192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
blatham
 
  1  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 09:28 am
Draining The Swamp - episode 459
Quote:
U.S. banks raked in record profits thanks to GOP tax bill
New FDIC data further proves Wall Street has gained the most from the bill.
TP
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  -1  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 09:39 am
@oralloy,
At least a couple of the things I've read about the Assange case is that the Swedish government was under pressure from Washington to charge the guy with something and get him out of circulation and that the Swedish government, left to its own devices, would not have charged him.

Most people picture rape as some girl or woman walking down the sidewalk or through the woods and then getting nabbed and forcibly taken by somebody they don't even know. What you're describing is more like a case of a hot date that didn't go according to script or something.
gungasnake
 
  -2  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 09:46 am
@hightor,
Quote:
Read much?


In fact I do. At least enough to comprehend what Robert Mueller is about....

https://gohmert.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398634

https://www.scribd.com/document/377409983/Gohmert-Mueller-UNMASKED

Quote:


1
ROBERT MUELLER: UNMASKED

by Congressman Louie Gohmert

Robert Mueller has a long and sordid history of illicitly targeting innocent people that is a stain upon the legacy of American jurisprudence. He lacks the judgment and credibility to lead the prosecution of anyone.

I do not make these statements lightly. Each time I prepared to question Mueller during Congressional hearings, the more concerned I became about his work ethic. Then as I went back to begin compiling all that information in order to recount personal interactions with Mueller, the more clearly the big picture began to come into focus. At one point I had to make the decision to stop adding to this or it would turn into a far too lengthy project. My goal was to share some first-hand information as other Republican Members of Congress had requested, adding, “You seem to know so much about him.” This article is prepared from my viewpoint to help better inform the reader about the Special Prosecutor leading the effort to railroad President Donald J. Trump through whatever manufactured charge he can allege. Judging by Mueller's history, it doesn't matter who he has to threaten, harass, prosecute or bankrupt to get someone to be willing to allege something

anything

about our current President, it certainly appears Mueller will do what it takes to bring down his target, ethically, or unethically, based on my findings. What does former Attorney General Eric Holder say? Sounds like much the same thing
I just said. Holder: “I’ve known Bob Mueller for 20, 30 years; my guess is he’s just trying to make the case as good as he possibly can.” Holder does know him. He has seen
Mueller at work when Holder was obstructing justice and acting in contempt of
Congress. He knows Mueller’s FBI framed innocent people and had no remorse in doing so. Let’s look at what we know.
What I have accumulated here is absolutely shocking upon the realization that Mueller's disreputable, twisted history speaks to the character of the man placed in a position to attempt to legalize a coup against a lawfully-elected President......

oralloy
 
  -1  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 10:09 am
@gungasnake,
gungasnake wrote:
At least a couple of the things I've read about the Assange case is that the Swedish government was under pressure from Washington to charge the guy with something and get him out of circulation and that the Swedish government, left to its own devices, would not have charged him.
The US didn't make these women say that they were raped.

gungasnake wrote:
Most people picture rape as some girl or woman walking down the sidewalk or through the woods and then getting nabbed and forcibly taken by somebody they don't even know. What you're describing is more like a case of a hot date that didn't go according to script or something.
It's still sex without consent.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 12:57 pm
Quote:
Jussie Smollett Wasn't Assaulted by a Conservative, but a Berkeley Conservative was Assaulted by a Leftist

Did anyone hear about this on the networks? This is hate and political violence. This is the Left.
https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/272955/jussie-smollett-wasnt-assaulted-conservative-daniel-greenfield#.XHAtwnBa_z4.twitter
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 01:06 pm
Quote:
Advocate Mag Editor Suggests Pro-Trump Police Rigged Investigation to Harm Smollett

Laughing Laughing Laughing
Pro Trump police in Chicago? The city that would not let Trump have a rally during his campaign? WTF.
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/02/22/advocate-mag-editor-suggests-pro-trump-police-rigged-investigation-to-harm-smollet/
blatham
 
  2  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 01:33 pm
A reader over at TPM has raised a very interesting (and compelling) suggestion re whether we'll see the Mueller report or not.
Quote:
But what I was struck by this evening was the question of what happens if it goes the other way? What if, despite the suspicions of many of us, Mueller concludes that there really *wasn’t* any coordination or attempted coordination between the institutional Trump Campaign and Russia (and perhaps that Manafort was essentially freelancing for his own benefit)?

In that case, wouldn’t we expect the WH position to be that they would *want* the report released in its entirety? After all, the President appears to care much more about personal vindication than anything else, even if it means throwing some other “uncharged individual’ lower down on the totem pole under the bus
a bit. (Or even ignoring what may be real national security equities in keeping portions of the report secret, as with the Nunes Memo.) And even making the somewhat unrealistic assumption that the President manages not to expressly communicate that desire to the AG, it would have to be blazingly obvious to the AG on his own.

But if that’s true, then it seems like there’s an implicit tell. If the report isn’t released (or immediately leaked), it’s presumably because there’s *something* derogatory about the President or his closest associates. The alternative, that the AG has decided to take a stand on principle, against the President’s wishes, when the substantive result of the Mueller investigation is to clear the President just seems too unrealistic to credit.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 01:36 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
that the AG has decided to take a stand on principle,

Standing on principle leaves the Left out, they have demonstrated they lack principle, character, and concern for the citizens of their country.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 01:37 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Pro Trump police in Chicago? The city that would not let Trump have a rally during his campaign? WTF.

I'm not commenting on the Breitbart story. But I would suggest to you that there are very likely lots of pro-Trump cops in the Chicago police department. Law enforcement personnel are commonly more politically conservative than the people elected to public office in big cities. The story could be bogus but not necessarily because of the point you're trying to make here.
Brand X
 
  2  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 01:37 pm
@coldjoint,
Smollett just became the biggest Patriots fan.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 01:45 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
commonly more politically conservative than the people elected to public office in big cities.

Go ahead and prove that. And what do their political views have to do with their job? Is everyone on the Right a political activist, I don't think so.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 01:46 pm
Quote:
Five stabbing attacks in Germany on the same day

Do we need more Islam, Germany sure as Hell does not.
https://voiceofeurope.com/2019/02/five-stabbing-attacks-in-germany-on-the-same-day/
0 Replies
 
NSFW (view)
neptuneblue
 
  2  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 01:55 pm
@gungasnake,
THIS GUY??? Lol!!!

Louie Gohmert

Gohmert's heavily-Photoshopped official portrait.

“”People have said to me, ‘Stephen you gotta understand, you don’t even know your history. You’re dumb. You’re dense. You’re a mental midget with the IQ of a butter dish whose mind is a black hole that sucks all surrounding thought into it in an infinite singularity of pure stupidity. Stephen I’m surprised you can even dress yourself. I bet you have to rub peanut butter inside your lips to remember to open your mouth to breathe. I have never met, and I hope to never meet again, a man so pervasively astoundingly unyieldingly ignorant.’ To which I say, 'well then you haven’t met Louie Gohmert.'

—Stephen Colbert[1]

Louis Buller "Louie" Gohmert, Jr. (born 1953) is a Republican Representative from Texas (first elected in 2004) and an accomplished idiot. He continues Texas' long, well-deserved reputation of electing eminently stupid people to federal office. He survives by hewing as far right as he can go in an already right-wing state, including jumping on the birther train in 2009[2] and the Tea Party movement in 2010.[3] Despite getting elected year after year, as a representative, nothing he says accomplishes anything beyond wasting time, his proposed bills go nowhere, and his role on every House committee is to be a big dumb waste of space.

However, he's tolerated by the Tea Party movement[4] because he's a reliable supporter of whatever their political position du jour is, including opposing Obamacare,[5] taxes,[6][7] gun control,[8] the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell,[9] and the American Jobs Act stimulus bill.[10]

What makes Gohmert remarkable isn't his run-of-the-mill Tea Party positions, but rather, that he defends them with alarmist non-sequiturs: Jesus hates taxes![7] Gun control will lead to bestiality![8] The American Jobs Act is an attack on marriage![10] Obama talking to BP about the 2010 oil spill is just like Hitler![11] Foreign aid to China will lead them to sell us food with cats and dogs in it![12] Oil pipelines are good for wildlife![13] Hate crimes legislation leads to necrophilia![14] Etc. Etc.

Believe it or not, Gohmert used to be a judge. In 2003, he defeated the four-term incumbent, Max Sandlin, in an electoral wipeout—thanks to the new Texas redistricting laws. Gohmert's only comeback for each question in the debate was Well my opponent likes JOHN KERRY... I mean, ha ha ha. He was a douchebag even then.

Terror babies
Gohmert frequently makes what are almost certainly off-the-cuff (albeit dumb) remarks, and when called on them, defends them to the death rather than admit he was wrong.

The best example of this is the "terror babies." Gohmert repeatedly claimed that terrorists were impregnating women, sending them to the US, waiting for the babies to be born as "anchor babies," flying them back to wherever they came from, waiting twenty to thirty years so the babies can grow up and be trained as terrorists, and then sending them back to the US where they can gain easy entry to blow up the country. He first introduced this idea in a speech on the House floor in 2010.

In response, CNN anchor Anderson Cooper interviewed an FBI official on his show to debunk the terror babies claim (Gohmert asserted that the FBI had reported terror baby incidents). Gohmert then appeared on Cooper's show and refused to provide any evidence of terror babies.[15] Xenophobic think tank Center for Immigration Studies attempted to back him up with a report on terror babies, but provided no evidence except for some statistics on illegal immigration and conspiratorial insinuations.[16]

Xenophobic synergy
In a speech delivered to a Longview Chamber of Commerce in Texas, Gohmert voiced his fears that "Radical Islamists" were infiltrating the United States by impersonating Latinos.[17]

Anti-semitism
Apropos of nothing, Gohmert made the following completely false accusations during a Fox Business Network interview, "George Soros is supposed to be Jewish, but you wouldn't know it from the damage he's inflicted on Israel, and the fact that he turned on fellow Jews and helped take the property that they owned. It's the same kind of thing." Gohmert's office doubled down on this slander by subsequently releasing this false statement, "Soros himself admitted in a 60 Minutes interview with Steve Kroft on December 20, 1998, that he had no regrets whatsoever about assisting the Nazis in confiscating property from the Jewish people during the Holocaust. That is a fact."[18]

Same-sex marriage
Gohmert links marriage equality to bestiality and polygamy, gay Boy Scouts to pedophilia, and hate-crimes laws to the end of religious freedom.[19]

Finding terrorists in the tea leaves
Not content to simply insult millions of marginalized people of a darker hue than he, Gohmert also suggested the very respectable, very white senior Senator from Arizona John McCain was a terrorist.[20]

Anti-vaccine quackery
He takes a different line of insanity on the issue than fellow weirdos travelers like Jenny McCarthy or Michele Bachmann; he's opposed to them because liberal elites are culling the Earth's human population through their use in order to preserve natural resources, not because of any false safety concerns drummed up by anti-vax shills. According to Gohmert, this conspiracy is aiming for a target human population of around 700 million people, which would constitute less than ten percent of the estimated current human population.[21]

On school shootings
According to Louie Gohmert, the principal of Sandy Hook should have "had an M4 in her office, locked up so when she heard gunfire, she pulls it out …and takes him out and takes his head off before he can kill those precious kids."[22]

Diplomatic overtures of note
He went to Egypt in September 2013 as part of a Congressional package deal including the likes of Michele Bachmann and Steve King in order to laud the military government for its overthrow of Mohamed Morsi. He wasn't responsible for implying that the Muslim Brotherhood was responsible for 9/11 (that was Bachmann), but he did make the singularly weird comparison of General Abdel Fatah el-Sissi to George Washington.[23]

US History 101
Gohmert disingenuously welcomed the probe into Russian hackers trying to help out the electoral chances of Donald Trump in 2016, but for an odd reason: so that it would also shed light on similar Soviet intervention in the elections of Harry S. Truman, John F. Kennedy and Jimmy Carter.[24] Like the other singularly odd statements he's made on a regular basis in the past, he was apparently quite serious.

The word "stupid" might not be strong enough, here
“”I think the biggest blockbuster out of (Trump’s) press conference with Putin was Putin disclosing that they have evidence that the U.S. intelligence community provided over $400 million to Hillary Clinton for her campaign.
—Louie Gohmert on CBN[25]
According to Gohmert, our good buddies in Russia have “solid evidence that some intelligence officers accompanied and guided these transactions.” The only problem with that assertion is that it's based solely on the word of autocratic sociopath Russian President Vladimir Putin.[26] But he would never lie to anyone for political gain, right?
gungasnake
 
  -1  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 02:05 pm
@neptuneblue,
More bullshit from rationalwiki... Professional skeptics like that are basically claiming to be omniscient and in real life, the only guy in the universe with any halfway valid claim like that is God.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 02:06 pm
@neptuneblue,
Quote:
Louie Gohmert

Who cares?
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 02:09 pm
https://www.theepochtimes.com/assets/uploads/2019/02/22/US-Mexico-border-fence-Tijuana.jpg
Here is the wall the MSM is saying is not getting built.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/30-foot-border-wall-begins-construction-in-california_2810988.html
hightor
 
  1  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 02:29 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Go ahead and prove that.

It's common sense. Their job is to enforce the law, which is a system to protect the existing economic, social, and ideological structure. For christ's sake, for years the right has been accusing liberals of being pro-criminal defenders of drug dealers and cop killers. How many cops do you see marching under a "Black Lives Matter" banner?
Quote:
About three-quarters of Republicans say that police around the country are doing an excellent or good job when it comes to treating racial and ethnic groups equally, using the right amount of force for each situation and holding officers accountable when misconduct occurs. Only about a quarter of Democrats agree.

pewresearch

Cops are much more likely to support the groups they believe to support them, if you know what I mean.

Ask a street cop if there are any liberals in their department and they'll answer, "Yeah, we call them "Captain" or "Chief".
coldjoint
 
  0  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 02:35 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
liberals of being pro-criminal defenders of drug dealers and cop killers.

That is true. Anything else?
neptuneblue
 
  2  
Fri 22 Feb, 2019 02:37 pm
@coldjoint,
At LEAST be ACCURATE....

30-foot Border Wall Begins Construction In California
BY THE DAILY CALLER
February 21, 2019 Updated: February 21, 2019 Share

Several days after President Donald Trump declared a national emergency, construction began on the fifth border wall project of his administration.

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection announced Tuesday that work has started on replacing 14 miles of a steel-mesh fence along the U.S.-Mexico border near San Diego, The Associated Press reported. The fence is being replaced with 30-foot high steel bollards. It is actually the second layer of barrier to be put up in the area, with the first layer nearly complete.

SLSCO Ltd., a company located in Galveston, Texas, scored the $101 million contract in December 2018. The Trump administration has already awarded around $1 billion in contracts to cover 97 miles of the southern border, with the project in San Diego being one of the latest.

Trump touted the construction Wednesday of a border wall in New Mexico.

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
We have just built this powerful Wall in New Mexico. Completed on January 30, 2019 – 47 days ahead of schedule! Many miles more now under construction! #FinishTheWall
1:56 PM - Feb 20, 2019

Progress continues after the president secured billions more in funding for border wall construction.

Trump signed into law an appropriations bill earlier in February that doles out $1.375 billion for 55 miles of new wall, an amount immigration hardliners said was not enough. However, the president then took the controversial step on Feb. 15 of declaring a national emergency, which allowed him to allocate a total of about $8 billion in federal funds.

The emergency order has been adamantly opposed by Democrats and progressive groups.

A coalition of 16 states, led by California, filed suit against the president on Monday in an attempt to strike down the crisis declaration. A number of liberal organizations, such as the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Biological Diversity, have also leveled suits against the administration.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 3.03 seconds on 11/19/2024 at 02:55:34