192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Builder
 
  -1  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 06:43 pm
@snood,
Quote:
.....during this time that the Republicans are wiping their asses with the constitution and rule of law.


Care to pack out that story with some facts, for a change? Unless you're living in the antarctic, your president was aquitted of all "charges" in the impeachment.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 06:51 pm
@snood,
We're singing the same song. Mine is the higher pitched white voice. We should gather up a couple of others here, get a barber pole and start a quartet. If we can't find a barber pole, then we could just toss one of our favorite site trolls into a blender to get that red/white swirl thing.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 06:52 pm
@snood,
Quote:
Republicans are wiping their asses with the constitution and rule of law.

That is exactly what the Democrats did to create the charges that went to the Senate. The presidents defense showed the complete disrespect for the Constitution by the House Democrats. Only a goldfish would forget that quickly. Again, Democrats treat people like they are stupid and have no memory. People see right through it.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 06:56 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
Mine is the higher pitched white voice.

What is the point of that? Maybe to keep race in this somehow, or show that Snood will toe the line and not call out your racist remark because no one like you could be racist. This is a joke, and it is not funny anymore.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  3  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 07:16 pm
@blatham,
You ok, dude? You’re taking flip to a whole other level.
Builder
 
  -1  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 07:18 pm
@snood,
Quote:
You ok, dude?


Have some compassion, mate.

He's just realised this post of his will be active for another five years, at the very least.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 07:28 pm
@snood,
Quote:
You’re taking flip to a whole other level.

You have not been paying attention. He wishes people dead regularly. Life apparently means the same as his word, nothing.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 07:29 pm
@snood,
I am the epitome of mental health, emotional well-being and sublime calmness. Imagine a Mennonite gentleman standing and facing Donald Trump in a scene written by Quentin Tarantino.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 07:30 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
Actually they're not that great, oralloy. We used to have them in my state because holding a statewide vote was considered "too expensive". They're confusing and can last a long time. They sometimes feature blatant intimidation. Over the years we found less and less participation and it was easy for one faction to dominate the event.

They sound fun to me.

Maybe I wouldn't like them if I tried them. But having never tried them, I'd like to give them a try.


hightor wrote:
If all the states ran caucuses it might be different. In this case, however, it has nothing to do with the mechanisms of democracy and is, instead, an artifice to allow Iowa to go first (since New Hampshire thinks it deserves to have the first primary) and bask in the attention for fifteen minutes.

As far as I know Iowa already had caucuses well before they started going first in the process. Although their caucuses may be why, when the system was changed after 1968, they were chosen to go ahead of New Hampshire.


hightor wrote:
So you know the person(s) who wrote the code for the malfunctioning application and can vouch for their left-leaning ideology?

No, but I know that this was a Democratic event managed by Democrats.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 07:32 pm
@blatham,
Greg Sargent wrote:
Subpoena Bolton
For starters: One of the House committees should immediately invite former national security adviser John Bolton to testify, and if he refuses, subpoena him.

Bolton's forthcoming book will report that Trump privately linked nearly $400 million in frozen military aid to Ukraine directly to his demand for sham investigations validating lies about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election that absolve Russia of that crime and smearing potential 2020 foe Joe Biden.

Bolton's book will also report that as early as last May, Trump instructed Bolton to press the Ukrainian president to work with personal lawyer Rudolph Giuliani on the scheme to extort those announcements from Ukraine.

Learning more about both these episodes -- which Senate Republicans refused to do -- will further illuminate the scope, reach and inner workings of this whole scheme. Bolton can almost certainly detail other episodes implicated with it.

This matters because this scheme is still in operation today. Republicans have been running ads in Iowa that echo the fabricated narrative of Biden corruption in Ukraine. Giuliani has been meeting with former Ukrainian officials to further validate that narrative.

And Trump's attorney general, William Barr, is still pursuing a "review" of the origins of the Russia investigation that appear designed to discredit that investigation -- and its conclusion that Russia sabotaged the 2016 election to help Trump -- just as Trump wants.

What this all means is that post-acquittal, Trump will simply keep up his smearing of Biden with disinformation, including with "evidence" fabricated by Giuliani with the help of foreign officials, as well as his ongoing whitewashing of Russia's 2016 attack on our political system.

A maximal picture of Trump's willingness to corrupt the government in service of this whole effort will better equip the American people to evaluate the disinformation and lies we'll continue seeing on all these fronts. Testimony from Bolton about Trump's orchestration of this scheme will focus public attention on it as it continues.


Hmmm. You might want to try thinking what some other person thinks.

The impeachment inquiry is over. I wouldn't count on the Supreme Court overruling executive privilege and ordering Mr. Bolton to testify before Congress.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 07:33 pm
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:
I am of the opinion that voting should be as easy and as cost-free as possible both for the voters and for the State. It's not just a matter of who cares and who doesn't. Some people have the means to spare one day of work every 4 years, others do not, especially when their boss may not be supportive of their political engagement.

The Democrats don't agree with your ideals. Any time the Democrats pretend to care about letting all the people vote, it is just a smokescreen for some ulterior motive.

I've never been to a caucus, but they really sound like a lot of fun. I'd like to attend one.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 07:34 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
Our newspapers may be overtly political, but broadcasters are subject to different regulations. They have to be seen to be objective and impartial.

Oh nonsense. The BBC is an endless rain of lies and bad journalism. They are good for live coverage of breaking news in the UK and that's about it.
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 07:36 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:
As of right now, I count Eight Congress persons who will not attend the SOTU address.
I think it would be a good thing if no Democrats showed up to legitimize it.

Do it. The speech will be better without any progressives in the room.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -2  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 08:03 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
The BBC is an endless rain of lies and bad journalism.


You left out decades of coverups of career paedophiles on their staff.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 08:03 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:
I think not. Republicans would take it as licence to do the same forever.

The Democrats have already given the Republicans every precedent they need to justify ruining all future Democratic state of the union speeches.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 08:04 pm
@coldjoint,
You are and have always been the troll. Not me. You make totallyt wild-eyed claims and b"back" them up with tight wing xenophobic sites and the least reliable possible websites trying tok pass okff hate filled propaganda as reliable journalism. GIGO.
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 08:08 pm
@MontereyJack,
Posting things that you disagree with is not trolling.

You cannot provide any examples of coldjoint trolling anyone.

To be fair, I don't think you are a troll either, but coldjoint is correct to note that you never back up any of your claims.

Nor can you back them up, as your claims are untrue.


Just as a reminder, trolling is posting something outrageous for the sole purpose of provoking outraged responses. A troll has no ideological bias against the people he or she is trolling. As long as the troll has made someone, anyone, sputter in outrage, they are happy with the outcome.
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 08:16 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:
Like they need license from anyone to flout rules, laws, mores or traditions.

It is progressives, not conservatives, who do that.


snood wrote:
No, I think a large empty space where Democrats would be seated is a perfect response

Why would Republicans leave the space empty?

Go ahead and clear on out. I'm sure they can fill those seats.


snood wrote:
to the Republicans' absence from duty during the impeachment process,

Republicans do not have any duty to help progressives lynch people who disagree with progressivism.


snood wrote:
and this so-called president's absence of character, judgement or substance on all fronts.

Democrats who hate Mr. Trump are exactly like Democrats who hated Mr. Lincoln. History will judge them the same.

Mr. Trump has done an excellent job at preventing progressives from violating people's civil liberties for fun. He is an outstanding president.


snood wrote:
We need to be a little less dedicated to dotting 'i's and crossing 't's during this time that the Republicans are wiping their asses with the constitution and rule of law.

Spare me the histrionics. Where was the Democrats' respect for the Constitution and rule of law when Bill Clinton was president?
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 08:22 pm
@coldjoint,
Yeah. Like saving the economy from the worldwide crash Republicanonomics caused. Working out a plan with our allies to get iran to forego possible nuclear weapons development for 15 years, which trump abrogated and set them free to start nuke research if they wnt to, thenlet the Turks kill our allies the Kurds in the fight against Isis, to unilaterally pulling us out of treaties which have kept peace in the world for decades.?oc, to coming up with phony health plans which lose a million people a year health insurance according to Bloomberg, to pulling us out of the Paris Accords and letting greenhouse gases reach new highs, to let industry pollute our air we breathe and the water we drink. Obama built bridges to make us better and stronger. Trump just lives under those bridges and trolls and gobbles up wunwary passersby.
Builder
 
  -1  
Tue 4 Feb, 2020 08:28 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
milliioptwhgichth end u peace in the world


Time to step away from the crack pipe, MJ.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 5.06 seconds on 11/28/2024 at 10:33:36