192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
blatham
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2019 06:02 am
A truly excellent piece by Neal Katyal who "drafted the special counsel regulations underwhich Robert Mueller was appointed" This is a must-read. Here is the final graph
Quote:
Mr. Barr’s deeply evasive testimony on Wednesday necessitates and tees up a full investigation in Congress. Those who say Congress shouldn’t do so because surveys show that the American public is not in favor of an impeachment inquiry must take into account the fact that the American people have been misled by Attorney General Barr’s characterizations of the report and its conclusions. These surveys are therefore not surprising. But there is no more sacred duty for Congress than getting to the bottom of whether our president has taken care that the laws of this country have been faithfully executed.
https://nyti.ms/2GXfDF8
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2019 06:11 am

Speaking of anxiety...
Although the term is bandied about a lot these days, there is no settled upon definition of a “constitutional crisis”, and it is not an actual legal term of art.

When someone uses the term these days, they’re generally trying to describe a situation where there is a conflict in the function of government that its political constitution and other governing laws and regulations can’t clearly resolve.

I think we’re in one now. The brazen way that Trump and his helpers are rejecting formal requests for testimony and documentation is not anything that we have precedent for. The impunity with which Trump is openly contemptuous of both other branches of our federal government is growing manifestly bolder with each day that passes with the Democrats alternately either vowing to take some definitive action against it, or advising us to settle it all “at the ballot box”.

If you’re still sanguine in the security that our system provides to keep us safe from an immoral, power-mad tyrant, I think you’re either not paying attention or you just don’t give a basic ****.

No one likes to admit being in fear. But seeing Barr sit there and smugly lie to the Senate and then tell them he just ain’t going to bother talking to the House; to hear and see the weak response...

Are the guardrails really as gone as they seem to be?

snood
 
  2  
Thu 2 May, 2019 06:23 am
When Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) said this to Barr’s face:

“Mr Barr, now the American people know that you are no different from Rudy Giuliani or Kellyanne Conway or any of the other people who sacrificed their once decent reputations for the grifter and liar who sits in the Oval Office.”

I became a fan.
blatham
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2019 06:27 am
@snood,
Quote:
Are the guardrails really as gone as they seem to be?
I wouldn't say "gone". But it is very close to that.

Increasingly, I have come to believe that the Dems must go on a total war-footing now. If not, there's no one to stop what's happening. Institutions are too weakened.
blatham
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2019 06:36 am
Radical Christian terrorism
Quote:
Alleged synagogue shooter espoused Christian theology, raising tough questions for evangelical pastors
https://wapo.st/2GYA2K1
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2019 06:37 am
@snood,
I hadn't heard that. Now I'm a fan as well.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Thu 2 May, 2019 07:07 am
@blatham,
You've mentioned Ahrendt on another thread.
By that, I was reminded at classes in school, where we read the letters exchanged between Ahrendt and Voegelin. (Arendt and Voegelin fundamentally disagree about what is the relation between the totalitarian phenomenon and religion. Arendt rejects entirely the concept of "political religion" invented by Voegelin.)
I really don't agree with most by Voegelin, but his ideas about "poitical religions" could shed light on today's religious right.
revelette1
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2019 09:22 am
@snood,
I had to be away for the last half of the Senate hearing, so I missed some of it. What I did catch was sort of breathtaking in Barr's obfuscating. He is no real Attorney General for the United States.
Lash
 
  -2  
Thu 2 May, 2019 09:23 am
@blatham,
The very fact that I sometimes do seem to defend Trump when I despise him ——and it gives you emptyheaded chuckleheads false ammunition to spread lies about me ——is ample proof that I care about honesty and equanimity of judgment.

I disagree with Bernie on occasion—and you and your bumbling crew of buffoons immediately say that my disagreement is proof I’m a Trump fan.

You can’t have it both ways.

smh
Lash
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2019 09:24 am
@hightor,
Reminds me of people who support Wikileaks and whistleblowers because they like knowing THE TRUTH.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  3  
Thu 2 May, 2019 09:26 am
Mar-a-Lago sent White House a $1,000 liquor bill after aides helped themselves to bar: report

Probably a drop in the bucket to the tab to tax payers over the years.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2019 09:45 am
The knock on effect of having a president with an election slogan of 'Grab them by the pussy.'

Quote:
The US military has reported a major spike in sexual assaults despite years of efforts to address the problem.

Figures show 20,500 instances of unwanted sexual contact occurred in 2018, up from 14,900 in 2016 which is the last time a survey was conducted.

Alcohol was involved in one third of cases, and most victims were female recruits ages 17 to 24.

Acting Defence Secretary Patrick Shanahan has told Congress he plans to "criminalise" military sex harassment.

What does the report show?The report released on Thursday surveyed the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines, and found 20,500 cases in 2018.

Incidents of unwanted sexual contact - which ranges from groping to rape - rose by around 38% between 2016 and 2018.

Only one out of three cases were reported to authorities, the report found.

In more than 85% of cases, victims knew their attacker. The majority of cases involved young women whose attacker was often a superior officer.

The report should be "a trip wire", said Nate Galbreath, Deputy Director of the Department' of Defense's Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office.

"This is what tells us that there's something going on that we need to hone in on," he told ABC News.

"We've got a higher prevalence for women 17 to 24. We're going to be focusing very, very tightly on that."

Congresswoman Jackie Speier, who chairs the House Armed Services Committee's personnel panel, told the USA Today newspaper that the military "must accept that current programmes are simply not working".

"Congress must lead the way in forcing the department to take more aggressive approaches to fighting this scourge," she said, calling for intervention from US lawmakers.

On Thursday, Mr Shanahan revealed some of the recommendations made by the Sexual Assault Accountability and Investigation Task Force, which was created last month after the urging of Senator Martha McSally.

Senator McSally, who was the first female US fighter pilot to fly in combat, revealed in March that she had been raped by a superior officer while serving in the Air Force.

In response to the report, Mr Shanahan directed the US Department of Defence "criminalise" sexual harassment "to combat this scourge".

It is unclear if he would need congressional approval to make changes to the Uniform Code of Military Justice - the US military's legal code, to make the offence a "stand-alone crime".

In a memo on Thursday announcing the change, Mr Shanahan also announced plans to train commanders in a new programme to uncover serial sex offenders.

"To put it bluntly, we are not performing to the standards and expectations we have for ourselves or for each other," Mr Shanahan said.

"This is unacceptable. We cannot shrink from facing the challenge head on."


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-48125906
NSFW (view)
Olivier5
 
  2  
Thu 2 May, 2019 10:05 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Interesting. I must admit some tropism to Ahrendt's view as expressed in your post, always found somewhat superficial the idea that nazism or communism are political religions.
0 Replies
 
Real Music
 
  4  
Thu 2 May, 2019 10:27 am
@Lash,
Quote:
The very fact that I sometimes do seem to defend Trump when I despise him

From your history of postings, I am left with the impression that you despise Hillary Clinton.

1. Do you sometimes defend Hillary Clinton in the same manner that you sometimes defend Donald Trump?

2. How often have you defended Joe Biden?




I don't know the answer to these questions. I'm just curious.
blatham
 
  1  
Thu 2 May, 2019 11:34 am
@Walter Hinteler,
I have to confess that Voegelin is a name with which I'm not familiar at all. I'm going to see what I can find in English re translations of these letters as I'm extremely interested in the two phenomena and their relationship. Thank you!
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Thu 2 May, 2019 11:38 am
Quote:
US Speaker Nancy Pelosi has accused the Attorney General William Barr of lying to Congress.

Her comments came a day after Mr Barr's testimony to a Senate panel about Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report on Russia's alleged meddling in 2016.

Mr Barr faced sharp questioning about his decision to clear President Donald Trump of obstruction of justice.

The top US law official refused to testify to Democratic-led House Judiciary Committee on Thursday.

The standoff raises the prospect that Mr Barr - America's top legal official - could be held in contempt of Congress.

"He lied to Congress. And if anybody else did that it would be considered a crime," Ms Pelosi said on Thursday.

"Nobody is above the law," she added.

Ms Pelosi's accusation stems from Mr Barr saying he was not aware of any complaints Mr Mueller had about the Attorney General's four-page summary of his report.

Mr Mueller wrote a letter to Mr Barr saying the summary lacked "context".

"It wasn't about technicalities," Ms Pelosi told reporters. "The attorney general of the United States of America was not telling the truth to the Congress of the United States. That's a crime."

But a spokeswoman for the Department of Justice hit back at Ms Pelosi after her comments.

"The baseless attack on the Attorney General is reckless, irresponsible and false," spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-48138433
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Thu 2 May, 2019 11:45 am
@izzythepush,
These are the same people who had no problem with the AG Lynch having a secret meeting on a plane with the husband of someone under investigation... These Dems have zero claims of anything dealing with AG's.
blatham
 
  3  
Thu 2 May, 2019 11:53 am
@Real Music,
You do point to a rather glaring discrepancy.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Thu 2 May, 2019 11:56 am
@Real Music,
From what I've watched over the last few years, Lash is a Bernie voter and never supported Hillary Clinton.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.48 seconds on 07/15/2025 at 02:48:59