192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
izzythepush
 
  -2  
Wed 31 Jul, 2019 04:11 pm
@Baldimo,
Your thinking is incredibly simplistic. You don't understand, and I don't have time to waste educating you any more, especially when you don't want to learn.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  -2  
Wed 31 Jul, 2019 04:13 pm
@Baldimo,
I didn't assume anything. I read your posts, it's why I put you on ignore.

And it's best I put you back there. There's nothing positive to be gained in talking to you.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  0  
Wed 31 Jul, 2019 06:28 pm
Quote:
Ronald Reagan’s Long-Hidden Racist Conversation With Richard Nixon

...In newly unearthed audio, the then–California governor disparaged African delegates to the United Nations.

...The day after the United Nations voted to recognize the People’s Republic of China, then–California Governor Ronald Reagan phoned President Richard Nixon at the White House and vented his frustration at the delegates who had sided against the United States. “Last night, I tell you, to watch that thing on television as I did,” Reagan said. “Yeah,” Nixon interjected. Reagan forged ahead with his complaint: “To see those, those monkeys from those African countries—damn them, they’re still uncomfortable wearing shoes!” Nixon gave a huge laugh.
Atlantic
Nothing racist about that.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  -1  
Wed 31 Jul, 2019 06:34 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
Re: TheSubliminalKid (Post 6879099)
Baldimo is a transphobic bigot, don't waste your breath.

Sound of blatham clearing his throat.
Olivier5
 
  0  
Thu 1 Aug, 2019 01:45 am
@izzythepush,
Curiosity.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  -3  
Thu 1 Aug, 2019 03:07 am
Quote:
US President Donald Trump's trade war with China is backfiring and impacting the US economy, according to his former chief economic adviser.

The tariff battle has had a "dramatic impact" on US manufacturing and capital investment, Gary Cohn told the BBC.

The trade war was "a very convenient excuse" for China to slow down its overheated economy, he added.

Mr Cohn, a free trade advocate, resigned from the Trump administration in March 2018.

The 59-year-old former president of Goldman Sachs bank was an unusual hire for Mr Trump because he was a Democrat in a Republican administration.

He also focused on economic internationalism, while the president was set on economic nationalism.

Mr Cohn served as director of the National Economic Council in the Trump administration from January 2017 to April 2018, announcing he was resigning after Mr Trump decided to impose import tariffs on steel and aluminium.

"I think the Chinese economy is driven by credit and credit availability," Mr Cohn told the BBC's Today programme.

"Credit and credit availability is determined by the central government. And they can turn it on and they can turn credit off."

"I think the Chinese economy was going to slow down with or without a trade war," Mr Cohn said.

The idea that tariffs would solve trade imbalances between the US and China was a "long-time view" of Mr Trump's, Mr Cohn added.

However, he said Mr Trump was right to try to tackle China's theft of US intellectual property and blocking of US companies' access to Chinese markets.

"That has to be fixed," he said.

But he warned: "I think everyone loses in a trade war. We are an 80% service economy. The service side of the economy is doing very well, because, guess what, it's not being tariffed."

Mr Cohn said the tariffs had made it expensive to import vital products from China, counteracting the effects of Mr Trump's tax cuts, which were designed to stimulate the US economy.

He said: "When you build plant equipment, you're buying steel, you're buying aluminium, you're buying imported products and then we put tariffs on those, so literally the tax incentive we gave you with one hand was taken away with the other hand.

"So we are not seeing the manufacturing job creation. And I think if we get through this tariff situation, there's a real opportunity to see it here in the United States."


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49187126
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  0  
Thu 1 Aug, 2019 03:53 am
@blatham,
Quote:
Sound of blatham clearing his throat.


After taking another load from the crew.

This place might just be popping for the reader's digest award for incestuousity 2020.
hightor
 
  1  
Thu 1 Aug, 2019 03:59 am
@Builder,
Quote:
This place might just be popping for the reader's digest award for incestuousity 2020.

No such award exists, though.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Thu 1 Aug, 2019 12:08 pm
@TheSubliminalKid,
Quote:
So you think concentration camps that literally starve children to death are fine but going against them isn't?

Which concentration camps released people after being held for 20 days into a country? I'll answer for you, none. People didn't leave concentration camps unless it was ashes. Illegal immigrants are routinely released into the US after being held for 20 days.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Thu 1 Aug, 2019 12:31 pm
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:
People didn't leave concentration camps unless it was ashes.
Obviously you are confusing "concentration camps" (Konzentrationslager) with "extermination camps" (Vernichtungslager).

Characteristic for a concentration camp, apart from the subordination ratio (IKL/WVHA), is in particular the structure of these camps, which was formed according to the "Dachau model".

In contrast to concentration camps, where inmates died not only as a result of individual murders, but also as a result of systematic illness and malnutrition, as well as excessive work, the extermination camps were used solely for the immediate murder of those deported there.
Baldimo
 
  1  
Thu 1 Aug, 2019 12:50 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Your people would be the experts on such things. How many people left those camps after hitting a 20 day limit and were released into Germany to go about their way?
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Thu 1 Aug, 2019 12:56 pm
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:
Your people would be the experts on such things.
We got taught about it at school, in history lessons.
Don't they teach the history of the Holocaust and Nazis in the USA, so you think that those, who have learnt and know about it, are experts?
Baldimo
 
  3  
Thu 1 Aug, 2019 01:01 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
We got taught about it at school, in history lessons.
Don't they teach the history of the Holocaust and Nazis in the USA, so you think that those, who have learnt and know about it, are experts?


I think you are refusing to answer a simple question. I'll answer it for you, no one was released from those camps after 20 days to roam free. They didn't leave the camps at all.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Thu 1 Aug, 2019 01:25 pm
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:
People didn't leave concentration camps unless it was ashes.
In the first years there were periodic releases, including
larger groups of prisoners. Those released had to report daily to the police where they lived.
In the concentration camp I know a bit better, even in 1942 prisoners released.
blatham
 
  3  
Thu 1 Aug, 2019 04:47 pm
@Baldimo,
Quote:
I think you are refusing to answer a simple question. I'll answer it for you, no one was released from those camps after 20 days to roam free. They didn't leave the camps at all.
For the love of god, man. Why not simply acknowledge that Walter knows far more about this than you. And it's understandable that he does. That's no slur on you unless you continue to reject learning when it is readily available.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  1  
Fri 2 Aug, 2019 03:32 am
"We have thousands of ISIS fighters that we want Europe to take, and let’s see if they take them. If they don’t take them, we’ll probably have to release them to Europe."

...Donald Trump, Aug 1, 2019

Evidently he's made a similar threat before. It's almost as if he were trying to effect the behavior of other countries (allies in this case) by trying to terrify them. You know, like terrorists do.

The moron in action!

Builder
 
  3  
Fri 2 Aug, 2019 03:43 am
@hightor,
Quote:
It's almost as if he were trying to effect (sic) the behavior of other countries (allies in this case) by trying to terrify them. You know, like terrorists do.


You mean like Obama did to Libya's people?
hightor
 
  0  
Fri 2 Aug, 2019 04:04 am
@Builder,
Firstly:
Quote:
Effect as a verb means to bring about. It usually shows up with nouns like “change” or “solutions".


Quote:
You mean like Obama did to Libya's people?

You could say that but it's a stretch. There was already a civil war going on — it's not as if he were holding a threat over the head of a peaceful nation. But go ahead and call it what you wish. Why not bring in that old hag, Hillary while you're at it — Pizzagate was serious too. And you might as well add the fake moon landing as well:
Builder wrote:
Anyone who thinks they landed that thing on the moon, and then dropped it back in the ocean of Earth, isn't too bright.

It's pretty funny that people still think this **** actually happened.


izzythepush
 
  -1  
Fri 2 Aug, 2019 05:32 am
Quote:
North Korea has fired two projectiles which South Korean officials say appear to have been a new type of short-range missile.

The launch, the third in just over a week, came from North Korea's east coast early on Friday.

The string of tests are being seen as reaction to planned military exercises between South Korea and the US.

On Thursday, the UK, France and Germany called on North Korea to engage in "meaningful" talks with the US.

After a closed-door meeting at the UN Security Council, the countries said international sanctions needed to be fully enforced until Pyongyang had dismantled its nuclear and ballistic missile programmes.

The latest launches happened at 02:59 (17:59 GMT Thursday) and 03:23 local time from the Yonghung area in South Hamgyong province into the Sea of Japan, also known as the East Sea, according to South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS).

It said the missiles flew very low - at about 25km (15 miles) - and travelled about 220km. Analysts said they appeared to have been unusually fast.

A spokesperson from South Korea's presidential office said there was a high possibility they were a new type of short range ballistic missile, similar to those fired last week.

The launch site appeared to have been a new one, said Ankit Panda, adjunct senior fellow at the Federation of American Scientists.

However US President Donald Trump said he was not worried with the recent spate of launches, as they were "very standard" and not part of recent talks with Kim Jong-un.

On Wednesday, the North launched two missiles that flew 250km and reached a height of 30km before landing in the Sea of Japan, also known as the East Sea, according to South Korea.

The South identified the missiles as a different type from previous models. But on Thursday, Pyongyang gave a different assessment, saying it had tested a new rocket launcher system, without providing details.

On 25 July, the North had fired two other missiles, one of which travelled about 690km.

That launch was the first since Mr Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un held an impromptu meeting in June at the demilitarised zone (DMZ), an area that divides the two Koreas, where they agreed to restart denuclearisation talks.

North Korea has recently voiced anger over planned US-South Korea exercises, an annual event which the allies have refused to cancel but have scaled back significantly.

North Korea sees the drills as preparation for war and has called them a "violation of the spirit" of the joint statement signed by Mr Trump and Mr Kim at their first face-to-face talks in Singapore last year.

Pyongyang had warned the exercises could affect the resumption of denuclearisation talks.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said on Monday that he hoped these talks could start "very soon", but that there were no further summits planned.

Last year, Mr Kim said North Korea would stop nuclear testing and would no longer launch intercontinental ballistic missiles.

Nuclear activity appears to be continuing, however, and satellite images of North Korea's main nuclear site last month showed movement, suggesting the country could be reprocessing radioactive material into bomb fuel.

Pyongyang also continues to demonstrate its abilities to develop new weapons despite strict economic sanctions.

It conducted a similar short-range missile launch earlier in May, its first such test since its intercontinental ballistic missile launch in 2017.

North Korea also showed off a new submarine recently, which South Korean officials have determined is capable of carrying up to three ballistic missiles.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-49199157<br />
Sturgis
 
  -4  
Fri 2 Aug, 2019 12:34 pm
Meanwhile, fibbing does not always go well...

John Ratcliffe has been scratched from the running for National Intelligence Director.

Trumples says he told Ratcliffe, "how miserable it would be for him and his family" .

www.politico.com/story/2019/08/02/trump-rep-ratcliffe-out-of-the-running-to-be-national-intelligence-director-1445150

Still not known whether Trump meant the misery would befall Trump family or the Ratcliffe family...
(Trump likely doesn't know either)
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.42 seconds on 05/19/2024 at 12:01:20