@hightor,
hightor wrote:McGentrix wrote:hightor wrote:If you represent a threat to others. What's wrong with that?
I don't. That's what is wrong with that.
Then you're not in danger of losing your firearm.
That is incorrect. The bill in question unconstitutionally outlaws pistol grips on semi-auto rifles even for people who are not a threat.
It also paves the way for the progressives to resume Obama's efforts to unconstitutionally forbid people from having guns for trivial reasons. Being claustrophobic or anorexic does not make someone a threat. And who knows how far the progressives will take that. I still think progressives will try to forbid guns to people who wear glasses, in honor of their hero Pol Pot.
The bill raises the age of gun ownership to age 21. There are plenty of 19-year-olds who are not a threat.
Then there is the unconstitutional waiting period even for people who have already passed their background check.
It unconstitutionally outlaws silencers for no reason, even for people who are not a threat.
People wrongfully accused under the red flag provisions could lose their firearms despite their not being a threat.
Allowing gun manufactures to be run out of business with frivolous lawsuits will also deprive people of guns even though those people are not a threat.
So yes. As usual progressives are out to violate everyone's civil liberties, and for no reason other than the fact that progressives enjoy violating people's civil liberties.