monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

The intellectual cowards move in. You still haven't described why you call NYC firefighters liars, glitterbag; many of whom lost their lives because of the usa 9-11 lies.
===========
(1) The explosion hypothesis was common on 9/11

In discussions of the events of 9/11 it is often implied that the original, obvious, and natural hypothesis concerning the destruction of the Twin Towers is some variety of gravity-driven collapse. It was obvious to everyone on 9/11, we are led to believe, that the Towers came down because the buildings simply could not withstand the plane strikes and subsequent fires and therefore gave way. We who say the buildings came down because of explosions—we who hold to an “explosion hypothesis” in the broad sense--are, according to this view, late arrivals. We are folks who came along after 9/11 and over-thought an initially simple situation due to our conspiratorial mind-set.

It is easy to prove that this is a falsification of history. Proponents of the explosion hypothesis were extremely common on 9/11, especially at the scene of the crime, and I have not found the slightest evidence to suggest that they had a special conspiratorial way of thinking. Many made their judgment on the basis of what they directly perceived while close to the buildings. Some accepted as a matter of course that complete and energetic pulverization of these enormous buildings such as took place must have entailed explosions.

I will give five cases to support my claim.


(i) In a video clip preserved from 9/11, ABC television reporter N. J. Burkett is seen standing close to the Twin Towers. He draws our attention to the firefighters at the scene and to the burning buildings themselves. Suddenly, the South Tower begins to come apart behind him. As the pulverized debris shoots into the air, Burkett says: “A huge explosion now, raining debris on all of us. We better get out of the way!” [6]


I see no evidence that Mr. Burkett was over-thinking the situation or had a conspiratorial mind-set. He certainly did not come along after 9/11: he expressed his judgement before the debris of the building had even reached the ground. Then he ran for his life. Half an hour later he would run for his life again as the North Tower came down. [7] --- Prof G MacQueen

Why are you studiously ignoring the usa military nanothermite found in WTC dust, oralloy? It is THEE ONLY explanation for the molten WTC steel, for the molten molybdenum [4753F], for the vaporized lead [3,180F], for the huge volume of iron microspheres found [2800F] 150 times normal, iron microspheres are a MAJOR BYPRODUCT of nanothermite/thermite reactions.

That is you, RABEL, and glitterbag, farmerman, Bernie, hightor, Roger, oralloy, ... .



Are you all saying that NYC fireman Joe O'Toole is a liar? He died of 9-11 related lung disease CAUSED by the Bush government who stated that the dust was safe to breathe. Still you gullible folks trust these liars. Why?

Post ONE FACT that supports the US governments' official conspiracy theory, any one of you conspiracy theorists without a shred of evidence.

So why can't you post anything from these "real" scientists, izzy?

The nine scientists who describe the usa military, 1990s developed nanothermite found in WTC dust are real scientists. Their findings have NEVER been challenged. Why? Because the thermite measures at nano scale. These top nine scientists don't even know how it is made because it is a usa military PROPRIETARY secret.

The unreacted particles when heated react EXACTLY like the US Lawrence Livermore Lab 1scientists tests on THEIR OWN nanothermite.

Even a rocket scientist like you knows that US military nanothermite had NO LEGAL/LEGITIMATE reason to be in WTC dust. That it was and is tells any thinking person that the three towers were imploded.

Does it make you sad? Such empathy is touching and laudatory.

Still got nothing, Snood. Why?

Donald Trump firmly believes that the twin towers were brought down with the aid of explosives. Of course he is correct in thinking this, one of the few times he has been correct. He just is mistakenly on the chain of events.

Wow. That's a poster I'd quite forgotten. Damn there's a lot of people I miss.

Of course he's sad, people reading and digesting information is something he can only dream about.

You are wildly digressing from the thread's topic. You are NOT posting about current politics, Trump, or news. Please stop posting irrelevant nonsense in any future threads that have nothing to do with dangerous, unfounded, poorly sourced conspiracy theories on 9/11 (PS: that happened 18 years ago; you are not American; it's none of your mentally deranged business).

Interesting Israel election.

Israel’s two main parties locked in dead heat as negotiations begin for new government

I am surprised I haven't heard or seen Trump tweet about it. I also wonder if there will be a fundamental change in Israel if Netanyahu is finally out of power?

NYT What would America look like if the John Birch crowd gained real influence? Like it does. Another several years and the nasty Jews will come into their field of vision again.

I know, reading an old thread the other day which kinda got renewed made me realize how many are gone.

Whatever happened to conservative republican's idea of state power? Has it gone out the window along all the rest since Trump has become President? Or is that sentiment only reserved for states ya'll like and approve of?

Trump administration to revoke California’s power to set stricter auto emissions standards

There are threads on that very topic. JTT doesn't post there because nobody reads them. Maybe if nobody read its posts here it might stop.

I don't read them.

Yes. Inevitable but there's no comfort in that.

I don't read them [JTT's posts]
And that is the remedy.

Try being current, tsars. The originator of this thread was the VERY PERSON who asked me the question about the idiot, WF Buckley. Then he, Blatham, intellectual coward that he is, fled the discussion.

The US Federal Grand Jury in NYC investigating the controlled demolitions of WTCs 1, 2 & 7 is very current news, as are all the related issues surrounding that. The Uof A - F study that has just come out that states that WTC7 was blown up, that NIST's WTC7 is a total fraud. Which makes NIST's twin towers "study" a total fraud too. These are very current relevant contemporary events.

Only cowards don't think so. Have you addressed those science questions I asked of you in your science thread?