192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Builder
 
  -1  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 02:08 pm
@blatham,
If only the DNC could conjure up something worthy of impeachment.

The prez is pushing for it as well, because it will give Biden and son a chance to put their own necks in the noose.

It's been such a clusterfuck on the D side of fence, even the general populace are doing the eye-rolls.

Here's the Rasmussen's daily presidential approval ratings, which show Trump's approval on the up-and-up.

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 51% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. Forty-eight percent (48%) disapprove.

A swing of 3% in just one week. Way to go, Pelosi.

What the people want to see, is the Dems' platform/policies for 2020.

I mean, can't they win it on their own merits?

Geebus, it's a ******* circus.

Geriatrics' circus, that is.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 03:41 pm
If any of you bothered to watch the latest impeachment proceedings, you'll recall that a prime "message" the GOP ranking member Doug Collins voiced at the outset of his remarks was a dismissal of the scholars in attendance as "lawyers". Gohmert (of course) and others later echoed the sentiment.

This doesn't make any rational sense for a number of obvious reasons. First, the issue at hand was a legal/constitutional matter. Should the witnesses have been priests or plumbers?

Second, the House committee doing this investigation is... wait for it... the judiciary committee.

Third, the ranking member Doug Collins is himself a lawyer. Member Sensenbrenner is a lawyer. Jordan attended law school but never wrote for the bar. Gohmert received his JD degree from Baylor Law school and was (god help us) a judge. Steve Chabot was a practicing attorney for 16 years. Ken Buck got his JD from University of Wyoming College of Law. John Ratcliffe is a lawyer...
Note: I've stopped after the first 7 names listed by wikipedia as members of the Republican Judiciary Committee and every one of those men are lawyers. I'm confident the trend will hold true almost entirely if one checks the remaining 10 GOP members.

So, what the **** was Collins and GOP strategists up to with that initial messaging move? Obviously, to denigrate the scholars who were about to speak as being, you know, lawyers - sneaky people, elite types, intellectuals, and different from real Americans. Given the committee GOP membership, it's readily apparent how cynical and dishonest Collins' move was.

And you can predict to 100% that the same sort of misinformation campaign will surface in response to this...
Quote:
More than 500 law professors say Trump committed ‘impeachable conduct’
WP

As Trump put it, "I love the uneducated". Republicans have long depended on the strain of anti-intellectualism that has marked particularly the right in America. They aren't going to drop it.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -1  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 03:41 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

My kind of girl, that one.

Does it bother you that she’s become a multimillionaire as a ‘servant of the people’?
blatham
 
  2  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 03:47 pm
@Lash,
So did Sanders, you doofus.

There is no necessary logical connection between possession of above average (or higher) levels of wealth and moral behavior. How wealth is achieved is what mainly determines the moral aspect.

blatham
 
  1  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 03:53 pm
Dear Jesus, save us
Quote:
During a White House roundtable touting the administration’s red tape reductions for small business, President Trump lamented low water pressure in sinks, showers, and toilets, saying it’s an issue the Environmental Protection Agency is examining. “We have a situation where we’re looking very strongly at sinks and showers, and other elements of bathrooms,” he said. “They take a shower and water comes dripping out... very quietly dripping out. People are flushing toilets 10 times, 15 times as opposed to once. They end up using more water.” He said the EPA was looking at the issue “very strongly” and was considering “opening up the standard” in areas where there was a “tremendous amounts of water.” “It’s called rain,” he said.
DB
Lash
 
  0  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 04:15 pm
@blatham,
Liar—as you always are.

Sanders is not a multimillionaire.

Why lie??
hightor
 
  1  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 04:22 pm
@blatham,
No...no...no...please, no.

******* dotard.

coldjoint
 
  0  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 04:23 pm
@Lash,
Quote:
Liar—as you always are.

His presence on this thread proves that.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  1  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 04:25 pm
Quote:
Sanders is now estimated to have a net worth of $2.5 million, Forbes reported. His net worth has increased thanks to earnings from three best-selling books. He has made at least $1.7 million from those books. This does not qualify him for the top 1 percent, however, Slate pointed out. You must have a net worth greater than $10 million to be in the top 1 percent.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 04:34 pm
@Lash,
Various sources put his wealth over $2 million. What do you have it at and what's your source(s)?

And would it matter if it is $1.5 million or $2 million? Why?

You used Pelosi's worth as an implied denigration. Where's the demarcation point where denigration with suggestions of corruption can be employed?
blatham
 
  2  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 04:36 pm
@hightor,
I know. And again with "looking very strongly at..." The guy is just such a mess.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  0  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 04:52 pm
@blatham,
You’re supposed to be so smart.
What does ‘multi-‘ mean to you?
blatham
 
  1  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 04:55 pm
@Lash,
Again
Quote:
Various sources put his wealth over $2 million. What do you have it at and what's your source(s)?


As to "multi", I put up two other questions that you should answer.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -1  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 04:56 pm
@Lash,
Quote:
Does it bother you that she’s become a multimillionaire as a ‘servant of the people’?


They don't seem to mind her having a well-connected crime family, so the accumulation of hidden wealth isn't a problem for them.

I'd like to see a list of her actual achievements, over a lifetime of seat-polishing, posturing, and gesticulation.
Region Philbis
 
  3  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 05:12 pm
Quote:
To GOP hypocrites: I never want to hear about Hillary Clinton’s emails again

By Max Boot
Columnist


If there were a global competition for insincerity, President Trump would have won the equivalent of an Oscar, a gold medal, a Ballon d’Or and a Vince Lombardi Trophy combined. You simply could not be more two-faced; it is not humanly possible. His picture belongs in the dictionary under the very word “hypocrisy.”

Trump, recall, spent much of 2016 leading chants of “Lock her up!” because Hillary Clinton made the mistake of employing a private server for some of her official emails as secretary of state. Trump still routinely refers to the former first lady and secretary of state as “Crooked Hillary” as if she had actually committed a crime. Never mind that the Justice Department decided not to prosecute and that a lengthy State Department investigation, completed during the Trump administration, found “no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information.”

And yet, while castigating Clinton for supposedly mishandling classified information, Trump has been engaging in
far more egregious examples of the very same sin.


He began his presidency, in February 2017, by reviewing classified documents and having a highly sensitive discussion about North Korea with the Japanese prime minister not in a SCIF (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility) but in front of fellow diners on a packed terrace at Mar-a-Lago.

In May 2017, he revealed top-secret intelligence to the Russian foreign minister and Russian ambassador during a meeting in the Oval Office, thereby potentially blowing a source of information about the Islamic State. In 2018, he reportedly discussed with wealthy donors at a Manhattan fundraiser the classified details of a battle between U.S. forces and Russian mercenaries in Syria.

In October of this year, Trump revealed details about the raid on Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi that, as NBC News noted, “were either highly classified or tactically sensitive, and their disclosure by the president made intelligence and military officials cringe.” And, according to a White House whistleblower, Trump overruled the opposition of security officials to grant top-secret security clearances to Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump.

But all these security breaches pale by comparison with Trump’s promiscuous use of a cellphone to conduct top-secret conversations. My Post colleagues Paul Sonne, Josh Dawsey, Ellen Nakashima and Greg Miller report that “Trump has routinely communicated with his personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, and other individuals speaking on cellphones vulnerable to monitoring by Russian and other foreign intelligence services.”

This shocking security breach became clear from the cellphone records obtained by the House Intelligence Committee during its impeachment investigation. There are numerous calls between Giuliani and a blocked number listed as “-1” that is widely suspected to belong to Individual 1, i.e., the president of the United States. We also know, of course, that Ambassador Gordon Sondland talked with Trump on an unsecure cellphone from the middle of a restaurant in Kyiv.
(continue reading WaPo)
coldjoint
 
  0  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 05:25 pm
@Builder,
Quote:
I'd like to see a list of her actual achievements, over a lifetime of seat-polishing, posturing, and gesticulation


She can't even keep the **** off the streets in district. She does not give a "****" about her constituents
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 05:26 pm
@Region Philbis,
Max Boot=Super hack. Big time fail.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  1  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 05:42 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
She can't even keep the **** off the streets in district.

Yeah, we all know that Paul Ryan was back in Janesville every weekend shoveling manure, collecting it, and bringing it back to Washington to share with his Republican colleagues. Look at his ****-eating Eddy Munster grin:
https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fstarcrush.com%2Ffiles%2F2013%2F02%2FPaul-Ryan-Eddie-Munster1.jpg&f=1&nofb=1
coldjoint
 
  1  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 06:24 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
Yeah, we all know that Paul Ryan

Paul Ryan was a bought and paid for Rino. He did much more to hurt Trump than help. Call him whatever you wish with my blessing.
RABEL222
 
  1  
Fri 6 Dec, 2019 06:45 pm
@coldjoint,
Say Trumpie, has Trump ever done anything illegal in his life in your opinion? Do you read or watch anything that isent ultraconsertive? Have you ever had a thought that was self generated? One that wasn't told to you by fox news?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.43 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 03:37:41