192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Sat 6 Jul, 2019 08:29 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
148% rise in the DOW and almost a tripling of the S&P,

Fine. Nothing about letting ISIS grow? What about 5 killers for a traitor and 1.5 billion to a known terrorist nation? "Trayvon could have been my son" "the police acted stupidity" One crippled race relations the other started a war on police. The guy wanted to weaken us as much as he possibly could and redistribute our wealth and sovereignty.
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Sun 7 Jul, 2019 03:02 am
Britain's man in the US says Trump is 'inept': Leaked secret cables from ambassador say the President is 'uniquely dysfunctional and his career could end in disgrace'
Quote:
• EXCLUSIVE: Sir Kim Darroch used secret cables to impugn Trump's character
• Top diplomat warned London President Trump's career could end in 'disgrace'
• Bombshell comments risk angering the notoriously thin-skinned US President
• He describes bitter conflicts in White House as 'knife fights', sources confirmed
• And claims President's economic policies could wreck the world trade system
• Says Presidency could 'crash and burn', 'we could be at start of downward spiral'

[...]
In the memos, seen by The Mail on Sunday following an unprecedented leak, Sir Kim:

Describes bitter conflicts within Trump's White House – verified by his own sources – as 'knife fights';
• Warns that Trump could have been indebted to 'dodgy Russians';
• Claims the President's economic policies could wreck the world trade system;
• Says the scandal-hit Presidency could 'crash and burn' and that 'we could be at the beginning of a downward spiral... that leads to disgrace and downfall';
• Voices fears that Trump could still attack Iran.

In one of the most sensitive documents, Sir Kim writes: 'We don't really believe this Administration is going to become substantially more normal; less dysfunctional; less unpredictable; less faction riven; less diplomatically clumsy and inept.'

He also says that he doesn't think Trump's White House will 'ever look competent'.

In reference to Trump's ability to shrug off controversies in a life which has been 'mired in scandal', he says that the President may nonetheless 'emerge from the flames, battered but intact, like [Arnold] Schwarzenegger in the final scenes of The Terminator'.

He warns senior politicians in London: 'Do not write him off.'

The leak is embarrassingly timed for the British Government, coming just weeks after the Queen welcomed Trump and his family with a 41-gun salute and a State banquet at Buckingham Palace as part of a diplomatic drive to secure a post-Brexit free-trade deal.

In a memo sent after the visit, Sir Kim warned that while Trump and his team had been 'dazzled' by the visit, and the UK might be 'flavour of the month', Trump's White House remained self-interested: 'This is still the land of America First'.

The Washington Files span the period from 2017 to the present, covering everything from Trump's policy in the Middle East to his 2020 re-election plans.
[...]
The most incendiary paper is a letter to National Security Adviser Sir Mark Sedwill sent on June 22, 2017 – 150 days into the Trump administration – and copied to what Sir Kim describes as a 'strictly limited' number of senior figures in Downing Street and the Foreign Office.

The document, sent ahead of a National Security Council discussion on the UK-US relationship, paints a damning picture of the President's personality and leadership style.

It says media reports of 'vicious infighting and chaos' inside the White House – dismissed by Trump as 'fake news' – are 'mostly true'.

And referring to allegations of collusion between the Trump camp and Russia – since largely disproved – the memo says: 'The worst cannot be ruled out.'
[...]
One memo, sent by Sir Kim on June 22, refers to 'incoherent, chaotic' US-Iran policy, adding: 'Its unlikely that US policy on Iran is going to become more coherent any time soon. This is a divided Administration'.

He questioned Trump's recent claim that he aborted a missile strike on Iran because it would have caused a predicted 150 casualties, saying it 'doesn't stand up'.

'It's more likely that he was never fully on board and that he was worried about how this apparent reversal of his 2016 campaign promises would look come 2020' – at the next Presidential election.
... ... ...

Quote:
https://i.imgur.com/FDdKVXi.jpg
Builder
 
  0  
Sun 7 Jul, 2019 03:16 am
@Walter Hinteler,
The whole British exchequer is loaded with paedophiles and ephebophiles.

What the **** would they have to fear from Trump, otherwise?
roger
 
  1  
Sun 7 Jul, 2019 03:31 am
@Builder,
Well, thanks. You sent me to the dictionary with ephebophile.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Sun 7 Jul, 2019 04:09 am
@Builder,
"Britain's man", Sir Kim Darroch, isn't a member of her[ i]Her Majesty's Exchequer[/i] but a senior British diplomat (joined the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in 1976), who since January 2016 has been British Ambassador to the United States.
Builder
 
  0  
Sun 7 Jul, 2019 05:00 am
@Walter Hinteler,

The fact that he has been knighted, indicates an inner-sanctum residence, does it not?

Quote:
An Elizabethan writer once observed that an ambassador “is a good man sent abroad to lie and intrigue for the benefit of his country”. It is hard to imagine Sir Kim Darroch, Britain’s ambassador to the US, dealing in falsifiable untruths. Darroch has nevertheless cultivated a good poker face. Two years ago, Donald Trump suggested that Nigel Farage, the former leader of Ukip and the antithesis of a Foreign Office diplomat, should take over: “He would do a great job!” Trump tweeted. One could sense the shudder going through Whitehall. A hundred blind eyes were turned; a thousand lips bitten.

News of Trump’s advice appeared not even to have reached the ears of Theresa May, Britain’s prime minister. Darroch kept his job. His access to senior Trump officials is among the best in Washington and he has only good things to say about Trump. “I have met him seven or eight times and always found him to be absolutely charming,” says Darroch. “What I find about this administration is that they are mostly anglophiles and always good at hearing contrary opinions.”

Darroch’s pull is enhanced by his official residence — the only building that Edwin Lutyens, Britain’s most celebrated late-imperial architect, designed in North America. Completed in 1930, it is arguably Washington’s finest embassy. Roughly 10,000 people are invited to the residence every year in an unending upstairs, downstairs roster of anteroom breakfasts, grand ballroom dinners, genteel suppers on the Palladian terrace overlooking the city and postprandials in the library.

The genius of the building is that it caters to what Americans think Britain should look like. It was Downton Abbey-on-the-Potomac decades before that television drama was conceived. “It is hard to think of a better architecture for its purposes, which is a gathering of Americans here on British soil,” says Darroch.


source
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  2  
Sun 7 Jul, 2019 05:02 am
@roger,
Quote:
You sent me to the dictionary with ephebophile.


Ephebophilia is promoted in "our" media today. Most people convicted of paedophilia are actually ephebophiles.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Sun 7 Jul, 2019 05:29 am
@Builder,
Builder wrote:
Most people convicted of paedophilia are actually ephebophiles.
The difference between ephebophilia on the one hand and paedophilia on the other is that ephebophiles have a sexual interest in boys or young men who have already reached puberty.

Even if it's "promoted" in your media today - the term was used the first time by Magnus Hirschfeld in 1906.
farmerman
 
  2  
Sun 7 Jul, 2019 05:45 am
@Walter Hinteler,
modern language does NOT embrace precision. I see words being improperly used in the news papers and the talk-talk media. Just this week , after the Cali earthquke, the NYT reporte the "strain buildup" that will "cause greater earthquakes". STRAIn is not a descriptive term of the energy involved in earthquakes. It is a precise word that describes the non-rigid deformation that occurs BECAUSE of an earthquake.
People hear a word, think theyve got something new and greater, when actually its often gobbledegook.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  1  
Sun 7 Jul, 2019 06:07 am
I seldom bother to read any of these posts anymore but this one was rather amusing. With minimal substitutions it can easily be turned into "The Trump Populist Argument Outline". It merely describes tribal behavior on online forums. There's nothing inherently conservative or liberal about this sort of argumentation — they use the same techniques.
Quote:
So, the only reasons to continue a dialog with a [Trump Populist] after the initial statement of facts that established your victory are for entertainment and educational purposes. If you refuse to take the bait and demand the topic remain on the original premise, they will eventually just go away and try to find someone else that will engage them on their terms.

Good luck with that!
hightor
 
  1  
Sun 7 Jul, 2019 06:15 am
It’s Nancy Pelosi’s Parade

“If the left doesn’t think I’m left enough, so be it,” she told me.

Quote:
SAN FRANCISCO — Nancy Pelosi and Donald Trump have a lot in common.

Neither one drinks, yet they have family vineyards. They both love big bowls of ice cream. Their last names are — depending on the shade of the state — curse words. Pelosi was once dubbed “Mussolini in a skirt,” while she has compared the Donald to Il Duce, clocking their shared need to be at the center of all conversations.

And the most powerful woman and most powerful man in the country are both devilishly good at trolling — usually one another.

“If he could be president, this glass of water could be president!” Madam Speaker exclaimed disgustedly, as we ate omelets in a restaurant by the bay after she mingled with adoring constituents in last Sunday’s glittery, feathery Pride parade. Many in the crowd were still grateful to Pelosi, now 79, that in her first moments on the floor of the House in 1987, as the plague decimating gay men raged, she defied the advice of Democratic elders and sang out that she had come to Washington to fight AIDS.

She regarded the little box of chocolates I brought her with delight and said, “Now we’re talking,” popping one in her mouth as I asked about something less sweet.

Some House liberals have been furious with the speaker since she capitulated to Republicans and Democratic moderates and agreed to pass a bill to send more funding to the border, giving up demands for stronger protections for the migrant children ensnared in the nightmare of shelters there.

“The Mighty Moderates,” as The Times christened them, wanted to show that they weren’t going to be pushed around by the liberals, who have so far gotten all the attention.

I asked Pelosi whether, after being the subject of so many you-go-girl memes for literally clapping back at Trump, it was jarring to get a bad headline like the one in HuffPost that day — “What The Hell Is Nancy Pelosi Doing?” The article described the outrage of the Squad, as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts are known.

Pelosi feels that the four made themselves irrelevant to the process by voting against “our bill,” as she put it, which she felt was the strongest one she could get. “All these people have their public whatever and their Twitter world,” she said. “But they didn’t have any following. They’re four people and that’s how many votes they got.”

She has withstood attacks from left — and right — before, after all. Some top Democrats who called me before the 2018 midterms, urging me to write a column saying that it was time for Pelosi to go, admit now that they were wrong and that they love the way she put together a winning coalition and has gotten into Trump’s head.

While Democrats have been wringing their hands over whether a woman can beat Trump, or whether they should settle for getting one on the ticket as a helpmeet to a white male, Pelosi has offered a master class, with flair and fire, on how a woman can spar with Trump.

She pinned the blame for the border bill on Mitch McConnell. In an era when millennials prize authenticity, she said, McConnell is “authentically terrible.” She has had a working relationship with him for years but now, she says, the Senate majority leader has “really crossed a threshold with me.” The trim speaker, wearing white pants and a purple cardigan to match her purple Manolo heels, stabbed her fork into one of my home fries.

“With all due respect, the press likes to make a story that is more about Democrats divided than the fact that Mitch McConnell doesn’t care about the children,’’ she said, referring to what she called “trash” stories about a supposed rift between her and Chuck Schumer. She also accused the press of “constantly enabling” Trump by allowing him to suck up all the oxygen and says journalists are “accomplices to their own denigration.”

“You would think that within a couple of days, 48 hours or so, of seeing that little child with her father, there would have been some challenge of conscience,’’ she said of Republicans. “But understand this: They don’t care.”

The fracas over the border bill illustrates the treacherous nature of Pelosi’s job. Even with all her remarkable skill, it is a herculean task to weave together her anarchic progressives and the moderates who helped flip the House by winning in districts where Trump won in 2016.

On top of that, many Democrats see Pelosi as the thin blue line — albeit in fiery orange and hot pink hues — standing between them and a lawless Trump.

While the president was squandering millions to prove his manliness by rolling out tanks and jets on the Fourth, Pelosi was holed up at her vineyard getaway in Napa with her family, eating Mexican food, rereading the Mueller report and preparing to unman the president with a thousand legal and legislative cuts.

While the number of House Democrats who want an impeachment inquiry is growing — it’s up to 80 now — Pelosi knows that giving in to that primal pleasure could backfire.

Is the Fifth Avenue trust fund baby who loves to play victim actually goading the Democrats into impeaching him?

“Oh, he’d rather not be impeached,’’ she said. “But he sees a silver lining. And he wants to then say, ‘The Democrats impeached me but the Senate’ — he won’t say Republicans — ‘exonerated me.’ The thing is that, he every day practically self-impeaches by obstructing justice and ignoring the subpoenas.”

Pelosi announced in a letter to her members on Wednesday that the House will hold the Trump administration in contempt on the census donnybrook.

I asked about the Politico report that she privately told Jerry Nadler and other Democrats about the president: “I don’t want to see him impeached, I want to see him in prison.”

She said, “I didn’t exactly say that,” and noted: “You can’t impeach everybody. People wanted Reagan impeached but that didn’t happen. O.K., they impeached Clinton for something so ridiculous — getting impeached for doing a dumb thing as a guy. Then they wanted to impeach Obama.” And now comes Trump, who she says, “has given real cause for impeachment.”

I ask her if the president ever pressured her on the issue.

“He may have one time said something like, ‘I’m glad you’re not doing this impeachment because there’s nothing there,’” she said. “But that means nothing to me.”

The speaker, who is trying to keep the party center left, must know that getting Trump out of office is a goal that could be jeopardized by the fact that the Democrats lurched so far left in the first debates, with bilingual pandering and talk about busing and decriminalizing illegal border crossings and abolishing private health insurance.

This is the pol whose name was synonymous for decades with extreme San Francisco liberalism. (A “Saturday Night Live” sketch in 2006 depicted Pelosi, played by Kristen Wiig, talking to a pair of chain-and-leather-clad aides, one with a ball-gag in his mouth.) Now, astonishingly, the woman formerly scorned as a pinko is the voice of moderation, urging the kids to turn down the music and slow their roll or risk having a second unbearable helping of Trump.

“If the left doesn’t think I’m left enough, so be it,” she said, breezily. “As I say to these people, come to my basement. I have these signs about single-payer from 30 years ago. I understand what they’re saying. But we have a responsibility to get something done, which is different from advocacy. We have to have a solution, not just a Twitter fight.”

What does she think about the latest sexual assault accusation from E. Jean Carroll, the New York writer, who said Trump attacked her in a Bergdorf’s dressing room in the ’90s?

“I respect the case she has but I don’t see any role for Congress,” Pelosi said. Still, she marveled: “How’s he president? ‘Access Hollywood,’ porn stars, all the rest? So what else is new about him?”

I ask her if dealing with the Neanderthals who were still roaming the Capitol’s marble halls when she first got to Congress taught her how to handle a cave man like Trump.

She said that the president is always “courteous” with her in private, but also conceded: “I’ve never encountered, thought about, seen within the realm of my experiences as a child or an adult, anybody like this.”

Does she ever confront sexism anymore on the job?

For an answer, she picks up a mini-gavel emblazoned with a pride rainbow that she’d been carrying during the parade, and pounds it on the table, looking mischievous.

Now Pelosi is in her element, ready for the fight of her life with Trump.

“Everyone thought she was at the sunset of her career and she’s written a whole new act,” one of her former critics recently gushed to me.

Two of the men who tried to run her out of office — Tim Ryan and Seth Moulton — are now floundering in the presidential race, while Pelosi keeps moving forward, a shark with a permagrin.

Trump called Pelosi from overseas to congratulate her on passing the border bill.

“I actually think if he were here, we might have had a better shot” at getting more of what the Democrats wanted in the bill, she said. “One thing he understands is the public view of things.” She said that when she urged Trump to speak to Xi Jinping about religious freedom for the Uighurs and democracy in Hong Kong, he typically was focused on the size of the crowd at the protests. “Did you see they had two million people in the streets?” he asked her, impressed.

If combating an inhumane Trump requires a superhuman effort, Pelosi may be just the woman to do it. Her staffers tell the story of how, last April, Pelosi was with a congressional delegation in Dublin, about to deliver a major address to the Irish Parliament. As she got into her Suburban in the motorcade, a 300-pound armored car door was accidentally closed on her right hand, crushing it in the locking mechanism. The attending physician could offer her only ordinary Band-Aids to stop the bleeding from the wounds on her hand and Advil for a tear so bad that doctors who stitched her up afterward said that she could have lost her fingers.

Pelosi not only managed to get through the speech. She shook hundreds of hands without flinching.

When I asked her about it, she was only rueful that she couldn’t concentrate enough to speak the Gaelic she had practiced.

“But Bono came,” she said with her bright grin. “And that really was fabulous.”

nyt/dowd
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  1  
Sun 7 Jul, 2019 06:51 am
@hightor,
Quote:
With minimal substitutions it can easily be turned into "The Trump Populist Argument Outline".

Of course it could but that does not mean it does not apply to liberals too. In fact the origin if based on fact will prevail. And the facts rest with the results of Trump's policies not the rhetoric that denies his successes.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  4  
Sun 7 Jul, 2019 07:27 am
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Nothing about letting ISIS grow? What about 5 killers for a traitor and 1.5 billion to a known terrorist nation? "Trayvon could have been my son" "the police acted stupidity" One crippled race relations the other started a war on police. The guy wanted to weaken us as much as he possibly could and redistribute our wealth and sovereignty.
So when your argument about econ blows up in yer face you shift your attention to something else.
"redistribution of wealth"--Boy, talk about being stuck in the 1950's. Do you know the amount of billionaires an multimillionaires and plein millionaires that emerged during the Obama years??? Prhaps you should do some research before talking via your anal sphincter

It was on Obama's watch that we got bin Laden. HE HAD the final call on that one. Plumps lies about "Finally the military prsonnel are getting raises" are ludicrous.

coldjoint
 
  0  
Sun 7 Jul, 2019 10:45 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
So when your argument about econ blows up in yer face you shift your attention to something else.

Actually I did not want to argue about manipulated numbers from partisan sources. You mention billionaires and those are the people who thrived under Obama, the 1%.
Quote:
Study finds top 1% thrived under Obama. The rest of us not so much

https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2017/12/study-finds-top-1-thrived-under-obama.html
Quote:

It was on Obama's watch that we got bin Laden. HE HAD the final call on that one.

What else would the call have been? What president would not kill him? Why are you saying nothing about the 1.5 billion to Iran and the terrorists released for a traitor? Or his big mouth trashing the police and interfering in investigations before they were finished trashing any racial progress?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Sun 7 Jul, 2019 07:05 pm
Watching CBS News.

FYI: Trump just scored his highest approval rating.
coldjoint
 
  1  
Sun 7 Jul, 2019 07:16 pm
@Lash,
Quote:
FYI: Trump just scored his highest approval rating.

Ouch!!!! Shocked Laughing
Ragman
 
  3  
Sun 7 Jul, 2019 08:02 pm
@Lash,
Who cares? Polls don’t matter. Elections only matter. Ask Hillary.
MontereyJack
 
  0  
Sun 7 Jul, 2019 08:55 pm
@coldjoint,
Yes he did. And he's STILL underwater.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Mon 8 Jul, 2019 04:27 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
ephebophiles have a sexual interest in boys or young men who have already reached puberty.


The gender of the target isn't specifically boys, Walter; it's pre-pubescent, and early pubescent children, as opposed to very young children and babies, for paedophiles.
Walter Hinteler
 
  0  
Mon 8 Jul, 2019 05:06 am
@Builder,
I'd thought, parthenophilia was ... well, never mind.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.45 seconds on 10/05/2024 at 08:15:51