192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Lash
 
  1  
Mon 25 Mar, 2019 03:09 pm
@Builder,
I’ve been waiting a long time for this investigation.
coldjoint
 
  1  
Mon 25 Mar, 2019 03:21 pm
@Lash,
Quote:
I’ve been waiting a long time for this investigation.

You have never been alone. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  1  
Mon 25 Mar, 2019 03:46 pm
Quote:
BREAKING! Michael Avenatti FEDERALLY charged!!

Presidential pardon? Notice some people don't do to good when they take on Trump. I wonder if others will suffer from more scrutiny.
https://therightscoop.com/breaking-michael-avenatti-federally-charged/
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Mon 25 Mar, 2019 05:59 pm
Quote:
Now it is Obama's turn

Quote:
Mueller cleared President Trump.

Now it is Obama's turn to face the music.

We can start by squeezing the little finks like Lisa Page and Peter Strzok until they squeal, and then go up the ladder -- Susan Rice, Jimmy Clapper, John Brennan -- until we finally get Mister Big.

And afterward, President Trump can file a RICO lawsuit against the Clintons, the Obamas and the DNC. Bankrupt them.

They tried to fundamentally transform America into a banana republic without the bananas. There is a price to pay for such ambitions that we must extract for the sake of the Republic.

https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2019/03/now-it-is-obamas-turn.html?spref=tw
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Mon 25 Mar, 2019 07:52 pm
https://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/gv032319dAPR20190323064510.jpg
https://townhall.com/political-cartoons/2019/03/23/164304
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Mon 25 Mar, 2019 07:57 pm
https://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/stg032019dAPR20190320044509.jpg
https://townhall.com/political-cartoons/2019/03/20/164210
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Mon 25 Mar, 2019 08:15 pm
CBS is Telling fairy tales about the Mueller Report right now. I have not heard one word about the dossier Clinton paid for yet.
Builder
 
  0  
Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:00 pm
@coldjoint,
As I mentioned waaaaay back an Australian diplomatic envoy was neck deep in that dossier as well. It's deep. Might need to dig it all up.
coldjoint
 
  1  
Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:05 pm
@Builder,
Quote:
As I mentioned waaaaay back an Australian diplomatic envoy was neck deep in that dossier as well.

Notice how quiet it is after Trump turns out to be an American. Yeah, I remember, he helped set people up.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  1  
Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:13 pm
Quote:
Senator Rand Paul
‏Verified account @RandPaul

Time to investigate the Obama officials who concocted and spread the Russian conspiracy hoax!

As they say in the UK, that is a "banner" idea.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/03/25/wsj-time-for-obama-admin-to-account-for-historic-abuse-of-government-surveillance-powers/
0 Replies
 
neptuneblue
 
  2  
Mon 25 Mar, 2019 10:50 pm
What's there to hide? A "summary" doesn't cut it.

Mitch McConnell Blocks Resolution to Release Full Mueller Report

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell blocked a non-binding resolution calling on Attorney General William Barr to release the full Mueller report, Axios reported Monday. The bill passed unanimously in the House and was backed publicly by many prominent Democrats. And while President Trump said releasing the full report, which was delivered to Barr this weekend, “wouldn’t bother me at all,” McConnell argued that publicizing the report in its entirety could raise security issues. Barr’s four-page summary of the report has been released publicly, but Democrats argue that it’s necessary to view the document in its entirety
Builder
 
  -2  
Tue 26 Mar, 2019 03:03 am
@Lash,
Quote:
I’ve been waiting a long time for this investigation.


The evidence of Clinton's input with the fake "dossier" has been on the table from the get-go, so either Mueller is complicit in that series of shenanigans, or he's not wanting to expose the real story.

It goes a whole lot deeper than most would be willing to delve. Kind of a national cognitive dissonance, involving the DOJ, FBI, and likely the CIA.

Very bloody deep (state).
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  0  
Tue 26 Mar, 2019 03:10 am
@neptuneblue,
Quote:
What's there to hide? A "summary" doesn't cut it.


Yes, I fully agree. 30 million on a two-year circus act, for what outcome?

hightor
 
  2  
Tue 26 Mar, 2019 05:34 am
@Builder,
Quote:
30 million on a two-year circus act, for what outcome?

The $30 million investigation was run professionally and detailed the extent of Russian involvement in the '16 election, leading to a number of indictments of Russian operatives, and unrelated indictments and some convictions for other crimes discovered in the process. I wouldn't characterize it as a "circus". It also discovered no direct cooperation between the Trump campaign and the Russian attempts to influence the contest. Mueller shouldn't be blamed for all the speculation raised by figures in the media or conjectures put forward by opposition politicians.
hightor
 
  3  
Tue 26 Mar, 2019 05:37 am
Coal plants emitted more than ever in 2018, putting Earth in ‘deep trouble’

Quote:
Global energy experts released grim findings Monday, saying that not only are planet-warming carbon-dioxide emissions still increasing, but the world's growing thirst for energy has led to higher emissions from coal-fired power plants than ever before.

Energy demand around the world grew by 2.3 percent over the past year, marking the most rapid increase in a decade, according to the report from the International Energy Agency. To meet that demand, largely fueled by a booming economy, countries turned to an array of sources, including renewables.

But nothing filled the void quite like fossil fuels, which went toward nearly 70 percent of the skyrocketing electricity demand, according to the agency, which analyzes energy trends on behalf of 30 member countries, including the United States.

In particular, a fleet of relatively new coal plants located in Asia, with decades to go on their lifetimes, led the way toward a record for emissions from coal-fired power plants - exceeding 10 billion tons of carbon dioxide "for the first time," the agency said. In Asia, "average plants are only 12 years old, decades younger than their average economic lifetime of around 40 years," the agency found.

As a result, greenhouse-gas emissions from the use of energy - by far their largest source - surged in 2018, reaching an record high of 33.1 billion tons. Emissions showed 1.7 percent growth, well-above the average since 2010. The growth in global emissions in 2018 alone was "equivalent to the total emissions from international aviation," the body found.

Monday's report underscores an unnerving truth about the world's collective efforts to stop climate change: Even as renewable energy rapidly expands, many countries - including the United States and China - are nevertheless still turning to fossil fuels to satisfy ever-growing energy demand.

"Very worrisome" is how Michael Mehling, deputy director of the Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, described Monday's findings.

"To me, all this reflects the fact that climate policies around the globe, despite some limited pockets of progress, remain woefully inadequate," he said in an email. "They're not even robust enough to offset the increased emissions from economic expansion, especially in the developing world, let alone to spur decarbonization at levels commensurate with the temperature stabilization goals we've committed to under the Paris Agreement."

Mehling questioned whether the Paris climate agreement - the 2015 global accord in which countries vowed to slash their carbon emissions - has the capacity to compel nations to live up to their promises and ramp up climate action over time.

"This will require overcoming the persistent barriers that have prevented greater progress in the past," Mehling said.

Overcoming those barriers is complicated, as the agency report makes clear.

China, for instance, satisfied a demand for more energy last year with some new generation from renewables. But it relied far more on natural gas, coal and oil. In India, about half of all new demand was similarly met by coal-fired power plants.

In the United States, by contrast, coal is declining - but most of the increase in demand for energy in this country was fueled by the burning of natural gas, rather than renewable energy. Natural gas emits less carbon dioxide than coal does when it is burned, but it's still a fossil fuel and still causes significant emissions.

There's some slight good news in the new report: As renewables and natural gas have grown, coal has a smaller share of the energy use.

Yet the fact that it's still growing strongly contradicts what scientists have said about what's needed to curb global warming. In a major report last year the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found that global emissions would have to be cut nearly in half by 2030 to preserve a chance of holding the planet's warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit).

That would require extremely fast annual reductions in emissions - but instead, the world is marking record highs.

And when it comes to coal use, that same report found that to limit temperatures to 1.5 degrees Celsius, it would have to decline by as much as 78 percent in just over 10 years.

Rob Jackson, a professor of Earth system science at Stanford University, said the substantial growth of wind and solar energy detailed in Monday's report was overshadowed by the world's ongoing reliance on fossil fuels.

"The growth in fossils is still greater than all the increases in renewables," Jackson said, adding that few countries are living up to the pledges they made as part of the Paris climate accord. "What's discouraging is that emissions in the U.S. and Europe are going up, too. Someone has to decrease their emissions significantly for us to have any hope of meeting the Paris commitments."

The new results dash earlier hopes that global emissions might be flattening and starting to decline. From 2014 through 2016, they fell slightly, and coal emissions dipped. But with a renewal of growth in 2017 and record highs in 2018, turning the corner on emissions remains nowhere in sight.

As a result, optimism from earlier this decade has largely faded. International efforts to combat climate change have struggled to maintain momentum, and the U.S. government has undergone a reversal of priorities.

“We are in deep trouble,” Jackson said of Monday’s findings. “The climate consequences are catastrophic. I don’t use any word like that very often. But we are headed for disaster, and nobody seems to be able to slow things down.”

nola
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  3  
Tue 26 Mar, 2019 06:24 am
@hightor,
Not to mention the fact that the Mueller investigation paid for itself with the confiscation of tax cheat Pail Manaforts homes and belongings and bank accounts.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Tue 26 Mar, 2019 07:55 am
To watch:
Quote:
Opinion: The Supreme Court Has A Chance To Push Back On Gerrymandering Today
In the past, Chief Justice John Roberts has ruled the First Amendment forbids the government from favoring some voters over others. Will he stick by his words?
Link
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  0  
Tue 26 Mar, 2019 08:03 am
Quote:
The Trump administration wants all of Obamacare overturned by the courts
DOJ is escalating its legal assault against the health care law, arguing the whole statute is unconstitutional.
Vox

It would be a fine idea to let everyone you know in on what's in store for them and their families if Republicans get this done. And you can mention Roe v Wade while you're at it.
revelette1
 
  1  
Tue 26 Mar, 2019 08:21 am
@blatham,
Well, that news sucks. I may as well be prepared to die. I am beginning to hate this country under Trump. All I can hope for is that Roberts and a few others conservative Justices will vote against Trump's case whatever it is concerning Obamacare.

And this AG is the guy we are supposed to trust to summarize the Mueller report?
blatham
 
  3  
Tue 26 Mar, 2019 08:34 am
@revelette1,
The result is not certain, of course. Kennedy voted with the conservatives (other than Roberts) so his replacement doesn't change that equation. Still, the right is dead-set on killing this program (or any others that might demonstrate to citizens that government can makes citizens' lives much improved) because that seriously damages their central belief (or pretended belief) that government is the problem. Electoral victory is critically important for all who don't hate government. Trump cannot be allowed to win again or the US will be truly fucked, likely never to recover.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.44 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 10:15:50