@blatham,
blatham wrote:
And more on DeVos
As I said earlier, this appointment is a sop to the religious right (one of the extreme ends of it). Whether her name was pushed by Jim DeMint or someone else, it is another manifestation of movement conservatives frightening level of power in DC now. None of us has any reason to believe that Trump cares a whit about education as he's displayed no interest in it (or in the children and adolescents in the system). The motivation here is consolidation of his power through appeasing the modern hierarchy of power/influence in the party/movement.
Do you claim to know Trump's inner thoughts about the effectiveness of America's public schools? If so what is your basis for such claims ?
You have the very bad habit of dressing your unfounded imaginings up with the currently fashionable words & phrases apparently borrowed from the bloggers you frequent. You certainly don't know Trump's motives or those of anyone else for that matter. Certainly the very dismal results achieved by our very expensive public schools and the very contrasting results achieved by charter schools is enough evidence to persuate any intelligent obdserver,
and constitute a far more plausible explanation than the nonsense you have been offering us here.
I increasingly find very little evidence of anything but intense prejudice and a preconceived perspective in your offerings on these matters. Certainly they contain very little reporting of facts or evidence of curiosity about new events, and even less intelligent analysis or accurately labeled spectulation about them. Most of it is cut and pasted opinion of others, combined with your own overheated imaginings, all involving the same very shopworn theories about "movement conservastism" etc. and none of it ever balanced with consideration of simiular things in other contexts. I find no intellectual content in them if that is your conceit. Do you actually think that stuff constiututes a meaningful contribution to any intelligent discussion?