monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

@farmerman,

Quote:

does pinky ever sleep? Is he a bot?

Between 6 and 7 hrs a day.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

Quote:

Re: coldjoint (Post 6818407)
does pinky ever sleep? Is he a bot?

This is my sidekick you are talking about. His dutiful task is to follow me about 24 hours per day to serve as required. And let me tell you, my boots have never shined like this before.

3 Replies

Most Republicans don’t accept a basic Mueller finding: That Russia tried to interfere in the 2016 election

Quote:

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]
It again raises an important question: What if Mueller had demonstrated serious wrongdoing by Trump? What if the full report still does? Then what?

It’s an important question, but the answer seems obvious. If Republicans accept Trump’s argument on Russian interference despite the scads of evidence to the contrary, it seems likely that they’d accept his argument about alleged wrongdoing, too.

3 Replies

@blatham,

I admire your integrity.

2 Replies

@blatham,

I think you're confusing having a sidekick with a shitweasel infestation.

3 Replies

@Walter Hinteler,

Quote:

What if Mueller had demonstrated serious wrongdoing by Trump?

Serious wrongdoing would be chargeable, don't you think? A ridiculous speculation and more outright desperation.

0 Replies

@glitterbag,

Quote:

I admire your integrity.

He has no integrity and he has proven that, and you saying that shows you have none either. Period.

0 Replies

@blatham,

Quote:

This is my sidekick you are talking about. His dutiful task is to follow me about 24 hours per day to serve as required.

You go ahead and keep lying nothing else is expected from you.

0 Replies

@izzythepush,

You have introduced me to a new phrase, thank you!!!! Hahahahahahahahahaha

1 Reply

@glitterbag,

It just came to me. I have a muse.

0 Replies

@Walter Hinteler,

Quote:

It again raises an important question: What if Mueller had demonstrated serious wrongdoing by Trump?

Then the precedent that the Democrats set with Bill Clinton would mean letting Trump get away with it.

Quote:

What if the full report still does? Then what?

It doesn't.

2 Replies

@izzythepush,

Quote:

a shitweasel infestation.

You have me confused with your Labour Party.

0 Replies

@oralloy,

oralloy wrote:

Quote:
What if the full report still does? Then what?

It doesn't.

You belong to those few, who have read it Shocked

2 Replies

Quote:

Bill Barr’s ” PRETTY UPSET” about the handling of Clinton probe

Quote:

Uh Oh, Jim Comey!

Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina said Attorney General William Barr is “pretty upset” with how the FBI handled the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s unauthorized private email server.

During an interview on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures,” Graham, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he hopes Barr will appoint a special counsel to look into potential political bias.

“So it seems to me that she was interviewed not under oath. She had a couple of her staff people with her. People in her campaign were given immunity without anything in return. Nobody in the Clinton investigation went to jail for lying about the process because there was no process,” Graham told host Maria Bartiromo.

Remember Trump is the boss. I do not think he will stop Barr from pursuing justice and punishing the real criminals in this 3 year scheme to overturn a legitimate election.
https://www.independentsentinel.com/bill-barrs-pretty-upset-about-the-handling-of-clinton-probe/

0 Replies

@Walter Hinteler,

Quote:

You belong to those few, who have read it

Is his speculation any different than yours? Have you read the report?

0 Replies

@oralloy,

Thats not the way the jusrice system works. It resets to zero each time. Most of the case against clinton is gop propaganda. What isnt has no bearing on trumps guilt.

2 Replies

@MontereyJack,

Quote:

Most of the case against clinton is gop propaganda.

I see, she did not acid wash her emails? She did not have devices destroyed? She was not under oath when interviewed? Her associates did not receive immunity?

None of that is propaganda, it is the plain old truth. I hope they send her fat drunken ass to jail.

0 Replies

@Walter Hinteler,

Walter Hinteler wrote:

You belong to those few, who have read it

I could tell more than a year ago that there was no collusion. It stands to reason therefore that there would not be any collusion found by the investigation.

Moreover, an official summary of the report has been released. I can also tell that the report finds no major wrongdoing by Trump from the fact that the official summary says so.

0 Replies

@Walter Hinteler,

Quote:

If Republicans accept Trump’s argument on Russian interference despite the scads of evidence to the contrary, it seems likely that they’d accept his argument about alleged wrongdoing, too.

Certain, I'd wager. That is precisely the purpose of the right wing media machine in this matter. Authoritarian types do love a state propaganda system and the US now has one. What the graphs demonstrate is how effective it is.

1 Reply

@glitterbag,

Quote:

Re: blatham (Post 6818433)
I admire your integrity.

Thank you. I recognize that I am special in this regard.

1 Reply

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know