hours of choreography or the deals cut in offices about who wins and who loses and how each wrestler is to behave after. They want the lies. They want to boasting. That's the arrangement and contract.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 01:55 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Oh, her! Actually, I've sent a request to the royal family asking if I might purchase some of her dresses after she's passed on. Perhaps that lets on too much about my private life but I feel I'm among friends here.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 01:55 pm
@blatham,
How can it be a con job, when everything they do is a con.
blatham
 
  2  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 02:01 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Well, water is water whether in a cup or in the ocean.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 02:23 pm
Quote:
White House press secretary Sean Spicer said Wednesday that Nordstrom's decision to stop carrying Ivanka Trump's clothing and accessories line is an attack on the president's policies and his daughter.

Spicer told reporters during his daily press briefing that the decision -- which Nordstrom said was a result of poor sales, not politics -- was because of the clothing company's displeasure with President Donald Trump's executive orders and his policies.

"I think this is less about his family's business and an attack on his daughter," Spicer said. "He ran for president. He won. He's leading this country. I think for people to take out their concern about his actions or his executive orders on members of his family, he has every right to stand up for his family and applaud their business activities, their success."
TPM
Clearly, any move anyone might make, whether the media or the courts or citizens marching or business entities, which Trump finds disagreeable is axiomatically an unwarranted and improper political "attack" on him and is motivated only by anger that he won the election.

He won the election. Therefore none of the above should be allowed.

Nothing authoritarian going on here. Nothing at all.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 02:27 pm
Some good news
Quote:
Six weeks into North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper's term, the Democrat and Republican-controlled legislature are locked in a partisan power struggle, leaving a cloud of uncertainty over state government.

Cooper won the latest battle Wednesday as a three-judge panel temporarily blocked a new law that required Senate confirmation for the governor's Cabinet members, using a process similar to what the U.S. Senate does for the president's Cabinet choices.
ABC
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 02:34 pm
This is...um...a head shaker.
Quote:
[Wall Street Journal editor Jerry Baker] has been hesitant to allow Journal reporters to characterize Trump’s false assertions as lies and has suggested that media “elites” are out to get Trump. During the campaign, reporters say, some of his editorial decisions tended to downplay Trump’s transgressions while he urged his staff to be tougher on Hillary Clinton.
Politico
It isn't just that the WSJ is one of America's elite newspapers, it is owned by Rupert Murdoch. And if you want to use a phrase like "media elite" when you are a key part of Murdoch's media empire, implicitly suggesting that the phrase doesn't refer to you, then you're not going to be taken seriously in your claim by anyone with a brain larger than a walnut.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 02:37 pm
@hightor,
I wish he would put a lid on his stream of consciousness blather, but that's not going to happen. He is who he is.

Our last president was so conscious of what he was saying that he was an "uh" pause machine.

These are matters of style.

Ultimately Trump will get judged on what he accomplishes and if he accomplishes half of what he promised, it will only be the haters who remain fixated on his personal style.

Clearly he has his flaws, but who doesn't? The notion that our president should be perfect is absurd, and far too many people equate eloquence (including eloquent lying) with perfection. There used to be a A2K regular who everyone would have defined as conservative who fell in love with Obama's perceived eloquence. He's not been back in a long time but I doubt very much he was happy with the last 8 years.

Part of Obama's appeal was that he was an articulate black man (Remember it was Joe Biden who declared him articulate and clean). Nothing even close to ebonics unless he was trying to be cool or talk to "the brothers." This made a lot of white voters who wanted to vote for a black man, feel comfortable. They didn't care what his ideology was, they wanted to vote for a black man, but they didn't want to vote for a scary one. I couldn't care less how educated or verbose he was, he was a leftist and I sure as hell wasn't going to vote for him so I could prove to myself what I already know.

For good or bad, Trump has moved us to a new place in our politics. Success breeds imitation and watch and see how many "plain speakers" appear on the national stage.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -2  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 02:39 pm
@blatham,
And this is the state of the MSM: Because the DOD could be funneling government money directly to Mr. Trump’s commercial interests, we should all consider that it has or will.

Finn dAbuzz
 
  -3  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 02:41 pm
@blatham,
Where was Tapper's outrage when Obama was lying?
layman
 
  -2  
Wed 8 Feb, 2017 02:58 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

That's almost too funny for words, that one. I posted a quote from a source and then layman (a penetrating intellect with a demanding intellectual integrity) with to the source I'd linked, saw it wasn't complete, and then posted a quote from further down in the piece. Good for him. A thorough man, clearly, and motivated in the direction of a full accounting which might change the color (narrative) of the piece.

But he left something out. It's in bold.
Quote:
The Pentagon made similar arrangements with past presidents, including for the Chicago home of President Barack Obama. The difference in this case, which was reported by CNN on Tuesday night, is that the Defense Department could be funneling government money directly to Mr. Trump’s
commercial interests.


There's a reason I always provide links to sources, you two numbskulls.


There was no need to REPOST that part. You had already done that. That was the ONLY part you chose to disclose.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.46 seconds on 11/10/2024 at 12:15:31