@Frugal1,
Hey, Fru-Fru, what exactly do you hope to accomplish by continually posting such laughable hyperbole? Is it just for entertainment value? Do you have some deep-seated desire to be a comedian? Honestly, your pronouncements are so incredibly shallow and you seem to be unable to back them up with reasoned discussion — instead we get silly graphics which you don't even create yourself but just pull out of some rightwing trash can. I mean, look at this one:
Quote:One of the most distributing aspects of the recent presidential election is liberal progressive democrats supporting the Islamic death cult that is murdering people all over the globe, shame on lunatic liberal progressive democrats.
1. I'll excuse this mistake (I posted a typo of my own already today) but you do realize it's a mistake, right?
2. Why so many descriptors? Too redundant! Why isn't "Democrats" or "liberals" or "progressives" alone sufficient to make the point?
3. How do Democrats actually support this "death cult"? You seem to imply that every single person who follows Islam is an ISIS jihadist. The practice of contrasting extremist militants with moderate Muslims is done
precisely to avoid giving the jihadists one more recruitment tool. Even some Republicans see blanket denunciation of Islam as playing right into the hands of ISIS.
4. The bulk of Islamic terrorism occurs in societies already undergoing civic strife in Africa and, of course, in the Mideast. The terrorist attacks in Europe and the USA, while reprehensible, are isolated events and the number of victims approaches insignificance when compared to the daily toll of death and cultural destruction in the war-torn areas I mentioned. Salafists are hardly active "all over the globe".
5. "Glass houses", Fru-Fru — the "lunacy" charge is rich when you've got people like Trump and Bannon in power.