192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 11:56 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
We did it in 1946.

No one in their right mind would like to do anything the UK has done. The condition of your country has steadily deteriorated every year and continues at a rapid pace.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 12:09 pm
Quote:
Dem Rep: Impeach Trump for Virginia blackface scandals

Listen to this idiot. What kind of people do Democrats elect?
Quote:
Texas Congressman Al Green says the scandals that have engulfed the southern state are “a symptom” of Trumps’ influence on the country.

When we allow bigotry to infect the body politic with impunity at the highest level, other levels will expect impunity for their bigotry. Gov. Northam’s refusal to resign for his bigotry is a symptom. Failure to act on Pres. Trump’s bigotry is the problem. #ImpeachmentIsNotDead

— Congressman Al Green (@RepAlGreen) February 7, 2019

http://www.theamericanmirror.com/dem-rep-blames-trump-for-virginia-blackface-scandals-vows-impeachment-vote/
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 12:16 pm
Quote:
Israel Haters Silent As Palestinians Gassed in Tunnel. Can You Guess Why?

Quote:
One of the tests to determine who is an antisemite is to see if they employ a double standard against Israel, the only Jewish state in the world.

And today, we were handed the opportunity to put that test into action, with news that two palestinians died after Egypt pumped toxic gas into the smuggling tunnel they were in.

Crickets. Why would Egypt kill Palestinians and why is there not a uproar declaring Egyptian troops are terrorists?
https://www.israellycool.com/2019/02/11/israel-haters-silent-as-palestinians-gassed-in-tunnel-can-you-guess-why/
hightor
 
  2  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 12:20 pm
@coldjoint,
I agree; it's dumb. Northam exhibited no "bigotry" and neither did the A.G. But representatives are often elected because of the work they do for their constituents and maybe Mr. Green is more effective dealing with those sorts of bread and butter issues.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  4  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 12:25 pm
@coldjoint,
Egypt has a history of clashes with Gazan Palestinians and has destroyed tunnels when they are discovered. Those smugglers knew the risk they were facing. It's not remotely similar to the political struggle between the Palestinians and Israel.
georgeob1
 
  1  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 12:33 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

All you have to do is change your thinking. Free health care is a right, not a privilege. I'm not going to pay for treatment, I'm a human being, not a dog. We have to pay vets, not doctors.

But you do pay for it -- in your taxes. Moreover your government gets to decide just how much of it or what you will get. In the same way your dog gets only the care you choose to give it.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 12:36 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
Egypt has a history of clashes with Gazan Palestinians

To go along with this kind of reaction, which is no reaction at all. If Egypt kills Palestinians because they consider them terrorists why can't Israel?
izzythepush
 
  1  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 12:39 pm
Someone who dropped napalm and agent orange on Vietnamese civilians is not best placed to talk about healthcare.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 12:43 pm
@InfraBlue,
Quote:
ISIS and al Qaeda would have absolutely nothing on the Zionists.

When is the last time Israel burned anyone alive, made a video of it, and released it on the internet? You are quite simply as full of **** as you are with hate.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 12:52 pm
https://c1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Spart-2020-600-LI.jpg
https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/02/branco-cartoon-blowhard/
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  3  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 01:39 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

InfraBlue wrote:
When Israel's existence is predicated on its refusal to abide by international resolutions and agreements in order to maintain a particular demographic majority then its existence is necessarily oppressive. It should not exist.
Israel is not refusing anything. Those resolutions require Israel to give up land in exchange for peaceful acceptance by the Palestinians. Israel has repeatedly offered to do just that.

The resolutions and agreements call for the return of refugees. The land
for peace are separate agreements.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 01:41 pm
Quote:
Russia is considering whether to disconnect from the global internet briefly, as part of a test of its cyber-defences.

The test will mean data passing between Russian citizens and organisations stays inside the nation rather than being routed internationally.

A draft law mandating technical changes needed to operate independently was introduced to its parliament last year.

The test is expected to happen before 1 April but no exact date has been set.

The draft law, called the Digital Economy National Program, requires Russia's ISPs to ensure that it can operate in the event of foreign powers acting to isolate the country online.

Nato and its allies have threatened to sanction Russia over the cyber-attacks and other online interference which it is regularly accused of instigating.

The measures outlined in the law include Russia building its own version of the net's address system, known as DNS, so it can operate if links to these internationally-located servers are cut.

Currently, 12 organisations oversee the root servers for DNS and none of them are in Russia. However many copies of the net's core address book do already exist inside Russia suggesting its net systems could keep working even if punitive action was taken to cut it off.

The test is also expected to involve ISPs demonstrating that they can direct data to government-controlled routing points. These will filter traffic so that data sent between Russians reaches its destination, but any destined for foreign computers is discarded.

Eventually the Russian government wants all domestic traffic to pass through these routing points. This is believed to be part of an effort to set up a mass censorship system akin to that seen in China, which tries to scrub out prohibited traffic.

Russian news organisations reported that the nation's ISPs are broadly backing the aims of the draft law but are divided on how to do it. They believe the test will cause "major disruption" to Russian internet traffic, reports tech news website ZDNet.

The Russian government is providing cash for ISPs to modify their infrastructure so the redirection effort can be properly tested.

Analysis: Zoe Kleinman, BBC technology reporter
How does an entire country "unplug" itself from the internet?

It's important to understand a little about how the internet works. It is essentially a series of thousands of digital networks along which information travels. These networks are connected by router points - and they are notoriously the weakest link in the chain.

What Russia wants to do is to bring those router points that handle data entering or exiting the country within its borders and under its control- so that it can then pull up the drawbridge, as it were, to external traffic if it's under threat - or if it decides to censor what outside information people can access.

China's firewall is probably the world's best known censorship tool and it has become a sophisticated operation. It also polices its router points, using filters and blocks on keywords and certain websites and redirecting web traffic so that computers cannot connect to sites the state does not wish Chinese citizens to see.

It is possible to get around some firewalls using virtual private networks (VPNs) - which disguise the location of a computer so the filters do not kick in - but some regimes are more tolerant of them than others. China cracks down on them from time to time and the punishment for providing or using illegal VPNs can be a prison sentence.

Occasionally countries disconnect themselves by accident - Mauritania was left offline for two days in 2018 after the undersea fibre cable that supplied its internet was cut, possibly by a trawler.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-47198426
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  4  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 01:46 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

InfraBlue wrote:
And it all will have been done in the name of maintaining its oppression of the Palestinian people for ethnocentric purposes. Talk about fanatical extremism. ISIS and al Qaeda would have absolutely nothing on the Zionists.
By defining Israel's very existence as oppression, you make a two-state solution impossible. Without negotiations for a two-state solution, Israel will never have to give up Areas B and C.

The two state solution was dead before it was even conceived.
revelette1
 
  2  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 01:47 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
We did it in 1946.


Well and good. You do not have same environment as we do here.
oralloy
 
  -4  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 01:54 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:
The resolutions and agreements call for the return of refugees. The land for peace are separate agreements.
That is incorrect. There is no requirement that Israel accept any refugees.

UN Security Council resolutions call for Israel to give up land and call for the Palestinians to peacefully accept Israel.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 01:55 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:
The two state solution was dead before it was even conceived.
The world only asks Israel to give up land as part of a two-state solution.

No two-state solution means Israel gets to keep Areas B and C for themselves.
gungasnake
 
  -1  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 02:01 pm
@coldjoint,
Al Green is stupidest of the stupid category. The guy's head look like a fuzzy bowling ball.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  2  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 02:01 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
No two-state solution means Israel gets to keep Areas B and C for themselves.

And they also get to keep the Palestinians now living there. Which means that a generation or two from now, when they grant them citizenship, Isreal will no longer be a Jewish state.
Olivier5
 
  1  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 02:05 pm
@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:

Quote:
We did it [universal health care] in 1946.


Well and good. You do not have same environment as we do here.

No worry. One tiny increment after the other, you ought to get there by 2046.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Mon 11 Feb, 2019 02:07 pm
@Olivier5,
The only Palestinians in Area C are there to scrub the settlers' toilets.

There are Palestinians in Area B, true. But they will never be granted Israeli citizenship.

Over the next few centuries I suspect that Palestinians in Area B will be pressured into moving to Area A.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.42 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 08:38:28