192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Tue 17 Dec, 2019 06:10 pm
@coluber2001,
Quote:
Many people confuse politics with religion.

In Islam they are the same thing. You are worried about the wrong religion.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -1  
Tue 17 Dec, 2019 07:28 pm
@snood,
Quote:
it would also mean that their constituencies are made up of people so dull-witted and uninformed that they need something so clear as the need to get rid of the orange POS explained to them in short sentences.


If you're going to delve into "modern" politics, try to get the terminology correct, at the least. The plebs react to "sound bytes", which are hatched by seemingly equally dullard writers; the most comical of which likely began the slanted slippery slope of the HRC parade; that being "It's Time". Hell, they didn't even specify time for what, exactly. Maybe an even more vague reference to being time for a women in the hot seat, but not ever really clarified.

Add to that nonsense, a personal insult; that being "Bunch of Deplorables" and the dullards were starting to get the idea that their opinions weren't even part of the equation.

Quote:
The American voter seems to be pretty ******* stupid.


Crass generalisation, considering the fact that most of the states got it right.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 17 Dec, 2019 08:35 pm
@Builder,
Quote:
Crass generalisation,

and arrogance. Give credit where credit is due.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  5  
Tue 17 Dec, 2019 10:52 pm
The Lincoln Project

DEDICATED AMERICANS
PROTECTING DEMOCRACY

The Lincoln Project is holding accountable those who would violate their oaths to the Constitution and would put others before Americans.

WE HAVE SEEN THE BEST
AND WORST
OF AMERICAN POLITICS.

We understand that action must be taken, now, to protect the institutions that have made the United States the greatest nation the world has ever known.

OUR MISSION

Defeat President Trump and Trumpism
at the ballot box.

We do not undertake this task lightly nor from ideological preference. Our many policy differences with national Democrats remain. However, the priority for all patriotic Americans must be a shared fidelity to the Constitution and a commitment to defeat those candidates who have abandoned their constitutional oaths, regardless of party. Electing Democrats who support the Constitution over Republicans who do not is a worthy effort.

OUR INSPIRATION

President Abraham Lincoln led the United States through its bloodiest, most divisive and most decisive period of our history. He fought not because he wanted to, but because he knew the dual goals of preserving the Union and the end of slavery would be achieved only through armed conflict. Lincoln always kept the enormous human cost of the struggle in the front of his mind. At Gettysburg, he implored us not to forget those that had given “their last full measure of devotion” to preserving the American experiment. As it became clear that the Union would be victorious, Lincoln’s thoughts turned to how the nation would “bind up its wounds” and move forward together.

Today, we find ourselves divided again – sectionalism in the country and factionalism in government has led to ever uglier examples of how our political system is failing. President Donald Trump and those who sign onto Trumpism are a clear and present danger to the Constitution and our Republic. Only defeating so polarizing a character as Trump will allow the country to heal its political and psychological wounds and allow for a new, better path forward for all Americans.

https://lincolnproject.us
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Wed 18 Dec, 2019 12:08 am
@BillW,
Quote:
The Lincoln Project

Brainwashed self hating Americans trying to destroy the country.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Wed 18 Dec, 2019 06:37 am
@coldjoint,
Quote:

I bet you will not see this on the MSM.


Wrong. As usual.
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Wed 18 Dec, 2019 06:49 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:

Quote:

I bet you will not see this on the MSM.


Wrong. As usual.

And, of course, e.g. the WP reported it, CNN etc pp
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Wed 18 Dec, 2019 07:50 am
Quote:
I bet you will not see this on the MSM.
The top-drawer experts on MSM are those who don't attend to it.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Wed 18 Dec, 2019 09:01 am
Quote:
Are Republicans afraid of Trump? Hell, no — he's destroying democracy and they love it

Donald Trump hasn't cowed Republicans — he's freed them to pursue their long-buried dream of crushing democracy
Amanada Marcotte - Salon
0 Replies
 
revelette3
 
  4  
Wed 18 Dec, 2019 09:25 am
Read Trump’s Letter to Pelosi
Protesting Impeachment


hightor
 
  4  
Wed 18 Dec, 2019 09:46 am
(How) Corbynism’s Zombie Politics Lost the Election of a Lifetime

What Zombie Politics Are, How They Lead to Defeat, and How Corbynism Came to Exemplify Them

Quote:
How exactly did Jeremy Corbyn and his merry band of idiots lost the most crucial election in a lifetime? There’s been a lot of noise about what can actually be learned from the spectacular failure of Corbynism. I think the lessons are much more pragmatic — and simple — than is thought.

They go like this.

Saint Jeremy and his crusaders chopped off the head of the Labour Party — and then gave it a lobotomy. But the result wasn’t a revolution. The result was a zombie politics. A party that spoke like it was on the left, really believed it was on the left, professed to be on the left — but wasn’t, really. Instead, it accepted and endorsed the goals of the hardest of the hard right. Corbynism failed because it was what I’ll call zombie politics.

Corbynism was the intellectual and philosophical suicide of the British left. It offered the nonsensical, idiot’s proposition of a…national socialism. Yes, really. I’ll come to that. It’s organizational wing, Momentum, was the matricide and patricide of the leadership of the British left. It was made of rank amateurs, playing at student politics…who cost Labour a professional, well-run, effective campaign…in surreal and astonishingly ways. The result of these mistakes — the lobotomy and the decapitation — was the most devastating defeat for the left in modern history.

Let me begin here. A political “message” isn’t the simplistic thing the left often thinks it is. It is a simple message, often condensed into a slogan — but it must contain a theory of causes and effects, which resonate, which speak to people’s growing fears and thwarted chances and frustrated aspirations. A political message must win the war of ideas.

The Tory message was dead simple. What went wrong in society? All those dirty, filthy people who don’t really belong here. Muslims. Arabs. Blacks. But mostly, Europeans. Brits were taught, all over again, to look down on Europeans, to hold their noses, to revel in a kind of atavistic colonial superiority.

So: the Tory message. What’s the cause of our decline, your falling standard of living, your shrinking income and savings, your plunging happiness, the fact that your life seems to have gone into reverse? It’s their fault — those hated, alien others. Simple, easy to digest, absorbed in a microsecond, a little bit fascist, an absurd lie — but absolutely devastating, because it was easy for frightened, broken, abandoned people to believe. And it was easy to spread, too, in a world where competition for attention is brutal: because it’s easy to take in, people have to expend little cognitive or social energy on it.

Now contrast all that with Labour.
What was Labour’s theory of causes? What cause did it assign to what had gone wrong in the UK, resulting in a long, slow collapse? Bizarrely, incredibly, surreally…Corbynism pointed to the very same cause as the Tories. The cause of Britain’s problems were really — at the deepest level — all those dirty, filthy Europeans. Why else back Brexit? So by backing Brexit, Labour was effectively legitimizing the theory, the notion, that those hated others, notably Europeans, were responsible for the mess the UK was in. Because it backed Brexit for years, Labour was effectively saying to people: “The cause of your problems isn’t really the Tories. It isn’t really their vicious austerity. It isn’t complete economic mismanagement. Nope — it’s those dirty, filthy Europeans!” Labour was backing the most conservative idea of all: extremist nationalism. Wait — was it really a left party at all anymore?

Backing an arch-conservative idea was a mistake Labour could never, ever recover from. Instead of blaming the Tories…who’d been in power for more than a decade…and driven the economy into the ground…Labour effectively failed to challenge them at all, at the level of cause and effect, at the level of ideas. Do you see how ruinous this choice was? Not to challenge your opposition at the level of ideas? Not to fault them, to say they caused the problems — not those poor Europeans? How can you possibly win a war you won’t even fight?

Hence, whenever Labour did try to say the problem was the Tories, and their endless austerity, it was left in a mess and a muddle — because it has already conceded they weren’t the problem. How could both things be true? How could the problem be Europeans…and Tories? It was just not a credible position. Nobody believed it. Why would they? The average person was left baffled: wait, hadn’t Labour just said the real problem was those dirty, filthy Europeans? So how could it be the Tories or austerity? Why back Brexit so ardently if the real problem wasn’t those dangerous, conniving Europeans? Labour had undercut itself, undermined itself. Without an internally consistent theory of causes, its proposition to the average voter was a mess: a contradiction, which made no sense, and resulted in a shattering lack of appeal, mass bewilderment and defection.

Now, if you’re going to blame dirty foreigners for all your problems…you’d better be a conservative party. Because you can’t play that game and win being on the left, really, because you’re supposed to be kind, decent, humane, gentle, and wise. So Labour undermined even it’s fundamental virtues and values by backing Brexit — not just made a mess of its proposition — and the result was a wave of bewilderment, alienation, and disappointment. Not just because Labour backed Brexit — but because Labour’s entire theory of what had gone wrong in Britain was a contradictory, muddled, inchoherent mess, which appealed to precisely no one, because it couldn't.

Except, of course, the bizarre, childish fringe left. They had come to run the Labour Party by now, seizing power in a kind of putsch. And it’s crucial to underline just how astonishingly, breathtakingly stupid this clique really was.

It’s hard to see from outside the UK, but Labour had been taken over by a certain kind of person. You know the kind of college leftist who’d condemn you for not being a perfect comrade, communist, socialist, vegan…even though you basically believed in healthcare and education for all…you just made the mistake of liking a nice meal or wearing a nice outfit once? And then they chastised you for it, like little Torquemadas or Cromwells, forever? That kind of person.

Labour had been taken over by puritanical fools — people playing at being leftists…but who were too dumb to know what they had really been doing was…appeasing the hardest of the hard right…all along. See the crucial catch? They were people who believed themselves to be radical communists and glorious leftists — but they weren’t anything close. They were not really leftists at all. I don’t mean that in some kind of sophomoric no-true-Scotsman-way. I mean it in a simple, lethal one. They were so childish, so incoherent, that they were literally unfamiliar with the most basic, elementary beliefs of even Marx, Engels, or Lenin, their self-professed heroes.

What do I mean? Saint Jeremy and the Radical-Chic Communists of the Revolution actually believed that the path to socialism…is through extreme isolationism and nationalism…which is an arch-conservative belief. Wait, what? Literally the fundamental point Marx and Engels make is that if there is to be a glorious socialist revolution, it must be worldwide, and therefore, international solidarity is crucial, otherwise, the capitalists go on winning, dividing and conquering the proles. These weren’t even leftists — they were just college-politics puritans: they really, deeply thought they were morally and intellectually superior to everyone else, pure and wise — but the truth is that they weren’t remotely that, and they were too dumb even to know it.

This fringe of extreme self-described “professional communists” who now ran Labour with an iron fist…were so painfully, incredibly dumb…they didn’t even understand that
…isolationism and nationalism are the most antithetical things to the values of socialism there can possibly be… because they are the elemental right wing beliefs of tribalism and supremacy. After all, socialism is a philosophy of equals — not “We Brits are better than those dirty Europeans!!” Now, I don’t say all that to score points, but to highlight a crucial truth.

The people that had come to run Labour, were, by now, to put it kindly, massive, unbelievable, jaw-dropping fools. They might have had Guardian columns and made appearances on Question Time and the BBC and posts teaching at universities. But they literally didn’t understand even the most elementary tenets of the ideas they claimed to stand for. So what were they good at? Well, if you don’t care much about the larger ideas you’re actually there to stand for, what do you have left? Turf wars, basically. Ownership, power, dominion. Hence, the only thing they were really good at was student politics. It’s infighting, cliquery, purity testing, hectoring, nastiness, and venom. Labour became a mafia of idiot children pretending to each other to be radical communists…because it was fashionable…all the while not even understanding the most basic, elementary aspects of their own politics…so what could they really offer people at all?

This is the crucial point, so I want to say it again. Labour wasn’t too extreme, or too “far left.” It wasn’t really left at all. So what was it?

It was the bizarre, nonsensical, idiot’s contradiction of a nationalist…socialist…isolationist…leftist…party. Wait — a what? It was run by radical chic faux leftists, nightclub communists who didn’t understand anything much about leftism at all, really, and so they ended up offering the average voter an absurd **** sandwich of a contradictory mishmash: a socialist revolution…by way of isolationism and nationalism. The socialist revolution was to happen by leaving the world’s most successful social democratic political bloc. What the? The simple fact was that Labour had been captured by the bizarre paradox of people who genuinely, actually, vehemently thought they were radical communists and revolutionary leftists…yet were too dumb to understand what they actually backed was ultra-right right nationalism…and so the fools who ran it were now proposing the spectacular oxymoron of an extreme right-wing politics, married with tiny elements of left-wing appeasement. It wasn’t too far left. It was too far gone down the express train to Crazy Town: Labour had become an aspiring party of the oxymoronic absurdity of right wing extreme nationalism above, beyond and before any semblance of left wing socialism .

(Hence, in the end, the average voter found that to literally strain belief. They literally didn’t believe it. And so when Labour released their “fully costed” manifesto, the average voter was like: “Sorry, I don’t buy it. We’re poor! We must be. You told us yourselves! We have to leave the EU to be able to have nice things again!! It’s their fault! You said so!” See the problem?)

The average voter was quite correct to reject Labour’s bizarre, gruesome, nonsensical idiot’s politics of nationalist radical-chic socialism. They literally didn’t make any sense. And the average voter didn’t have to run spreadsheets in their heads to get it. It was instant and intuitive that it didn’t compute. If our problems were the fault of those dirty, filthy Europeans…why did we need more socialism? What did nationalizing this industry and that have to do with the real cause of our decline, which was those dirty, filthy aliens? Didn’t we therefore need less socialism, and more, well, fascism? Duh. Labour had committed a kind of profound philosophical suicide.

By now, this astonishingly asinine set of contradictions — ultra-right wing nationalism naively, idiotically believing itself to be radical socialism — had come to be known as “Lexit”. Short for “Left Brexit.”
The bizarre idea that leaving the EU would result in socialist paradise. Wait — the EU, as in modern history’s most successful social democratic project, ever? Leaving that was going to result in…communist utopia? What the? But Lexit and the Lexiters reigned for three crucial years. Three years during which nobody — and I mean nobody — was allowed to point out how painfully, surreally stupid this political proposition was, how it was doomed to fail and destined to lose. Anytime — anytime — any one of the adults pointed to Saint Jeremy and the Student Union Communists now running this debacle…how impossibly foolish this line of logic was…they were shouted down and attacked, viciously, by baying mobs. The dogs of Momentum were loosed upon them.

Wait. Momentum? What’s that?

That brings me to the next chapter in the story. If the first one is about how Labour self-destructed philosophically, the second one is about how it destroyed itself practically.

Instead of professional marketing and branding and strategy, Corbynism relied on a movement called Momentum. It was run by and for the most extreme of the fringe left, discussed above.

Now, they imagined they could build some kind of organic, glorious, peoples’ revolution, comrades doing it for themselves.
They didn’t need grubby, dirty professionals, and their impure real-world practicalities. They’d take it to the digital streets! And the people would choose the revolution!

But what happened instead was the polar opposite. They became something like digital shock troopers — purging, attacking, and vilifying anyone that wasn’t extreme enough and pure enough, even if they were friends and allies. Offer some constructive criticism of the above? Bang! Momentum would come and pay you a little visit. Question Saint Jeremy in any tiny way? The digital secret police would come and knock at your door. Point out the obvious error in all the above? The mob of screaming idiot college leftists would come after you. Didn’t you know the path to true communism was through…fascism?!! Wait, what?

You know the kind of college leftist that would attack you for wearing nice shoes or liking the wrong kind of fashion and art and music…lecturing you about what Lenin thought about what Trotsky thought about what Che thought about…even if you basically believed in a decent society with healthcare and education for all..thus causing you to walk away and roll your eyes? That was the kind of poisonous atmosphere Momentum bred.

To the party’s extremists, it’s fringe of weirdo leftist comrades who were too dumb even to understand nationalism is the opposite of socialism, this — control of major political party — was heaven. It was what they’d always dreams of. But to everyone else, it was hell. Labour’s heartland is — was — the industrial north. What did some unemployed factory worker single mother in the sticks care about…the finer points of…Leninist self-criticism? What did she care about Momentum’s shock troopers attacking some poor sod for not prostrating to Saint Jeremy in the appropriate fashion? What the? Momentum therefore had three fatal results.

First, Momentum became something like a toxic brand. Insiders loved it. Guardian columnists, academics, self-described “professional communists.” But everyone else rolled their eyes the second it was mentioned. And yet because the insiders were now all cheering each other on — they really believed that they were leading some kind of glorious revolution, in which Saint Jeremy would be anointed…even while the masses were walking away, rolling their eyes.

Second, all the adults left the room. The professionals. The ones who had these basic, grubby skills, like communication, strategy, tactics, marketing, branding — even counsel, advice, direction, and guidance. The revolution didn’t need them, after all. Comrades, doing it for themselves. And everytime any adult tried to step in — they were forced out, Momentum’s dogs unleashed.

Momentum was something like a revolution. It had used a digital guillotine to chop the old, wise head off the Labour Party — and replaced it with the infantile brain of a college leftist, which, as we’ve already discussed, was so dumb it was appeasing the hard right, without even knowing it. And so without adults in the room, how could Labour run a professional, effective…adult..campaign…that had any hope of appealing to anyone outside its shrinking bubble of radical-chic faux communists? It couldn't. And it didn’t. That was the third problem.

What happened next? The Tories had adults in the room — professionals from media, advertising, campaigning, etcetera, who had real world skills. That resulted in an actual, professional, strategy — a dead simple one, used to absolutely devastating effect. It was an evil and cruel and terrible one, sure. It went like this. One, lie. Two, use Facebook etc to turn those lies into “ads.” Three, target them at frightened people. Four, hammer those lies home, over and over again, every possible second, relentlessly.

So there was Labour, in it’s happy daydream, imagining that an idiots’ revolution was going to fight a well-planned strategic movement …meanwhile, the people had already walked away from the college leftists running that debacle…while the Tories were bombarding them with literal propaganda, like a virtual Pearl Harbour. Who do you think was going to win that battle?

The Tories absolutely crushed Labour, because Labour literally had no idea what it was doing strategically or tactically, since there were no adults in the room. True — there were professionals, who bought Facebook ads by the bajillions…90% of which were found to be lies. But this strategy was so simple — so simple — that it’s literally the first thing — the very first thing — any decent media, PR, ad, communications, or whatever agency would have said to do. And yet Labour was totally befuddled by it, broadsided by it, ambushed by it — destroyed by it. What the? That shock of encountering the real world and its vicissitudes is vivid proof there were literally no adults left in Labour’s room. They had all been putsched or purged, guillotined or excommunicated, forced out.

Meanwhile, Momentum was still driving people away en masse. There was some irritating idiot college leftist, spouting Lenin at you, calling you a bad comrade for liking decent wine and eating meat and taking your kids to the mall and buying them nice things every so often. What do you think the average person would do? Sit there and take it — like a good little Leninist — or walk away, rolling their eyes? Who do you think was going to win this war?

Obviously, Tories. But — and this is the point — what the hell was Labour thinking? Why didn’t they get a dire need for real world strategy and tactics — let alone grand philosophy? Because they couldn’t. Anytime anyone tried to tell them, because by now its leadership had ossified into a little tribe of fringe leftists…nobody could hear it. Instead, those who tried to warn of this disaster were attacked and purged for trying to help. That is why there were no adults left in the room.

The Tory’s professionalism led to a simple, devastatingly effective three word message: “Get Brexit Done.” Labour’s reliance on rank amateurs, in contrast, led to them having…nothing…no message…no slogan…no brand…no simple, compelling statement of what Labour actually stood for.
The result was that nobody actually did know what Labour stood for. Again, a “slogan” isn’t just some clever ad copy. It’s the distillation of a theory of causes and effects. Only Labour didn’t have one. That’s because even Labour didn’t know what Labour stood for. So what did it stand for? Nothing at all, by now — just a mess of contradictions, a muddle, that led to the most devastating defeat in modern history.

Corbynism is a textbook example of what I’ll call zombie politics. A politics eaten from the inside out, that doesn’t even have the brainpower left to understand it has been captured by its opponents from the very beginning, much less the willpower to do anything about it. Corbynism imagined itself bringing the glorious socialist revolution about…by the means of hard-right ultra nationalism, demonization, dehumanization, walls, borders, tests. What the? That’s not leftism. That’s zombie leftism.

Labour was by now a bizarre, lurching Frankenstein monster, neither dead nor alive. It was run by and for people who thought — really thought — they were radical communists, but were literally so childish they didn’t understand that backing extreme nationalism is right wing politics, not left wing politics. They were so naive they didn’t understand they’d been captured by the hard right before they’d even begun. They had blamed the Europeans all along — not the Tories and austerity — so how could they win what they wouldn’t fight again?

Hence, they offered, finally, too late, something even more bizarre: the mishmash of a vaguely socialist manifesto…under a hyper-nationalist orientation, worldview, philosophy. Labour offered the British people the appalling choice of national socialism lite. What the? And yet nobody was left to point out that this was going to result in inescapabe, inevitable disaster. Because that is a proposition so full of contradictions, so internally incoherent, so nonsensical, that even somebody desperate for bread will walk away.

The real lesson of Corbynism isn’t that it wasn’t too far left. It’s that it wasn’t really left very much at all. It was zombie leftism. The idea that we can only have leftism after we’ve appeased the ugliest and most violent elements of the hard right, expelled those dirty aliens, blamed those subhumans, exiled those filthy foreigners. Sound left to you? Not to me. That’s zombie leftism.

The UK didn’t really have a left party this election. It had a zombie left one. One that was on the hard, extreme right, long before, and far deeper, than it was ever on the left — and too astonishingly dumb to even know it. College leftists, student politics, self-described professional communists — who never appeared to have read a page of Marx or Engels, let alone Lenin or Badiou. Saint Jeremy and his disciplies were so foolish they thought — and still think — the path to the global socialist revolution lies through extreme nationalism and proto-fascism…so vehemently, they destroyed their very own party over it, chopped off its head, and lobotomized its brain. What the? The British public was quite right to reject all that. I don’t fault them at all. Their choice was wise. Nobody should have been on the side of Corbynism’s bizarre, gruesome, idiotic contradiction of a national socialism lite.

That, my friends, is the lesson of Corbyn’s failure. Zombie leftism. What is is. How it thinks. How it comes to be. And that it will always, always lose against the right, because the right offers a living, breathing version of the very same fundamental ideas. And yet zombie leftism something we’ll see afflict more and more societies, as extreme nationalism and fascism rise. The moral of the story is simple: if you appease the ultra right before fighting it…if you internalize its beliefs…if you stand for what it does…what are you really fighting against…and so what can you really win?

eand.co
blatham
 
  2  
Wed 18 Dec, 2019 09:58 am
High-quality character assessment
Quote:
"President Trump...is not likely to casually tempt the impeachment gods. He knows the history here. He will self-regulate."
--Hugh Hewitt, THE FOURTH WAY (published January 24, 2017)

0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Wed 18 Dec, 2019 10:05 am
I thought this may be of interest.

Quote:
Outgoing Supreme Court President Lady Hale has warned against politicians choosing the UK's top judges in a speech marking her retirement.

She advised against adopting a US-style approach "whether in powers or in process of appointment".

The Conservatives have pledged to review the "relationship between the government, Parliament and the courts".

Lady Hale gained public notoriety when she ruled on the prorogation of Parliament wearing a big spider brooch.

She will officially retire from her post when she turns 75 next month - the mandatory retirement age for judges appointed before 1995.

In her final speech in the role, she said: "We (Supreme Court justices) do not know one another's political opinions - although occasionally we may have a good guess - and long may that remain so.

"Judges have not been appointed for party political reasons in this country since at least the Second World War.

"We do not want to turn into the Supreme Court of the United States - whether in powers or in process of appointment."

UK Supreme Court judges are appointed on legal experts' advice, whereas in the US the President can nominate them.

In September, the Supreme Court ruled that Boris Johnson's decision to suspend Parliament for five weeks was unlawful.

Lady Hale delivered that ruling, saying the unanimous decision of the 11 justices meant Parliament had effectively not been prorogued, triggering the resumption of Parliamentary business the following day.

The attorney-general Geoffrey Cox QC told MPs in the Commons there could come a time for "parliamentary scrutiny" of senior judicial appointments.

However, just days later he said that US-style hearings "would be a regrettable step for us in our constitutional arrangements."

During the election, however, the Conservative Party pledged to review the UK's unwritten constitution.

In its manifesto, it said: "After Brexit we also need to look at the broader aspects of our constitution: the relationship between the government, Parliament and the courts; the functioning of the royal prerogative; the role of the House of Lords; and access to justice for ordinary people."

Lady Hale - who was born Brenda Hale, and is widely known as Judge Brenda - became the Supreme Court's first female president when she was appointed in 2017.

Signing off, she joked that you had to feel sorry for the male institutions which had had to adjust.

"If Judge Brenda has inspired a younger generation to believe in the ideals of justice, fairness and equality, and to think that they might put them into practice, Judge Brenda will retire content", she said.

Lord Reed will replace her in January.

Also speaking at the ceremony, he praised her for her handling of the prorogation hearing, calling it "her greatest achievement", with a ruling which would be "of lasting importance".

And he suggested that the spider brooch she wore when delivering the verdict had become "a symbol of swashbuckling womanhood".

She is "an inspiration to women, and especially to women lawyers", he said, adding that he would miss "an inspiring pioneer, a distinguished scholar and judge, and a valued friend."


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-50836164
revelette3
 
  2  
Wed 18 Dec, 2019 10:15 am
Another place it matters when some of these democrats announce their support for the impeachment is in the swing districts which narrowly went for Trump in 2016 and now the polls show in most swing districts, impeachment is slightly in the minority. Consider the vote result in Michigan in 2016. (On Microsoft Edge, I can't, or at least don't know how to copy images) But the result went as follows.

Quote:
Donald Trump 47.3%
Hillary Clinton 47.0%
Gary Johnson 3.6%
Jill Stein 1.1%

https://www.nytimes.com/elections/2016/results/michigan

Aside from noting how much third party votes takes away from Clinton and gives to Trump, the results show how narrowly divided Michigan is. With that, I find Debbie Dingell's announcement in favor of impeachment to be very thoughtful and important. She is taking a risk and she took it in a thoughtful manner. Moreover, she didn't go into the House with a partisan attitude to impeach and resist Trump from the beginning as she articulated in her article in the NYT.

Debbie Dingell: Why I Will Vote to Impeach Trump
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Wed 18 Dec, 2019 11:00 am
@revelette3,
Quote:
Read Trump’s Letter to Pelosi Protesting Impeachment


The buffoon should hire a few editors, fact checkers, and professional writers before unleashing this sort of childish screed.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Wed 18 Dec, 2019 11:14 am
@hightor,
Quote:
The buffoon should hire a few editors, fact checkers, and professional writers before unleashing this sort of childish screed.

The Democrats should find a real candidate. They failed in 2016 and are going to fail in 2020.
hightor
 
  1  
Wed 18 Dec, 2019 11:33 am
@coldjoint,
Quote:
The Democrats should find a real candidate.

I agree. But that doesn't improve the quality of Trump's childish "letter".
coldjoint
 
  0  
Wed 18 Dec, 2019 11:38 am
@hightor,
Quote:

I agree. But that doesn't improve the quality of Trump's childish "letter".

That does not change the fact he was elected. It was not for his skill at letter writing. I do not recall letter writing bought up in the debates. I do not think it will stop his re-election either. Trying to insult the intelligence of anyone is still an insult. It did not work in 2016, it will not work in 2020.
hightor
 
  3  
Wed 18 Dec, 2019 12:29 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Trying to insult the intelligence of anyone is still an insult.

Yes, Trump does it all the time.
Quote:
It did not work in 2016...

It did work for him in 2016.
Quote:
it will not work in 2020.

What are you, the pink Nostradomas or something? You really think he'll lose?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Wed 18 Dec, 2019 01:08 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
"We do not want to turn into the Supreme Court of the United States - whether in powers or in process of appointment."
Very wise.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.46 seconds on 01/12/2025 at 09:07:29