192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 12:55 pm
@hightor,
You may be confusing the personalities of the politicians you cite with the policies they advocate. Laws and government regulations that unduly restrict individual freedom and choice are themselves the essence of authoritarian government. That these laws and regulations are the result of the advocacy of "progressives" who claim they know what's good for everyone else and design government managed programs to enforce them is itself a hallmark of the authoritarian character of their sponsors, even though, on a personal basis they might not be widely perceived to be authoritarians.

Conversely leaders with characters perceived to be authoritarian, who propose and enact laws that enhance individual freedom and reduce the intrusiveness of government into the lives of its citizens, are hardly authoritarian in any political sense.
revelette3
 
  3  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 01:05 pm
Quote:
Justice Department norms are under siege.

On Tuesday, four career prosecutors quit a case after Attorney General William Barr intervened to demand a lighter sentence for Roger Stone, a longtime associate of President Donald Trump. Then, on Friday, The New York Times reported that, early this month, Barr quietly "installed a phalanx of outside lawyers to re-examine national security cases with the possibility of overruling career prosecutors." The cases include that of Michael Flynn, another Trump associate whose prosecution the president has long criticized.

Newsweek asked legal historian Jed Shugerman, an expert on the Justice Department, to put these controversies in historical context. We also asked him about four Supreme Court cases being argued next month that could actually further beef up presidential power.

In this interview, Shugerman faults Barr for refusing to use special counsels, and calls for structural reforms to ensure greater Justice Department independence in the future.


Newsweek
hightor
 
  4  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 01:06 pm
@georgeob1,
Quote:
Laws and government regulations that unduly restrict individual freedom and choice are themselves the essence of authoritarian government.

For starters, I don't see that scuttling laws which protected the quality of our air and water for the past fifty years has freed us from an "authoritarian" government.
Quote:
Conversely leaders with characters perceived to be authoritarian, who propose and enact laws that enhance individual freedom and reduce the intrusiveness of government into the lives of its citizens, are hardly authoritarian in any political sense.

They are when they brook no opposition, use their power vindictively, and work assiduously to exacerbate social division for political gain.
revelette3
 
  2  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 01:16 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
They are when they brook no opposition, use their power vindictively, and work assiduously to exacerbate social division for political gain.


True, Trump has done it in all areas of the government. You couldn't get more authoritarian than Trump has been allowed to get, virtually unchecked by Republicans in control of the senate.

Stephen Miller Brought White Supremacy Into Our Immigration Policy. Senate Must Hold Him Accountable | Opinion
oralloy
 
  -1  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 03:52 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
wrong. as the test firing video I have posted several times proves, magazine size is not the determining factor, since a magazine change only takes around two seconds or a bit less, it's perfectly possible to kill or wound thirty people with 6 shot magazines in less than thirty seconds. This scales up to killing or wounding a hundred people in about a minute and a half with even small magazines, let alone a hundred round magazine.

That video did not show rifles using five round magazines, and I am unsure that it would be so easy to fire rapidly with a rifle using five round magazines.

But if you don't want to curtail magazine capacity, that's fine with me.


MontereyJack wrote:
It's the deadly efficiency of the gun that's the problem.

Weapons are supposed to be deadly. That's why they are weapons.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 03:53 pm
@revelette3,
Newsweek wrote:
Justice Department norms are under siege.

Good. It's about time we ended this deep state thuggery.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 03:57 pm
@Sturgis,
Sturgis wrote:
I wish it could be accomplished in just 4 years. The ways in which he has gotten rid of legislation and packed the courts, it might be decades before a return to where we were and should be.

Embittered Democrats once wanted us to go back to the way things were before Abraham Lincoln.

We're not going to go back. We're going to go forward.

Mr. Trump is the future of America. Progressivism is the past.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 04:00 pm
@revelette3,
revelette3 wrote:
I don't believe all Republicans are that stupid, I think they are worse than stupid. They don't believe in Trump, they accept Trump and accept everything he does and says.

Progressives want to violate our civil liberties, and for no reason other than the sadistic pleasure that they get from violating our civil liberties.

It is important that we have a leader like Mr. Trump to protect us from progressives.


revelette3 wrote:
What that means for future presidents I haven't a clue. Horrible precedents are being set every day by both the President and his Republican enablers.

The precedent of our President actually exercising the constitutional powers that the Founding Fathers gave him?

What is so horrible about that?
Sturgis
 
  4  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 04:03 pm
@oralloy,
Nobody is attempting to violate or remove your civil liberties. Just use some common sense and put them in check.
Sturgis
 
  2  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 04:06 pm
@oralloy,
You are aware of the absurdity of your statement? Lincoln was a sad sack Republican! No Democrat (self respecting or not) would want to live in a Lincoln type setting.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 04:10 pm
@Sturgis,
Quote:
Just use some common sense and put them in check.

Where is the "in check" in the Constitution? Oralloy is correct.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 04:20 pm
@revelette3,
Quote:
Stephen Miller Brought White Supremacy Into Our Immigration Policy.

See this?
Quote:
Opinion

That is all it is. It is desperation and race baiting. Promoting more division and hate.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 04:20 pm
@Sturgis,
Sturgis wrote:
You are aware of the absurdity of your statement?

I do not agree that facts and reality are absurd.


Sturgis wrote:
Lincoln was a sad sack Republican! No Democrat (self respecting or not) would want to live in a Lincoln type setting.

Like I said....
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 04:25 pm
@Sturgis,
Sturgis wrote:
Nobody is attempting to violate or remove your civil liberties.

That is incorrect. Progressives routinely try to outlaw pistol grips on semi-auto rifles.


Sturgis wrote:
Just use some common sense and put them in check.

It never fails. Whenever someone opposes civil liberties or supports fascism they always invoke "common sense".

It happens every single time.
Sturgis
 
  3  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 04:31 pm
@oralloy,
You keep yapping about fascism. This is not about that.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 04:34 pm
@Sturgis,
You and fascism share the same dislike for civil liberties.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 04:36 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
You and fascism share the same dislike for civil liberties.

Two peas in a pod.
RABEL222
 
  3  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 05:40 pm
@coldjoint,
I assume you mean you and Ollie.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 05:53 pm
@RABEL222,
Quote:
I assume you mean you and Ollie.

Nope.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Mon 17 Feb, 2020 05:58 pm
https://legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Above-stone-LI-600.jpg
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/07/2025 at 06:32:55