If any of you bothered to watch the latest impeachment proceedings, you'll recall that a prime "message" the GOP ranking member Doug Collins voiced at the outset of his remarks was a dismissal of the scholars in attendance as "lawyers". Gohmert (of course) and others later echoed the sentiment.
This doesn't make any rational sense for a number of obvious reasons. First, the issue at hand was a legal/constitutional matter. Should the witnesses have been priests or plumbers?
Second, the House committee doing this investigation is... wait for it... the
judiciary committee.
Third, the ranking member Doug Collins is himself a lawyer. Member Sensenbrenner is a lawyer. Jordan attended law school but never wrote for the bar. Gohmert received his JD degree from Baylor Law school and was (god help us) a judge. Steve Chabot was a practicing attorney for 16 years. Ken Buck got his JD from University of Wyoming College of Law. John Ratcliffe is a lawyer...
Note: I've stopped after the first 7 names listed by
wikipedia as members of the Republican Judiciary Committee and every one of those men are lawyers. I'm confident the trend will hold true almost entirely if one checks the remaining 10 GOP members.
So, what the **** was Collins and GOP strategists up to with that initial messaging move? Obviously, to denigrate the scholars who were about to speak as being, you know,
lawyers - sneaky people, elite types, intellectuals, and different from real Americans. Given the committee GOP membership, it's readily apparent how cynical and dishonest Collins' move was.
And you can predict to 100% that the same sort of misinformation campaign will surface in response to this...
Quote:More than 500 law professors say Trump committed ‘impeachable conduct’
WP
As Trump put it, "I love the uneducated". Republicans have long depended on the strain of anti-intellectualism that has marked particularly the right in America. They aren't going to drop it.