192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
layman
 
  -1  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 01:35 am
@layman,
Sez here:

Quote:
Embattled German Chancellor Angela Merkel is doubling-down on her controversial Muslim immigration policy despite a massive pushback by right-wing parties in Germany and its European Union member states, including neighboring Austria.

Merkel’s stubborn stance has become the bane of her Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party. Voters have punished CDU at the ballot, dealing the party a massive blow in the last round of elections on September 4.

The election was a deafening clarion call for change, forcing Merkel to head “toward national elections next year more politically vulnerable than at any time since her early days in office, with implications that extend far beyond Germany’s borders,” according to the Times. “Her continued defense of her decision to admit more than a million migrants to Germany last year has left her increasingly isolated from other leaders coping with anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim sentiment in their electorates, especially after terrorist attacks.”

Even members of Merkel’s own party are now turning on her, condemning the German Chancellor as weak and naive.


http://www.dailywire.com/news/9068/merkels-muslim-immigration-policy-collapsing-michael-qazvini

True that, Walt?
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 01:57 am
Quote:
Sexual assault of women en masse was unheard of in modern Germany since the rape of Berlin in 1945, following the invasion of Soviet troops. But it became an abrupt reality again in 2016.

The news from Cologne shocked Europe, though the incidents were at first covered up to protect migrants. Police reports show that more than 2,000 men were involved in the sexual assaults. Only 120 of them were ever identified by the authorities. Those who were found were given suspended sentences of a year or less.

According to the tabloid Express, the government is trying to find and prosecute a leaker in their own ranks who gave the press confidential information – namely, that the German government requested that Police did not include the word “rape” in their Cologne report.

Among the German population there are now repeated accusations that German media has an agenda set by the government and that it sets editorial demands in line with the government’s wishes, which are dictated by politics and ideology.

Many German media outlets refused to name or indicate the ethnic origin or religious affiliations of the assailants, fearing that they would feed racist and xenophobic sentiment. The Police did the same and it was only later revealed that they were under orders not inform anyone about the criminal activities of migrants.

Politicians and the media appear afraid to name the the origins of the Cologne attackers, possibly believing that such facts would be politically incorrect, destroy cultural cohesion in Germany, go against Angela Merkel’s plans or have some other, mysteriously undisclosed social consequence.

The scale not only of sexual assaults but of journalistic malpractice, police cover-ups and government involvement in the censorship of private citizens’ opinions is not widely known in Germany because it is not reported. Only thanks to new community-run social networks did the events of Cologne become such a national scandal that mass media had no choice but to start covering them.

There is no sign that any foreign-born criminal, legal or illegal, will be deported for his crimes. State president Hannelore Kraft said they can’t be, as their home countries wouldn’t accept them back. Officials doubt any of them will be convicted...

Residents of Düsseldorf formed a city watch that has over 13,000 members, with the goal of protecting women. Immediately, media and politicians denounced the group, demanding proactive measures taken against it, under the pretence of a fear about “mob justice.”

Accusations of racism and far-right politics were instantly dished out by the government. In other words, Germany’s elected representatives have begun to punish Germans attempting to protect themselves because the government won’t do its job. Again, the media has been complicit in spreading the party line.

At the same time, Muslim leaders such as Imam Abu-Yusuf in Cologne have publicly said:”The women themselves carry responsibility for the attacks, when they run around half-naked and perfume themselves.”


Germany sounds like a cheese-eater's heaven, eh?
layman
 
  -1  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 02:14 am
Well, OK, then!

Quote:
TRUMP MULLS EXPELLING UNEMPLOYED IMMIGRANTS

President Trump is considering an executive order targeting immigrants for deportation if they are dependent on government assistance, a draft document suggests.

The draft order obtained by The Associated Press calls for the identification and removal “as expeditiously as possible” of any foreigner who takes certain kinds of public welfare benefits.

Such immigrants have been barred from the US for the better part of a century and they can already be deported. The proposed order appears to signal a Trump administration effort to vigorously crack down on such welfare cases.


http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/world/iraqs-parliament-votes-to-retaliate-against-donald-trumps-muslim-ban/news-story/3690c4bf699b6ceb3efb3e372fa45e38?nk=330717d7018b8c3b67c9eb5ffdaa127c-1485850084

Finally some real law enforcement, eh?

The gravy train aint runnin no more, Abdul.

America First, Baby!
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 02:18 am
@layman,
layman wrote:
Germany sounds like a cheese-eater's heaven, eh?
Indeed. And we really have some nice - though outside Germany rather unknown - cheeses here, like the Alpine mountain cheeses, "herder's cheese", various sour milk cheeses, a variety of smoked cheese.
But even in the smallest supermarket we get dozens of various other European cheeses - most supermarkets have a separate cheese department where you cheese from the original piece ...
layman
 
  -2  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 02:24 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Heh, Walt, a separate cheese department, eh? Aint that special.
layman
 
  -1  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 02:29 am
@layman,
I sure hope they don't come after that mexican clan that lives across town, though. They're all crack addicts and they sell me their food stamps for 10 cents on the dollar, ya know?

Sheeit, I might go hungry.
layman
 
  -1  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 03:02 am
Quote:
n September 2015, the Center for Immigration Studies published a landmark study of immigration and welfare use, showing that 51 percent of immigrant-headed households used at least one federal welfare program — cash, food, housing, or medical care — compared to 30 percent of native households.

The key findings:

— The average household headed by an immigrant (legal or illegal) costs taxpayers $6,234 in federal welfare benefits, which is 41 percent higher than the $4,431 received by the average native household.

— The average immigrant household consumes 33 percent more cash welfare, 57 percent more food assistance, and 44 percent more Medicaid dollars than the average native household. Housing costs are about the same for both groups.

— At $8,251, households headed by immigrants from Central America and Mexico have the highest welfare costs of any sending region — 86 percent higher than the costs of native households.

The greater consumption of welfare dollars by immigrants can be explained in large part by their lower level of education and larger number of children compared to natives.

The new report follows another that found President Obama seeking $17,613 for every new illegal minor, more than Social Security retirees get.


http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/cashing-in-illegal-immigrants-get-1261-more-welfare-than-american-families-5692-vs.-4431/article/2590744

Them free-loaders gotta go, sho nuff. Trump is gunna cut some fat, and get this country back on solid fiscal footing again.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  5  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 03:11 am
@layman,
layman wrote:
Heh, Walt, a separate cheese department, eh? Aint that special.
No, the butcher department is separated as well.
layman
 
  0  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 03:15 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Stop making **** up, Walt. We all know that Germans only eat sausage, and nobody in their right mind call that "meat."

Quote:
Almost 50 percent of sausage is made from processed left over parts of a pig including blood, guts, organs and, of course, head meat.
Walter Hinteler
 
  6  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 03:29 am
@layman,
Well, that depends on what kind of sausage you mean - there are about 1,500 different kinds of it (The smaller local butcheries wouldn't have more than 30, 40 though.)
But what they have all in common is: they've got two ends.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  4  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 03:54 am
@Frugal1,
Quote:
Trump's approval numbers will rise after firing the acting AG, he did the right thing.

Haha — why do you care about the rigged polls? All we've heard since November 9th is gleeful dismissal of polls, pollsters, and the "dishonest media". You can't very well turn around and use them to illustrate the public support for Mr. Trump. You might be better off continuing to argue that they're "fixed" and pointing to the low *reported* level of support for Mr. Trump's immigration policies as proof.
blatham
 
  3  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 05:03 am
The man who murdered Muslims at prayer in Quebec
http://www168.lunapic.com/do-not-link-here-use-hosting-instead/148508133442220?7358826795

Quote:
Bissonnette was described in media reports as an ardent nationalist and a strong supporter of the French far-right politician Marine Le Pen. He was known to activists in Quebec for taking positions against feminism and refugees, said François Deschamps, of the pro-refugee group Bienvenues aux Refugiés, on his Facebook page.
WP
blatham
 
  2  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 06:20 am
Normally, if a Justice official disagrees on the legality of an administration order (or a congressional act) the response will be, "We disagree with the legal finding and will prepare a legal challenge"

With Trump, it's BETRAYAL.

It is an authoritarian response. Administrative and judicial are separate branches by design. Justice is not the servant of the the administration.
blatham
 
  2  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 06:27 am
Will have to verify this but it seems there is an order of succession in the case of an AG (or acting AG) death, resignation or dismissal. If that's so, then three other officials were asked - and refused - to accept the legality of the Trump EO.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 06:31 am
Quote:
Fox News ✔ @FoxNews
Suspect in Quebec mosque terror attack was of Moroccan origin, reports show http://fxn.ws/2k9is8W
9:31 AM - 30 Jan 2017

I didn't know Fox had done this but I'm not at all surprised they did. Are you?
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 06:31 am
@blatham,
One of those terrorists shot and stabbed to death Jo Cox, the British MP. Another massacred nine churchgoers in Charleston.
And now these six Canadians were gunned down at evening prayers in Quebec City.
layman
 
  -2  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 06:38 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

It is an authoritarian response. Administrative and judicial are separate branches by design.


1. Another lefty who think the Department of Justice is part of the "judicial branch," eh? Where did you cheese-eaters get schooled, anyway?

2. Let's see now---An Obama flunky undertakes to defy the law, appoints herself as the ultimate authority and ORDERS every other attorney in the Department to refuse to defend the order is NOT "authoritarian," but Trump is an "authoritarian" for firing her sorry ass for refusing to fulfill her duties?

Heh.

You're right, though. Trump is her boss. He's the one with the ultimate authority over the entire executive branch and he exercised his authority. That's definitely authoritarian, sho nuff.

That authoritarian skank doesn't represent herself or her political party as AG. Every action she takes in her official capacity is in the name of, and for the interests of, the people of the U.S. She doesn't have to "agree" with the law. Her job is to enforce it, not re-write it to suit her own sorry self.

0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 06:38 am
Not being a lawyer, I'm unfamiliar with the intricacies of immigration law. I do know that Mr. Trump campaigned on a promise to tighten our borders and I wasn't totally surprised that he issued an EO based on that promise. I wasn't totally surprised by the reaction of his political opponents either, but I did wonder why his administration didn't take a little more time to come up with something better thought-out and more workable.

Instead of relying on people like Giuliani they could have gotten together with immigration experts and diplomats familiar with the issues and come up with a well-crafted order that may have taken a little bit of time but would have addressed any constitutional concerns about religious discrimination. I know this sort of "in your face" decree is red meat for the Trumpenproletariat but I thought that on such a sensitive issue, so early in the term, they might want to be seen as reasonable and seek a bit more consensus. Instead we get a ham-fisted edict which upsets our allies and leads to worldwide condemnation as the ill-prepared administration attempts to deflect criticism by going on an offensive, threatening diplomats, firing the acting AG, and (of course) blaming Obama.

I wondered why they would want such a divisive policy when, with a modicum of goodwill, they might have been able to draft an EO, backed with appropriate legislation, which would satisfy security and human rights concerns. Surely some sort of incremental tightening of existing requirements phased in with plenty of advanced warning could have prevented a lot of the media-covered hysteria. But I really shouldn't have been surprised:

"If the ban were announced with a one week notice, the "bad" would rush into our country during that week. A lot of bad "dudes" out there!"

Positively Churchillian!

blatham
 
  3  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 06:39 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Yes. Bigots R Us is a successful business model presently. Expanding franchise.
blatham
 
  3  
Tue 31 Jan, 2017 06:44 am
@hightor,
Producing an atmosphere of confusion, chaos and disorder is a strategic feature of what Trump and Bannon are doing. It's an authoritarian impulse and method. Potential opposition is set on its heels. If you remember in "Gulag Archipelago", the Soviets did their arrests late at night when everyone was sleeping - victims, neighbors.

And we ought not to forget that while all this noise was going on, Bannon got moved into the principals' meetings. And that is a very big thing and very much out of the norm.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.46 seconds on 05/05/2025 at 09:19:39