@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:All righty now. (rubs hands together). So I'm ready for you to admit it was overkill to attempt to remove Clinton from the WhiteHouse
The pursuit of Bill Clinton was justified revenge after the witch hunts against President Nixon, President Reagan, and Senator Packwood.
Had the Democrats not been conducting witch hunts against Republicans, the Republicans never would have bothered Bill Clinton.
glitterbag wrote:because he lied about a BJ.
It was a bit more than a lie. It was perjury in a civil trial, perjury before a grand jury, obstruction of justice (sending Betty Currie to remove the gifts that he had given to Monica Lewinsky before investigators could find them), witness tampering (coaching Betty Currie on how she should testify in court), sexual harassment (Paula Jones), sexual assault (Kathleen Willey), and rape (Juanita Broaddrick).
glitterbag wrote:You were on your high horse grumbling about the immorality of that administration...
It is fair for Republicans to respond in kind when Democrats conduct witch hunts against them.
It'll be a long time before we have a Democratic president again. But when we finally do, one day in the distant future, they will spend their entire presidency dodging impeachment inquiries as the Republicans take justified revenge for the witch hunt against Trump.
It is likely that the "grumbling" that you refer to was merely me pointing out that, since the Democrats said it was OK for Bill Clinton to commit all of those crimes, it is also OK for a Republican president to commit all of those crimes.
Not that any Republican president actually has committed those crimes, but leftists like to falsely accuse Republicans of imaginary crimes, so the topic comes up from time to time.
glitterbag wrote:...and NOW you claim everybody lies to Congress and it's nonsense to commit perjury and be held liable????
Well, yes.
Setting aside the fact that everybody has always lied to Congress, since the Democrats said that Bill Clinton's crime spree was OK, these supposed crimes are trivial.
glitterbag wrote:Please think about that a minute, you know that was your argument several years ago. I remember it vividly because that was all you (oral) needed back then to condemn or jail another person.
If the Democrats are going to persecute Republicans over nothing, it is quite fair for the Republicans to do the same to Democrats.
And if the Democrats are going to place themselves above the law, it is also fair for Republicans to do the same.
glitterbag wrote:Apparently, you are an inherently intolerant male,
Well, I certainly can't abide evil.
glitterbag wrote:a male who would punish others simply you don't like them
Perhaps. But I only dislike people who are evil.
glitterbag wrote:or because you are so insecure you suspect everyone is smarter and better informed than you.
LOL! No. That's not an affliction that I suffer from. Be serious.
My IQ is 170. It is true that there are subjects that I do not know about. I do not know much about brain surgery, for example. But I am not particularly bothered by my lack of knowledge in those areas. I'm plenty informed about the areas that I care about.