monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

The chances of his defenders taking an honest look at the unredacted parts of the report was always even more slim.

The day after President Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, then-deputy press secretary Sarah Sanders stood at the podium in the White House briefing room and told reporters that the president had had “countless conversations” with members of the FBI who said morale at the bureau was low and they had lost confidence in Comey.

“He’s questioned Director Comey’s reason for needing to stay at the FBI,” Sanders said during the May 10, 2017, briefing. “He had countless conversations with members from within the FBI.”

But in her testimony to federal investigators probing whether Trump obstructed justice, Sanders admitted that she made it up.

According to special counsel Robert Mueller's report on the Trump campaign's contacts with Russia and the president’s interference in the investigation released Thursday, there was “no evidence” suggesting Trump had heard from FBI agents who had lost confidence in Comey before his firing, and “Sanders acknowledged to investigators that her comments were not founded on anything.”

Given the many other investigations on-going, I don't see how Trump survives this. As with this op/ed above, right wing media will continue continue to portray Trump as a fine fellow and great American who's being victimized by political enemies. But as his polling numbers drop and electoral dangers increase for the GOP, the party is going to face some very complicated problems. How sad for them.

So if a person seeking a hitman, ask someone who refuses to do murder for him/her, does that mean the person wanting murder done is off the hook?

The chances of his defenders taking an honest look at the unredacted parts of the report was always even more slim.

You really need a new shtick.

Of course you will not concede to obstruction even when it's staring you in the face.

Your bigotry towards Clinton keeps you hindered

and willfully ignorant.

Telling an official to close down an ongoing investigation to conceal a crime IS obstruction.

Clinton WAS impeached. So, no, it's NOT ok. Maybe for you, but not for most Americans.

Again, the report wasn't to INDICT a sitting president, it was to gather FACTS.

We now have the facts, it's been turned over to Congress. Let them do their job and bring Articles of Impeachment forward.

No. I need to continue pointing out facts and reality.

Sure I would. I would love to be staring at obstruction so I could throw Bill Clinton's multiple counts of obstruction and conspiracy to obstruct in the Democrats' faces.

But facts are facts. And the fact is, Trump did not commit obstruction.

I'm still doing my best to raise Bill Clinton as a secondary point however..

There is another point that needs to be raised as well, that I forgot to bring up in my previous posts. These Democratic witch hunts have a history of fabricating obstruction charges against innocent people. There is no reason to believe that anything in the Mueller report is actually true.

There are so many different reasons for ignoring the Mueller report that it is hard to keep track of them all.

That's silly. Pointing out the fact that Bill Clinton committed multiple counts of obstruction and conspiracy to obstruct is hardly bigotry.

I realize that you had nothing to counter this fact with, but come on.

Feel free to try to point out any untrue statements that I've made.

I doubt it. But that isn't what happened here in any case.

What happened here is the official himself deciding to close down the investigation.

The Democrats let Bill Clinton off the hook and refused to remove him from office.

That is incorrect. The only job of the Special Counsel is to prosecute crimes.

It is not their job to impeach innocent officials on imaginary charges.

If the Democrats try to do such a thing, we should outlaw the Democratic Party in America and be rid of their witch hunts once and for all.