192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 02:15 pm
@roger,
roger wrote:
I could be wrong, but I don't think Trump should have to much confidence in his conservative appointments.

I don't think his appointees will violate the Constitution for him. But they will happily enforce the Constitution for him when he presents a good case.

I'm not following this issue closely enough to have any idea whether or not he has a good case to present this time.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 02:17 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
One can make an argument by presenting facts but neglect to tie the facts together in a pertinent manner.

If you or anyone else is confused as to how a fact that I've presented is pertinent, politely ask for a clarification and I'll explain the relevance.


hightor wrote:
It's usually not your facts that are in dispute, it's your conclusions.

If someone wishes to dispute my conclusions, they are free to challenge them. It might actually lead to an interesting conversation.

If they do not actually dispute my facts, then it is dishonest for them to make untrue claims about imaginary instances of me being factually wrong. And it is reasonable for me to counter such dishonorable claims by pointing out my record of accuracy.


hightor wrote:
In addition, many of your statements are tautological

No more so than the statements that I am responding to.


hightor wrote:
and can neither be proven nor disproven.

If I am making a factual claim that you find questionable, ask for a cite. Any alleged difficulty of finding proof will be my problem.


hightor wrote:
Lastly you tend to make sweeping statements of opinion which are subjective beliefs and not worth countering.

If someone does not wish to counter an opinion of mine, then they should just not address that opinion. It doesn't justify them making untrue claims about imaginary errors that I haven't made.

I see all sorts of opinions on a2k that I don't care to address. I just skip on past the post without wasting my valuable time on it.


hightor wrote:
if your IQ is indeed what you claim it to be, you're cowardly to show up here and argue with people whose intelligence is so inferior to yours. Why not challenge those who are your intellectual peers? What are you afraid of?

This name-calling is dishonorable. Shame on you.
blatham
 
  2  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 04:09 pm
Quote:
David Frum
@davidfrum
The future Donald Trump presidential library and casino in Minsk should definitely feature an 24/7 Trump rally , led by an animatronic Trump replica speaking an Artificial Intelligence generated stream of abuse, self-pity, and threats - always changing, always the same
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 04:45 pm
@blatham,
Frum is a Canadian, no one cares what Canadians say.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  1  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 04:47 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
This name-calling is dishonorable. Shame on you.

The virtue signalling does not escape my notice.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 05:03 pm
@hightor,
No virtue signaling. You engaged in name-calling. It doesn't matter that you did so because you can't support your position. It was still wrong.
Builder
 
  -2  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 07:56 pm
@edgarblythe,
Quote:
As a result, the US and UK are facing systemic crises unparalleled in their history.


Paybacks are a bitch. The UK has been dicking around with other nations for literally hundreds of years, and the US of A isn't far behind them.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 08:13 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
You engaged in name-calling

You just implied that I was a "name-caller". Who cares?
Quote:
It doesn't matter that you did so because you can't support your position.

So if I could support my position it would matter? You might want to think that one through.
Quote:
It was still wrong.

You mean you don't have an IQ of 170?
BillW
 
  2  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 08:34 pm
The clown car just keeps on producing. Seems Giuliani is now under investigation for breaking foreign lobbing laws. Who would have thunk it? Actually, only someone totally uniformed would not have been waiting for this moment....
oralloy
 
  -3  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 08:37 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
You just implied that I was a "name-caller".

I directly accuse you of name-calling.


hightor wrote:
So if I could support my position it would matter?

Your name-calling is wrong either way.


hightor wrote:
You mean you don't have an IQ of 170?

My IQ is 170.
hightor
 
  2  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 08:39 pm
@oralloy,
And what name did I call you?
snood
 
  3  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 09:39 pm
@hightor,
Well sir, just as plain as day, you called him a “cowardly if he spars with people of lesser intellect”.

A terrible, not nice, and very bad insult if I ever saw one.
BillW
 
  1  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 09:47 pm
@snood,
.......but, true.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 09:51 pm
@BillW,
Quote:
only someone totally uniformed would not have been waiting for this moment....

That works both ways. The reaction is predictable that they go after Trump associates because they can't get Trump. A pattern that has ruined lives.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 10:08 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
And what name did I call you?

You falsely accused me of being a coward twice today.

Neptuneblue made the same false accusation against me yesterday to try to distract from the fact that she doesn't know anything about military tactics.

You picked up on her name-calling and are now repeating it because you never offer intelligent conversation. All you do is spout name-calling.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 10:09 pm
@BillW,
BillW wrote:
.......but, true.

Wrong again. I have more courage than ten of the likes of you.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 10:16 pm
Puny humans. Hulk smash.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 10:48 pm
Meanwhile:
Quote:
Biden talks ‘gay bathhouses,’ ‘around-the-clock sex’ at the LGBT town hall

Quote:
“And the more people know that, the more they understand it — remember, Anderson, back 15, 20 years ago, we talked about this in — in San Francisco was all about, well, you know, gay — gay bathhouses,” Biden continued. “And everybody — it’s all about around-the-clock sex. It’s all — come on, man. Gay couples are more likely to say together longer than heterosexual couples!”

He says “come on, man,” constantly. It’s annoying and it sounds like a desperate phrase he tacks on to thoughts because he can’t think of anything else to say.

The left is trying to foist this very limited person on us. They literally don’t have one decent candidate in the batch. That town hall last night was a clown show, just an identity politics circus.

He is a peach isn't he?
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 11:32 pm
@coldjoint,
Talk about not having one decent candidate and you're talking about the Republican party.
snood
 
  2  
Fri 11 Oct, 2019 11:49 pm
@MontereyJack,
I know, right? How self-aware can someone be, calling Biden “limited” while supporting a pouty little man-boy with a fifth graders vocabulary and the morals of a garbage scow rat?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.43 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 05:30:29