@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
Quote:The simplest way to judge whether we have an exceptionally lethal disease is to look at the death rates. Are more people dying than we would expect to die anyway in a given week or month? Statistically, we would expect about 51,000 to die in Britain this month. At the time of writing, 422 deaths are linked to Covid-19 — so 0.8 per cent of that expected total. On a global basis, we’d expect 14 million to die over the first three months of the year. The world’s 18,944 coronavirus deaths represent 0.14 per cent of that total. These figures might shoot up but they are, right now, lower than other infectious diseases that we live with (such as flu). Not figures that would, in and of themselves, cause drastic global reactions.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/The-evidence-on-Covid-19-is-not-as-clear-as-we-think
What this seems to imply is that the virus itself isn't a hoax, but that the coverage of it is being spun in a way designed to stir up a much bigger response than is warranted.
If that's the case, you're implying a media conspiracy, aren't you? i.e. one where someone decided to identify a relatively irrelevant disease that would be the trigger for many vulnerable peoples' deaths without ever even being noticed, in order to drum up hysteria surrounding it?
Assuming that's not the case, then there must be some reason this virus/disease is different for it to have gained so much attention?
So which is it? Is it a normal disease that has been exploited to generate a media/political/economic frenzy? Or is it special enough to warrant all the attention, quarantining, social-distancing, and other special precautions that it's gotten?