monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Anything that is faked or misrepresented might not be immediately evident (they'll have that expertise). The goal will be to present some negative story and then get it shoved into media coverage in the US to disrupt and to encourage possible Dem voters to becomes disillusioned and apathetic and then staying home rather than voting.

They're not interested in the truth,

And judging from the direction that attacks took before, my guess is one tact they will take will likely be something that makes him appear racist,

I only talk politics with like minded people.

...Now, if any vulnerable GOP senators do vote for dismissal or against new witnesses, Democrats will work to extract a political price for it. This worries McConnell, who wants to ensure that vulnerable senators can “credibly claim to voters that they took their constitutional duties seriously,” as the New York Times puts it.

And so, if either of those — a dismissal, or no new witnesses or evidence — does take place, the spin would then become that this is a fair and impartial process, relative to the dismissal at the outset that some Trump allies demanded.

Trump’s media allies are also floating another related trick. They are calling for a “one for one” approach: If Democrats get to call former national security adviser John Bolton, then Trump’s defenders get to call, say, Hunter Biden. This is absurd on its face:

Quote:

George Conway
@gtconway3d
It’s also not how trials work in any court. You don’t get to call an irrelevant and spurious witness just because the other side calls a relevant and legitimate one.
https://twitter.com/benjaminwittes
/status/1217060585965326339

Indeed, the idea is likely an obvious ruse: The goal, again, is to spin a no-witnesses outcome as a fair one. This banks on both-sidesing media coverage playing along: Not hearing from witnesses with direct knowledge of Trump’s extortion scheme will get placed on a plane of equivalence with not hearing from the Bidens. Neither side got its way!

When Trump first took office, he signed a slew of executive orders,

They're not interested in the truth, only in hearing that which reinforces their own prejudices.

I only talk politics with like minded people.

Billie Eilish has achieved yet another musical milestone. The 18-year-old pop wonder is recording the theme song for the upcoming 25th James Bond film, “No Time to Die,” becoming the youngest artist to do so. Eilish, who co-wrote the song with her brother, Finneas O’Connell, will follow in the footsteps of such artists as Paul McCartney, Gladys Knight, Tom Jones, Duran Duran and Adele.

I understand that William Barr and the Republican Party at large are considering passing legislation which will immediately upon passage disallow any witness testimony or documentation of any sort prejudicial against those falsely accused in criminal trials.

"This is about fairness. It is about justice for all Americans. It's about transparency. Fake testimony and fake documentation only serve to muddy the waters and to confuse juries and citizens of this great nation. We will not allow such oppression and injustice to continue any further" it's being reported that Barr has confided in private conversations.

The existing power structures in Russia far more likely responsible than something random. Doing damage to any threat to Trump being the goal.

They'll look for anything that can be presented as damning evidence on the Bidens. Truthfulness won't matter of course but that's how it would be presented.

Anything that is faked or misrepresented might not be immediately evident (they'll have that expertise). The goal will be to present some negative story and then get it shoved into media coverage in the US to disrupt and to encourage possible Dem voters to becomes disillusioned and apathetic and then staying home rather than voting.