192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
nimh
 
  3  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 12:57 pm
@livinglava,
livinglava wrote:
Should criminals be given the upper hand?

I kind of admire the contortions involved in arguing that new laws to keep guns from criminals' hands amount to giving criminals the upper hand.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 01:05 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
This is the far right in action. They say something then accuse everybody else of hysteria for taking them seriously.

Then even though the original comments are recorded they'll deny even making them and start yelling 'Fake News.'

As someone who lives here I have to admit I've never met anyone, including Tories, who has a good word to say about Trump. He's universally disliked.
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 01:11 pm
@nimh,
Quote:
I kind of admire the contortions involved in arguing that new laws to keep guns from criminals' hands amount to giving criminals the upper hand.

No contortions, it's a fact that most criminals don't legally purchase their guns, they can't pass a background check. How exactly do you propose to keep guns out of the hands of criminals?
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -2  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 01:12 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
This is the far right in action. They say something then accuse everybody else of hysteria for taking them seriously.

You have just described CNN and MSNBC for the last 2 1/2 years. Constant lies about Trump working with Russia.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 01:46 pm
Quote:
If Donald Trump had been inclined to wind down a bullet-proof window in The Beast as he passed through central London, he may well have wound it straight back up.

The public were kept a long way from his motorcade but the boos were loud, the placards stark and the general message expletive-laden.

And beyond that, in Parliament Square, under the gaze of a statue of a hunched Winston Churchill, British satire was on display.

A Donald Trump baby blimp rocked back and forth in a light wind.

A man was dressed as a caged gorilla with a Donald Trump face mask while his companion pulled off an impression of Boris Johnson - the MP who wants to be the next UK prime minister - dressed in a striped prison uniform.

There were toilet rolls for sale bearing the president's face, sold for two for £5 from a couple of supermarket trolleys.

A police officer went above and beyond to hand out Haribo sweets to his colleagues standing in a neat line along Whitehall.

Above them, builders in hard hats watched events unfold from the scaffolding encasing Big Ben.

It was all very British.

But it wasn't just the British who were there to protest.

US holidaymakers gave up a day's sightseeing in the capital to let their president know what they thought of him.

Nineteen-year-old student Jess Renner, who was too young to vote in the last US presidential election, headed down to the protest from her nearby hotel with her mum.

"It was fun to come and flip him off," she said. "He's a bully and he's trying to bully you guys into buying all our stuff."

Fellow American Robert Kihm, from Denver, Colorado, said having Mr Trump for a president was no longer funny.

"It's embarrassing and ultimately frightening."

What's your message to him? "Where do I start," he replied, in exasperation.

"Stop being authoritarian, respect the rule of law and stick to the norms for a US president," he urged.

A group from Belgium on a three-day trip to London also couldn't resist having their say.

"He said Brussels was a hell-hole so we are also very against him," said Annelie Comeyne, from Ghent.

Not everyone felt the same.

A minority, including Lorraine Chapel, from Chiswick, in west London, was there to welcome the president.

"Love him or hate him, Mr Trump runs America and he is here by invite from the Queen," she said, waving her handmade sign.

The blimp of a baby Donald was offensive, she said. "Suppose they did that for the Queen in America".

In a flash, things turned rather ugly when a woman appeared next to Ms Chapel, accusing her in strongly-worded terms of supporting misogyny.

Meanwhile, a heated exchange played out in the background as Trump supporters took on anti-Trump protesters before the debate veered back to domestic arguments around Brexit.

A little later, the atmosphere lifted as speakers took to a temporary stage outside Downing Street where Mr Trump was holding talks with the outgoing Prime Minister Theresa May.

"Say it loud, say it clear," the speaker shouted over the microphone, as the rain kept falling.

"Donald Trump's not welcome here," the crowd hollered back, from under hoods and umbrellas.

Some had their faces covered with #trumpstinks masks, others wore badges saying "another nasty woman against Trump".

There was whooping and whistling as police officers cautiously managed the growing numbers, opening and closing routes.

Mothers with small children in buggies rubbed shoulders with seasoned protesters and American ex-pats.

Melissa Branzburg, originally from Miami but now living in Greenwich, said President Trump has been talked about in her house for a long time.

Her children - Isaac, five, and Ruth, three - would usually be doing crafts or playing in the park but today they were getting a lesson in political activism.

They were keen to let Mr Trump know they didn't want him here in London, said Ms Branzburg.

They asked a lot about children behind bars in the US, something she tried to explain in age-appropriate language.

"I want them to know they can make their voices heard and can see that other people agree with them," she added.

Florence Iwegbue, a dual US-British citizen, wore bright pink feathers in her hair and red, white and blue glitter on her cheek.

She said she feared Britain might be following too closely in US footsteps.

"The message is not getting through that the way of life in America does not work," she said.

"In the US, you can't afford to be poor, sick, black or brown. This is becoming an issue in Britain - and it needs to be dialled back."


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48517606
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 01:47 pm
@nimh,
Quote:
keep guns from criminals' hands

I like it when people think criminals are going to obey the law. Next.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 01:51 pm
Quote:
Anti-Trump protesters were filmed chanting ‘Nazi scum’ to a fan of the president before hurling a milkshake over him.

Metro.co.uk reported earlier that Pro-Trump supporters have been barricaded inside a pub by police as clashes broke out in London during Trump’s state visit.

In the shocking video, a large group of angry demonstrators could be seen surrounding the man – who was wearing a Make America Great Again cap – before throwing the McDonald’s iced drink over him.

They shouted ‘Nazi’ to the man in Parliament Square before they started pushing him around. The man, who said he was from London but did not want to be named, said he was ‘angry’ to have been targeted.

Another clip showed Trump supporters behind a line of police at the entrance to a pub in Whitehall as a much larger crowd chanted: ‘Nazi scum off our streets.’

The milkshake throwing echoed attacks on Nigel Farage and Tommy Robinson last month.


https://metro.co.uk/2019/06/04/protesters-shouting-nazi-scum-throw-milkshake-trump-supporter-9811411/<br />


livinglava
 
  1  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 01:59 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

Quote:
Anti-Trump protesters were filmed chanting ‘Nazi scum’ to a fan of the president before hurling a milkshake over him.

Metro.co.uk reported earlier that Pro-Trump supporters have been barricaded inside a pub by police as clashes broke out in London during Trump’s state visit.

In the shocking video, a large group of angry demonstrators could be seen surrounding the man – who was wearing a Make America Great Again cap – before throwing the McDonald’s iced drink over him.

They shouted ‘Nazi’ to the man in Parliament Square before they started pushing him around. The man, who said he was from London but did not want to be named, said he was ‘angry’ to have been targeted.

Another clip showed Trump supporters behind a line of police at the entrance to a pub in Whitehall as a much larger crowd chanted: ‘Nazi scum off our streets.’

The milkshake throwing echoed attacks on Nigel Farage and Tommy Robinson last month.


https://metro.co.uk/2019/06/04/protesters-shouting-nazi-scum-throw-milkshake-trump-supporter-9811411/<br />


I don't understand the use of fascist tactics to attack the presumption of nazism.

I associate nazism much more with socialism than with liberty, which is why I'm a republican.

Maybe there are Trump-supporters who sympathize with nazism, but then there are also socialists who maintain views, political attitudes, approaches to government and economics, etc. that are in line with national socialism and fascism of the 1930s.

Fascism comes down to bullying and throwing a milkshake at them and yelling at them to "get off our streets" is about as fascist as you can get without banishing the person to a ghetto and/or shipping them off on a train to get rid of them. Of course getting milkshaked is better than getting shot or beaten, but should any of it be happening? If someone has a political opinion that's pro-Trump, that opinion should be respected as part of a complete spectrum of political ideas in a free society, no?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 02:01 pm
@izzythepush,
I think that when police barricaded Trump supporters in the Wetherspoons, it was torture (Fuller's London Pride!)
izzythepush
 
  1  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 02:09 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Wetherspoons is an appropriate choice.

The last time I went to one was many years ago, an old work reunion that someone else arranged.

It was terrible.

I've got two really nice alehouses within spitting distance anyway.
RABEL222
 
  2  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 02:26 pm
@izzythepush,
If you think you Europeans hate Trump how do you think we liberals feel about the crooked sob. The electorate are too stupid to recognize a con man. All he has done is screw up a government that wzsent that great by putting a whole raft of thieves and cheats in charge of government.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 02:40 pm
Interesting, that people who have a government that censors the news and arrests people for what they say calls anyone Nazis.
Quote:
The UK’s dangerous attempt at internet censorship.

https://www.studentsforliberty.org/2017/07/25/uks-dangerous-attempt-internet-censorship/
Quote:
From April, the United Kingdom formally reintroduces governmental censorship. It’s supposed to be against pornography online, but there’s no such thing when it comes to censorship; pornography is merely — and always — the first thing on a long list to be censored. It never stops there. You should be deeply concerned about this, regardless of your stance toward pornography on its own merits.

Nazis
https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/blog/2018/03/one-month-from-today-uk-reintroduces-censorship/
Notice the dates of the links. It is worse now.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 03:22 pm
@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:
You are entirely right

Nope. He was wrong to say that the fact that I am wise enough to not pay attention to silly nonsense says anything at all about my attention span.

And he was wrong to say that I don't pay attention to things that I disagree with. The whole reason why the left is so frustrated with me is because I take the time to point out facts and reality whenever they spout leftist gibberish.

So he was entirely wrong in everything that he said.

And you were entirely wrong to falsely say that he was right about anything.


revelette1 wrote:
which is why it is best just to state the facts and show proof of said fact and then move on with oralloy

Stating facts and backing it up with evidence would indeed be the best way of dealing with me.

But you never have any facts or evidence, so that makes this course of action rather difficult for you to carry out.


revelette1 wrote:
and a few other ostriches we have here in political A2k threads.

If I don't pay attention to a subject, it is because that subject is not very interesting to me.

If you are foolish enough to pay excessive attention to subjects that bore you, that's your business.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 03:27 pm
@nimh,
nimh wrote:
No law can ensure that nobody will ever commit murder again.

But:

1. That's nothing to do with the point about "outlawing" it. Outlawing won't stop it from ever occurring again, but you can definitely outlaw it. I'm guessing you agree that some things should be outlawed (murder, for example) even if that doesn't guarantee it will never happen again.

2. Laws can't banish murder and crime from the earth, but I assume you do believe laws can help keep the number of times people commit murder or other kinds of crime down... or do you think the whole apparatus of police, courts, prisons serves no effective purpose at all?

We already have laws against murder though.

MontereyJack has demanded that I come up with a way to prevent any murders from happening at all.

At the same time that he demands that I single-handedly solve all of the world's problems, he is not even attempting to propose any solutions of his own.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 03:29 pm
@nimh,
nimh wrote:
I kind of admire the contortions involved in arguing that new laws to keep guns from criminals' hands amount to giving criminals the upper hand.

Has someone proposed a new law to try to keep guns out of the hands of criminals?
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 03:31 pm
From livinglava:
Quote:
Fascism comes down to bullying and throwing a milkshake at them and yelling at them to "get off our streets" is about as fascist as you can get without banishing the person to a ghetto and/or shipping them off on a train to get rid of them.

Needs to be repeated. Who is doing the bullying the Left of the Right? The Left. It happens right here. It doesn't work, but it is the thought that counts. They would eliminate any opinion that is not theirs if they could.

That just is not right.
livinglava
 
  0  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 03:36 pm
@nimh,
nimh wrote:

livinglava wrote:
What's a more effective way to instill fear and intimidation than to start small and gradually increase the level of violence? It's like the Gestapo starting with a light tapping on the door and gradually increasing the level until they pound the door down.

That's... not what happened though. Beating opponents up - and much, much worse - was part of the repertoire of the Nazis from the start. I mean, they were Nazis. Hitler already launched an armed, violent coup d'etat in 1923. They didn't start off with milkshakes and gently work their way up.

In that sense, no; but I just associate nazism with the feeling of not being able to escape and having them gradually ratchet up the violence until you submit.

Many people who died during nazi times weren't shipped off in trains to camps but rather just committed suicide because they saw no other way out.

Many things were sad about those times and the holocaust, but the idea of violence used to politically force and coerce people into submission is something everyone should be able to relate to as a terrible loss of political freedom.

I mean, how would you feel if people got so tired of being milkshaked or whatever other mild violence the left comes up with that they are no longer comfortable with holding an honest, independent political viewpoint? Do you really want people to abandon how they really think because they've been milkshaked into submission?

If not, what is the point of such milkshaking?
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 03:39 pm
@coldjoint,
People really need to start standing up to these leftists and start pressing both criminal and civil charges every time a leftist attacks them.

If these leftists start having to spend a couple weeks in jail and pay a dry-cleaning bill every time they assault someone, they will change their behavior pretty quickly.
livinglava
 
  -2  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 03:42 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

People really need to start standing up to these leftists and start pressing both criminal and civil charges every time a leftist attacks them.

If these leftists start having to spend a couple weeks in jail and pay a dry-cleaning bill every time they assault someone, they will change their behavior pretty quickly.

Or they will just claim that their political opponents are using the criminal justice system to oppress them into submission.

They don't believe in criminal justice neutrality. They only think of it as a tool of the oppressor. That's why they feel justified in fighting by whatever means to overthrow the government and replace it with one that serves them.

They aren't objective enough to realize that by doing so, they would become the oppressors; and that because they don't believe in neutrality, it would be impossible for them to rule fairly without discriminating against their political opponents by institutional means.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Tue 4 Jun, 2019 03:49 pm
@livinglava,
Quote:
without discriminating against their political opponents by institutional means.

That is what is being exposed about the Obama administration right now. Soon the facts will be overwhelming showing the crap he pulled that denying will make people look like fools, that is, more than usual.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.44 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 02:21:08