192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 10:07 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:

Quote:
The best solution in my view would be for liberals (progressives) to take over the Democratic Party...

Why not the Republican Party?

Because you have a deeper pit to fill before you start to build with Republicans.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  5  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 10:11 am
And as a further on my post above re the shitshow and dilemmas arising from it for Republicans, Brian Beutler has more:
Quote:
House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell are at pains to maintain a façade of unity. But behind these conspicuous morale-boosting exercises, Republicans are doing a poor job concealing their awareness of how terribly this fledgling government is going. What they haven’t done is anything meaningful to change the trajectory. They have signed up for a suicide mission with Trump, without a complete understanding of what the purpose of the mission is, whether it will succeed, or how severe the collateral damage will be.

...At a glance, Trump is an odd star to hitch a wagon to. He’s extremely unpopular at a time when he should be about as popular as he’ll ever be. The latest national poll, from Quinnipiac University on Thursday, found that only 36 percent approve of the way Trump is handling his new job, while 44 percent disapprove (compared to 59 percent approval and 25 percent disapproval for Barack Obama).

Had Trump spent the first days of his presidency calming nerves and behaving graciously, he might be on the upswing, but instead, he did the opposite. Everywhere you look below the surface, Republicans show signs of discomfiture with Trump’s temperament and the rickety state of his government...
Read the whole piece
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 10:27 am
From Adam Gopnick at the New Yorker
Quote:
There is nothing subtle about Trump’s behavior. He lies, he repeats the lie, and his listeners either cower in fear, stammer in disbelief, or try to see how they can turn the lie to their own benefit. Every continental wiseguy, from Žižek to Baudrillard, insisted that when they pulled the full totalitarian wool over our eyes next time, we wouldn’t even know it was happening. Not a bit of it. Trump’s lies, and his urge to tell them, are pure Big Brother crude, however oafish their articulation. They are not postmodern traps and temptations; they are primitive schoolyard taunts and threats.

The blind, blatant disregard for truth is offered without even the sugar-façade of sweetness of temper or equableness or entertainment—offered not with a sheen of condescending consensus but in an ancient tone of rage, vanity, and vengeance. Trump is pure raging authoritarian id.

And so, rereading Orwell, one is reminded of what Orwell got right about this kind of brute authoritarianism—and that was essentially that it rests on lies told so often, and so repeatedly, that fighting the lie becomes not simply more dangerous but more exhausting than repeating it. Orwell saw, to his credit, that the act of falsifying reality is only secondarily a way of changing perceptions. It is, above all, a way of asserting power.
Link here
0 Replies
 
Leadfoot
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 10:27 am
@blatham,
Quote:
From Politico:
Again, if you don't support this wall, you are complicit in the drug trade and the opposite of a patriot. Also, the Mexican government is so evil, they want drugs to flow into the US. Sad.

Once again the easy to understand 'drug issue' can be used to gage the rationality of the source.

Just to point out the obvious: Do you think they are doing all that work to grow, process, package and distribute drugs (not to mention the risks involved) just to get us high? Obviously they do it for the money. And obviously it is we who want that drug flow across the border because we are paying for them.

If people can't figure this out - THAT'S what's Sad.
blatham
 
  3  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 10:35 am
I'd posted a WP story on state department leadership resigning. That piece got a bunch of stuff wrong. Here's a Vox post that give a better set of facts
http://www.vox.com/world/2017/1/27/14405542/washington-post-state-department-resignations
blatham
 
  3  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 10:46 am
@Leadfoot,
I know this is an important issue for you and I should have thought to steer you to something. About 15 - 20 years ago, Dan Gardner who was then writing at the Ottawa Citizen did the very finest series of pieces on the drug wars I've ever come across. Warning: it's very big with lots of important historical data but it's really well worth one's time if one is a reader. It's here Losing the War on Drugs
revelette1
 
  3  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 10:49 am
Trump's choice for Labor secretary outsourced jobs

Quote:
President Donald Trump's pick for labor secretary outsourced his fast-food company's technology department to the Philippines, a move that contradicts Trump's vow to keep American jobs in the U.S.

Trump has blasted, threatened and tried to charm American companies that have so much as contemplated moving jobs overseas, saying he's sticking up for American workers who aren't feeling the economic recovery and form his political base.

But a filing with the Labor Department on CEO Andrew Puzder's company — and a spokesman's acknowledgment that CKE continues to use the IT operation in the Philippines — provides a window into a key contradiction raised by the nomination.

Democrats and their allies are rushing to exploit Puzder's record on a big increase in the minimum wage, overtime rules and more as they question how well he would advocate for American workers.


More at the source, but hey, soon we won't have to worry about overseas workers taking over jobs, robots will but as long as the economy doesn't suffer I guess CI is happy.
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 10:56 am
@RABEL222,
There is a difference between the types of walls. Germany's wall was meant to keep people in, not out. It works a little differently, but we wouldn't expect you to know the difference.
blatham
 
  3  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 11:02 am
@revelette1,
Quote:
President Donald Trump's pick for labor secretary outsourced his fast-food company's technology department to the Philippines, a move that contradicts Trump's vow to keep American jobs in the U.S.

Another in a long line of bait and switch cons. It's the way these guys roll.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 11:04 am
@edgarblythe,
Quote:
The best solution in my view would be for liberals (progressives) to take over the Democratic Party, which the Young Turks and others are attempting to orchestrate.

Because everything up to this point hasn't been about real liberal/progressive policies? How much worse can you guys get. Sure, a lot of what you guys believe has gone MSM and I agree with some of the social advancements, but what's left? The only other way to go is farther to the left and that is going to lead you down the path to socialism. Bernie is a good example of that. The only thing missing from his platform was taking over privately owned companies.
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 11:07 am
@blatham,
Did you have a problem with Al Jazeera coming to the US? Of course you didn't... there is nothing wrong with a media organization owned by Qatar Royal Family pushing their bias across US airwaves...
blatham
 
  4  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 11:07 am
Smart point from Carl Bernstein
Quote:
This is the problem. We have now had, in the first week of the presidency, a series of untruths, falsehoods, as so many anchorpeople, as so many real reporters, have said, and the enemy here is not the opposition media, as Steve Bannon would have it, the enemy here is the truth. That the opposition is not the media; the opposition is becoming the truth. That is a very dangerous culture fact.
From CNN broadcast Jane 27
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 11:15 am
@Leadfoot,
Quote:
Once again the easy to understand 'drug issue' can be used to gage the rationality of the source.

Just to point out the obvious: Do you think they are doing all that work to grow, process, package and distribute drugs (not to mention the risks involved) just to get us high? Obviously they do it for the money. And obviously it is we who want that drug flow across the border because we are paying for them.

If people can't figure this out - THAT'S what's Sad.

We as in the American people? Well a portion of them do, but the majority are not for the hard drugs that get consumed. Crack, coke, X and heroin are at the top of the deadly list, ok maybe not X but the rest of the list is indeed deadly.

Legalizing pot across the US would effect the cartels, as control of the growing and distribution as well as the sale would be controlled locally. Much as it is here in CO.
Baldimo
 
  -3  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 11:23 am
@revelette1,
Quote:
More at the source, but hey, soon we won't have to worry about overseas workers taking over jobs, robots will but as long as the economy doesn't suffer I guess CI is happy.

Robots can do IT work? You know we could solve the illegal immigrant issue in the farming industry with robots or machines, it no longer requires human labor to pick crops.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  5  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 12:01 pm
@Baldimo,
Al Jazeera wasn't that bad. Really. Like the Wall Street Journal, there's a difference between the editorial page and the reporters out in the world.
Quote:
...but Al Jazeera America consistently expressed faith in the existence of a large unmet demand for straight news without opinion and sensationalism. That way it could be critical, consistent with its Al Jazeera identity and at the same time relevant to American news consumers.

This was where they went wrong:
Quote:
This was a remarkably optimistic view of the American citizenry. It showed trust in the discerning intelligence of US TV audiences, a presumption other cable news channels appeared to abandon long ago.

WP
0 Replies
 
Leadfoot
 
  0  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 12:13 pm
@blatham,
The drug issue is important to me (I credit an illegal drug for saving my life once) but I really do think it's a good litmus test of a politician's worthiness. Thanks for the link. Read a little and will go back for more.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  5  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 12:35 pm
@Baldimo,
Quote:
There is a difference between the types of walls. Germany's wall was meant to keep people in, not out. It works a little differently, but we wouldn't expect you to know the difference.

Yeh, the "Keep em in " walls have a big "I" on the side where they want the people to stay.
and the "Keep em out" walls have a big "O"
Leadfoot
 
  3  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 12:43 pm
@Baldimo,
Quote:
the majority are not for the hard drugs that get consumed.

Some people do screw up their lives on drugs. That's a fact that cannot be remedied with laws. Education and help for them would be a far better use of the ~$40 Billion a year we spend on drug enforcement and imprisonment.

Portugal decriminalized ALL drugs a decade ago and has seen no runaway drug problem and does see many benefits (lower HIV rates, fewer people in jail, etc).

And from a human rights perspective, I don't give a damn what 'the majority' thinks about what an individual adult chooses to consume. This is supposed to be a Constitutional Republic where individual rights are protected from mob rule, even if the mob is a majority.

McGentrix
 
  0  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 01:00 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

I think the local Buddhists are getting more aggressive. There was just a big march past here and they were all holding up signs that read, "Past Lives Matter"


I stopped reading at "Past Lives Matter". Then I laughed.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Fri 27 Jan, 2017 01:02 pm
@farmerman,
It all depends on where the guards are pointing their guns. Are you saying that as a US citizen, you don't think you would be able to just walk out of the US at the southern border very much the same way we do now?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.47 seconds on 10/06/2024 at 07:29:27